Merve Günes-Altan, Agnes Bosch, Kristina Striepe, Mario Schiffer, Stephan Achenbach, Roland E Schmieder, Dennis Kannenkeril
{"title":"Endothelial function in high-risk patients with ezetimibe therapy.","authors":"Merve Günes-Altan, Agnes Bosch, Kristina Striepe, Mario Schiffer, Stephan Achenbach, Roland E Schmieder, Dennis Kannenkeril","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device. Endothelial function parameters were compared between patients with ezetimibe (E+ group) and without ezetimibe therapy (E- group) (NCT03626831).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to patients in the E- group (n = 70), patients in the E+ group (n = 21) were younger (67.0 ± 7.4 vs 61.2 ± 7.2 years; P = .002), had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.2 ± 13.3 vs 102.0 ± 18.1 mg/dL (P = .013) and lower office systolic blood pressure (123.9 ± 11.4 vs 130.2 ± 14.5 mm Hg (P = .042). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was lower in the E+ group than in the E- group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; P = .037). We found a greater flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (6.1 ± 2.0 vs 3.7 ± 3.2%; P = .004) and lower brachial intima-media thickness (0.28 ± 0.1 vs 0.32 ± 0 mm; P = .011) in the E+ group compared to the E- group. When confounders were entered in a covariance analysis, the differences in FMD (P = .034) and hsCRP (P = .049) between the groups remained significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed a difference of FMD suggesting potentially better endothelial function in high-risk ASCVD patients on ezetimibe plus statin compared to statin monotherapy; however, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment.
Methods: A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device. Endothelial function parameters were compared between patients with ezetimibe (E+ group) and without ezetimibe therapy (E- group) (NCT03626831).
Results: Compared to patients in the E- group (n = 70), patients in the E+ group (n = 21) were younger (67.0 ± 7.4 vs 61.2 ± 7.2 years; P = .002), had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.2 ± 13.3 vs 102.0 ± 18.1 mg/dL (P = .013) and lower office systolic blood pressure (123.9 ± 11.4 vs 130.2 ± 14.5 mm Hg (P = .042). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was lower in the E+ group than in the E- group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; P = .037). We found a greater flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (6.1 ± 2.0 vs 3.7 ± 3.2%; P = .004) and lower brachial intima-media thickness (0.28 ± 0.1 vs 0.32 ± 0 mm; P = .011) in the E+ group compared to the E- group. When confounders were entered in a covariance analysis, the differences in FMD (P = .034) and hsCRP (P = .049) between the groups remained significant.
Conclusion: In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed a difference of FMD suggesting potentially better endothelial function in high-risk ASCVD patients on ezetimibe plus statin compared to statin monotherapy; however, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.