Global gender representation in neurointerventional surgery: a natural language processing analysis of journal publications.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Daniela Renedo, Andrew B Koo, Abdelaziz Amllay, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Bushra Fathima, Joseph O Haynes, Guido J Falcone, Kevin N Sheth, Sandra Abi Fadel, Michele H Johnson, Ryan Hebert, Cyprien Rivier, Charles Matouk
{"title":"Global gender representation in neurointerventional surgery: a natural language processing analysis of journal publications.","authors":"Daniela Renedo, Andrew B Koo, Abdelaziz Amllay, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Bushra Fathima, Joseph O Haynes, Guido J Falcone, Kevin N Sheth, Sandra Abi Fadel, Michele H Johnson, Ryan Hebert, Cyprien Rivier, Charles Matouk","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increased awareness of diversity and inclusion in neurointerventional surgery, the representation of women in neurointerventional academic publishing has not been systematically quantified. We aimed to evaluate global and temporal gender trends among authors publishing in leading neurointerventional journals using natural language processing (NLP) tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Entrez and Medline APIs (application programming interfaces) to extract metadata from all articles published between 2014 and 2024 in the <i>Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery</i> and <i>Interventional Neuroradiology</i>, the only two journals dedicated exclusively to the field of neurointerventional surgery. For each publication, we identified the first and last authors, as well as their institutional affiliations. We applied the OpenAI GPT-4 API to infer the country of origin based on last author affiliations and to predict gender using first and last names.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 4875 articles published between 2014 and 2024 in two leading neurointerventional surgery journals, female authorship increased modestly over time. In 2014, 10.2% of first authors and 6.1% of last authors were women, compared with 14.2% and 7.6%, respectively, in 2024. A significant upward trend in female first authorship was observed over time using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend (P=0.0002), with the strongest increases in the Americas and Asia. In contrast, no overall increase was seen in female last authorship (P=0.14), with a modest but significant trend observed only in Asia. Geographic disparities were also evident: Austria and Norway had the highest female last authorship rates (62.5% and 40.0%, respectively), whereas the US, despite contributing the most publications, had only 13.8%. The Gender Parity Index (GPI) further highlighted under-representation, with most countries falling well below parity, especially for last authorship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis using artificial intelligence driven NLP methods suggests persistent gender inequalities in neurointerventional surgery authorship with variation across countries. Although female representation has improved over the past decade, progress is uneven. These findings underscore the need for targeted efforts to promote equity in academic vascular neurosurgery globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023956","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite increased awareness of diversity and inclusion in neurointerventional surgery, the representation of women in neurointerventional academic publishing has not been systematically quantified. We aimed to evaluate global and temporal gender trends among authors publishing in leading neurointerventional journals using natural language processing (NLP) tools.

Methods: We used the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Entrez and Medline APIs (application programming interfaces) to extract metadata from all articles published between 2014 and 2024 in the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, the only two journals dedicated exclusively to the field of neurointerventional surgery. For each publication, we identified the first and last authors, as well as their institutional affiliations. We applied the OpenAI GPT-4 API to infer the country of origin based on last author affiliations and to predict gender using first and last names.

Results: Across 4875 articles published between 2014 and 2024 in two leading neurointerventional surgery journals, female authorship increased modestly over time. In 2014, 10.2% of first authors and 6.1% of last authors were women, compared with 14.2% and 7.6%, respectively, in 2024. A significant upward trend in female first authorship was observed over time using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend (P=0.0002), with the strongest increases in the Americas and Asia. In contrast, no overall increase was seen in female last authorship (P=0.14), with a modest but significant trend observed only in Asia. Geographic disparities were also evident: Austria and Norway had the highest female last authorship rates (62.5% and 40.0%, respectively), whereas the US, despite contributing the most publications, had only 13.8%. The Gender Parity Index (GPI) further highlighted under-representation, with most countries falling well below parity, especially for last authorship.

Conclusions: Analysis using artificial intelligence driven NLP methods suggests persistent gender inequalities in neurointerventional surgery authorship with variation across countries. Although female representation has improved over the past decade, progress is uneven. These findings underscore the need for targeted efforts to promote equity in academic vascular neurosurgery globally.

神经介入外科的全球性别代表:期刊出版物的自然语言处理分析。
背景:尽管人们越来越意识到神经介入手术的多样性和包容性,但女性在神经介入学术出版物中的代表性尚未得到系统的量化。我们旨在使用自然语言处理(NLP)工具评估在主要神经介入期刊上发表文章的作者的全球和时间性别趋势。方法:我们使用国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI)的Entrez和Medline api(应用程序编程接口)从2014年至2024年发表在《神经介入外科杂志》和《介入神经放射学》上的所有文章中提取元数据,这是仅有的两本专门用于神经介入外科领域的期刊。对于每个出版物,我们确定了第一和最后的作者,以及他们的机构隶属关系。我们应用OpenAI GPT-4 API,根据最后的作者隶属关系推断原籍国,并使用名字和姓氏预测性别。结果:2014年至2024年间,在两家领先的神经介入外科期刊上发表的4875篇文章中,女性作者数量随着时间的推移略有增加。2014年,10.2%的第一作者和6.1%的最后作者是女性,而2024年这一比例分别为14.2%和7.6%。使用Cochran-Armitage趋势检验观察到,随着时间的推移,女性第一作者的数量呈显著上升趋势(P=0.0002),其中美洲和亚洲的增长最为强劲。相比之下,女性最后作者的总体数量没有增加(P=0.14),仅在亚洲观察到适度但显著的趋势。地理差异也很明显:奥地利和挪威的女性最后作者率最高(分别为62.5%和40.0%),而美国尽管贡献了最多的出版物,但只有13.8%。性别平等指数(GPI)进一步凸显了代表性不足,大多数国家远远低于性别平等,尤其是在最后作者方面。结论:使用人工智能驱动的NLP方法进行的分析表明,神经介入手术作者中存在持续的性别不平等,且各国存在差异。尽管在过去十年中,女性代表人数有所增加,但进展并不均衡。这些发现强调需要有针对性的努力来促进全球血管神经外科学术的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信