Endothelial function in high-risk patients with ezetimibe therapy.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Merve Günes-Altan, Agnes Bosch, Kristina Striepe, Mario Schiffer, Stephan Achenbach, Roland E Schmieder, Dennis Kannenkeril
{"title":"Endothelial function in high-risk patients with ezetimibe therapy.","authors":"Merve Günes-Altan, Agnes Bosch, Kristina Striepe, Mario Schiffer, Stephan Achenbach, Roland E Schmieder, Dennis Kannenkeril","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device. Endothelial function parameters were compared between patients with ezetimibe (E+ group) and without ezetimibe therapy (E- group) (NCT03626831).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to patients in the E- group (n = 70), patients in the E+ group (n = 21) were younger (67.0 ± 7.4 vs 61.2 ± 7.2 years; P = .002), had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.2 ± 13.3 vs 102.0 ± 18.1 mg/dL (P = .013) and lower office systolic blood pressure (123.9 ± 11.4 vs 130.2 ± 14.5 mm Hg (P = .042). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was lower in the E+ group than in the E- group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; P = .037). We found a greater flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (6.1 ± 2.0 vs 3.7 ± 3.2%; P = .004) and lower brachial intima-media thickness (0.28 ± 0.1 vs 0.32 ± 0 mm; P = .011) in the E+ group compared to the E- group. When confounders were entered in a covariance analysis, the differences in FMD (P = .034) and hsCRP (P = .049) between the groups remained significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed a difference of FMD suggesting potentially better endothelial function in high-risk ASCVD patients on ezetimibe plus statin compared to statin monotherapy; however, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment.

Methods: A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device. Endothelial function parameters were compared between patients with ezetimibe (E+ group) and without ezetimibe therapy (E- group) (NCT03626831).

Results: Compared to patients in the E- group (n = 70), patients in the E+ group (n = 21) were younger (67.0 ± 7.4 vs 61.2 ± 7.2 years; P = .002), had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.2 ± 13.3 vs 102.0 ± 18.1 mg/dL (P = .013) and lower office systolic blood pressure (123.9 ± 11.4 vs 130.2 ± 14.5 mm Hg (P = .042). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was lower in the E+ group than in the E- group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; P = .037). We found a greater flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (6.1 ± 2.0 vs 3.7 ± 3.2%; P = .004) and lower brachial intima-media thickness (0.28 ± 0.1 vs 0.32 ± 0 mm; P = .011) in the E+ group compared to the E- group. When confounders were entered in a covariance analysis, the differences in FMD (P = .034) and hsCRP (P = .049) between the groups remained significant.

Conclusion: In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed a difference of FMD suggesting potentially better endothelial function in high-risk ASCVD patients on ezetimibe plus statin compared to statin monotherapy; however, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.

依折替米贝治疗对高危患者内皮功能的影响。
背景:内皮功能受损可预测心血管(CV)事件,即使在已确诊的动脉粥样硬化性CV疾病(ASCVD)患者中也是如此。本事后分析的目的是比较高危患者在优化的他汀类药物治疗和不加依折麦比治疗时的内皮功能。方法:纳入91例接受他汀类药物(阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀)治疗的ASCVD患者,并通过UNEX EF装置检查内皮功能。比较ezetimibe治疗组(E+组)和未ezetimibe治疗组(E-组)的内皮功能参数(NCT03626831)。结果:与E-组(n = 70)患者相比,E+组(n = 21)患者更年轻(67.0±7.4 vs 61.2±7.2岁;P = 0.002),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇较低(91.2±13.3 vs 102.0±18.1 mg/dL (P = 0.013),办公室收缩压较低(123.9±11.4 vs 130.2±14.5 mm Hg (P = 0.042)。E+组高敏c反应蛋白(hsCRP)低于E-组(0.5±0.4 vs 1.1±0.9 mg/L;P = .037)。我们发现血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)更大(6.1±2.0 vs 3.7±3.2%;P = 0.004)和下臂内膜-中膜厚度(0.28±0.1 vs 0.32±0 mm;P = .011)。当在协方差分析中输入混杂因素时,两组间FMD (P = 0.034)和hsCRP (P = 0.049)的差异仍然显著。结论:在这项横断面分析中,我们观察到FMD的差异,表明依折替米贝加他汀治疗与他汀单药治疗相比,高危ASCVD患者内皮功能可能更好;然而,不能得出因果结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信