Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Navid Delshad , Preethy Paul , Michael Santos Silva , Emrah Yatkin , Mikko Voipio , Senthil Kumar Rajendran , John E. Eriksson
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies","authors":"Navid Delshad ,&nbsp;Preethy Paul ,&nbsp;Michael Santos Silva ,&nbsp;Emrah Yatkin ,&nbsp;Mikko Voipio ,&nbsp;Senthil Kumar Rajendran ,&nbsp;John E. Eriksson","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) — two diterpenoids from plant <em>Anisomeles malabarica</em>. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key <em>in vitro</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary <em>in vivo</em> PK analyses. <em>In vitro</em> experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent <em>in vivo</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 107235"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) — two diterpenoids from plant Anisomeles malabarica. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary in vivo PK analyses. In vitro experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.

Abstract Image

异戊二酸和卵泡二内酯的药代动力学、代谢和毒性:临床前研究的给药指导路线。
尽管癌症治疗研究取得了广泛进展,但由于药代动力学和安全性不理想,将有希望的抗癌化合物转化为临床治疗往往失败。这些缺点强调了在药物开发的早期阶段进行全面药代动力学(PK)分析的迫切需要。在多项临床前研究中显示有抗癌作用的化合物包括异戊二酸(AA)和卵二烯内酯(ovatodiolide, OVT),这两种二萜类化合物来自于植物马氏异戊二烯。然而,它们的药代动力学和毒性特征仍然很差。为了探索它们作为化疗药物的潜力,我们首先评估了它们的关键体外药代动力学(PK)参数,然后进行了急性口服毒性评估和补充的体内PK分析。体外实验表明,AA和OVT在磷酸盐缓冲液中几乎完全溶解,稳定性高,在MDR1- mdck细胞单层具有很强的通透性,并且不是多药耐药蛋白(MDR1)的底物。然而,在NADPH存在的情况下,OVT在肝微粒体中代谢迅速,而AA在相同条件下表现出相对更大的稳定性。随后的小鼠体内药代动力学(PK)分析也表明,静脉注射(IV)或透皮(TD)给药后,这两种化合物的清除速度快,全身生物利用度低。代谢物鉴定显示与半胱氨酸广泛结合,高剂量口服无急性毒性或死亡。总的来说,这些数据强调了不同的代谢和清除模式,限制了系统生物利用度,但强调了AA和OVT的良好安全性。此外,虽然局部给药可能为局部条件提供治疗优势,但额外的配方策略对于克服全身使用AA或OVT的有限生物利用度至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信