Utility of enhanced quantitative urine culture technique for isolation of uro-pathogens in children.

IF 1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Kavita Gupta, Prashanth Purushotham, Nischitha Vallurupalli, Bilal Malik, Saroj Dash
{"title":"Utility of enhanced quantitative urine culture technique for isolation of uro-pathogens in children.","authors":"Kavita Gupta, Prashanth Purushotham, Nischitha Vallurupalli, Bilal Malik, Saroj Dash","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_260_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infection worldwide. Symptoms of UTI in children is vague & non-specific and mostly underdiagnosed Standard urine culture (SUC) is the gold standard for detecting uropathogens but the clinical correlation and its implication in initiating antimicrobial therapy continue to be a question for decision-making. Enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) was developed to overcome these limitations. However, its utility to diagnose paediatric UTI has not been well explored, necessitating the need for new diagnostic methods. The study was conducted to evaluate the utility of EQUC for isolation of bacterial uropathogens in children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective observation study was conducted and urine samples were collected and processed using both SUC and EQUC techniques. Microbial identification was performed using phenotypic characteristics and biochemical tests. VITEK 2 SYSTEM was used for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing whenever required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 samples were collected from 84 patients and subjected to SUC and EQUC techniques. SUC identified 50 positive samples (32.05%), while EQUC identified 87 positive samples (55.7%). EQUC recovered 25% more organisms compared to SUC. Escherichia coli was the most common organism isolated in both the techniques. Management of patients considering EQUC results showed better recovery in all age groups especially for midstream urine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EQUC technique demonstrated higher recovery rates of uro-pathogens compared to the SUC, making it a valuable tool for diagnosing paediatric UTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 7","pages":"2837-2841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_260_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infection worldwide. Symptoms of UTI in children is vague & non-specific and mostly underdiagnosed Standard urine culture (SUC) is the gold standard for detecting uropathogens but the clinical correlation and its implication in initiating antimicrobial therapy continue to be a question for decision-making. Enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) was developed to overcome these limitations. However, its utility to diagnose paediatric UTI has not been well explored, necessitating the need for new diagnostic methods. The study was conducted to evaluate the utility of EQUC for isolation of bacterial uropathogens in children.

Method: A prospective observation study was conducted and urine samples were collected and processed using both SUC and EQUC techniques. Microbial identification was performed using phenotypic characteristics and biochemical tests. VITEK 2 SYSTEM was used for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing whenever required.

Results: A total of 156 samples were collected from 84 patients and subjected to SUC and EQUC techniques. SUC identified 50 positive samples (32.05%), while EQUC identified 87 positive samples (55.7%). EQUC recovered 25% more organisms compared to SUC. Escherichia coli was the most common organism isolated in both the techniques. Management of patients considering EQUC results showed better recovery in all age groups especially for midstream urine.

Conclusion: The EQUC technique demonstrated higher recovery rates of uro-pathogens compared to the SUC, making it a valuable tool for diagnosing paediatric UTIs.

强化定量尿液培养技术在儿童尿路病原体分离中的应用。
背景:尿路感染是世界范围内最常见的细菌感染。标准尿培养(SUC)是检测尿路病原体的金标准,但其临床相关性及其对启动抗菌治疗的意义仍然是一个决策问题。增强定量尿液培养(EQUC)的发展就是为了克服这些局限性。然而,其诊断儿科尿路感染的效用尚未得到很好的探索,因此需要新的诊断方法。本研究旨在评估EQUC在儿童尿路细菌病原菌分离中的应用价值。方法:采用前瞻性观察研究,收集尿液样本,采用SUC和EQUC技术进行处理。微生物鉴定采用表型特征和生化试验。需要时使用VITEK 2 SYSTEM进行鉴定和药敏试验。结果:84例患者共采集了156份样本,并进行了SUC和EQUC技术。SUC检出阳性样本50份(32.05%),EQUC检出阳性样本87份(55.7%)。与SUC相比,EQUC多回收了25%的生物。大肠杆菌是两种技术中分离出的最常见的微生物。考虑EQUC结果的患者管理显示,所有年龄组的患者恢复良好,特别是中游尿。结论:与SUC相比,EQUC技术具有更高的尿路病原体回收率,是诊断儿童uti的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信