Pre-gestational diabetes: benefits and barriers to attendance at pre-pregnancy clinics.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cathriona Murphy, Linda Culliney, Sinead Whelan, Louise O'Mahony, Ashling Kennedy, Michelle Sugrue, Adrianne Wyse, Oratile Kgosidialwa, Mairead O'Riordan, Antoinette Tuthill
{"title":"Pre-gestational diabetes: benefits and barriers to attendance at pre-pregnancy clinics.","authors":"Cathriona Murphy, Linda Culliney, Sinead Whelan, Louise O'Mahony, Ashling Kennedy, Michelle Sugrue, Adrianne Wyse, Oratile Kgosidialwa, Mairead O'Riordan, Antoinette Tuthill","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04037-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pre-pregnancy clinics are a well-established and cost-effective way of reducing pregnancy complications.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to review outcome differences between women with pre-gestational diabetes who did/did not attend pre-pregnancy clinics and to evaluate barriers to attendance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1) A retrospective study examined data from all women with pre-gestational diabetes who received obstetric care in Cork University Maternity Hospital 2015-2019. 2) A cross-sectional survey of women attending antenatal clinics during the study period. A telephone questionnaire was completed to understand facilitators and barriers to pre-pregnancy attendance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred women were included retrospectively: 65.5% with Type1 diabetes, and 30.5% with type 2 diabetes. Only 26% (52) attended pre-pregnancy clinics. Although there were no differences in miscarriage rate, congenital anomaly, mode of delivery or neonatal intensive care unit admission between groups, the mean birth weight of babies born to women who attended pre-pregnancy clinics was less than those who did not attend (3294.5 ± 753.0 g vs. 3598.8 ± 802.8 g; p = 0.02). Twenty-eight women were included cross-sectionally, nine of whom attended pre-pregnancy clinics. All who attended found it useful. Eight participants proposed a hybrid clinic model to optimise future service engagement. Increasing awareness was advocated by many participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Attendance at pre-pregnancy clinics is low. Lack of awareness is the greatest barrier reported to attendance. To optimise perinatal outcomes, efforts are required to increase attendance; this may be facilitated by increasing awareness of these clinics, as suggested by the women themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04037-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pre-pregnancy clinics are a well-established and cost-effective way of reducing pregnancy complications.

Aims: This study aimed to review outcome differences between women with pre-gestational diabetes who did/did not attend pre-pregnancy clinics and to evaluate barriers to attendance.

Methods: 1) A retrospective study examined data from all women with pre-gestational diabetes who received obstetric care in Cork University Maternity Hospital 2015-2019. 2) A cross-sectional survey of women attending antenatal clinics during the study period. A telephone questionnaire was completed to understand facilitators and barriers to pre-pregnancy attendance.

Results: Two hundred women were included retrospectively: 65.5% with Type1 diabetes, and 30.5% with type 2 diabetes. Only 26% (52) attended pre-pregnancy clinics. Although there were no differences in miscarriage rate, congenital anomaly, mode of delivery or neonatal intensive care unit admission between groups, the mean birth weight of babies born to women who attended pre-pregnancy clinics was less than those who did not attend (3294.5 ± 753.0 g vs. 3598.8 ± 802.8 g; p = 0.02). Twenty-eight women were included cross-sectionally, nine of whom attended pre-pregnancy clinics. All who attended found it useful. Eight participants proposed a hybrid clinic model to optimise future service engagement. Increasing awareness was advocated by many participants.

Conclusion: Attendance at pre-pregnancy clinics is low. Lack of awareness is the greatest barrier reported to attendance. To optimise perinatal outcomes, efforts are required to increase attendance; this may be facilitated by increasing awareness of these clinics, as suggested by the women themselves.

妊娠前糖尿病:在妊娠前诊所就诊的好处和障碍。
背景:妊娠前糖尿病会增加不良妊娠结局的风险。孕前诊所是一种行之有效且具有成本效益的减少妊娠并发症的方法。目的:本研究旨在回顾妊娠前糖尿病妇女在孕前诊所就诊和未就诊之间的结果差异,并评估就诊的障碍。方法:1)回顾性研究2015-2019年在科克大学妇产医院接受产科护理的所有妊娠前糖尿病妇女的数据。2)对研究期间到产前诊所就诊的妇女进行横断面调查。完成了一份电话问卷,以了解孕前出勤的促进因素和障碍。结果:回顾性纳入200名女性:65.5%为1型糖尿病,30.5%为2型糖尿病。只有26%(52人)到孕前诊所就诊。虽然两组之间在流产率、先天性异常、分娩方式或新生儿重症监护病房入住方面没有差异,但接受孕前门诊治疗的妇女所生婴儿的平均出生体重低于未接受孕前门诊治疗的妇女(3294.5±753.0 g vs 3598.8±802.8 g;p = 0.02)。横断面纳入28名妇女,其中9人参加了孕前诊所。所有参加的人都觉得它很有用。八位嘉宾提出一种混合诊所模式,以优化未来的服务参与。许多与会者都提倡提高认识。结论:孕前门诊的就诊率较低。据报道,缺乏意识是阻碍出勤的最大障碍。为了优化围产期结果,需要努力提高出勤率;正如妇女自己所建议的那样,提高对这些诊所的认识可以促进这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信