Jamie Olsen , Mary Chew , Janet Fawcett , Christina Badaracco
{"title":"Nurse-administered malnutrition screening tool improves access to nutrition care and malnutrition diagnoses","authors":"Jamie Olsen , Mary Chew , Janet Fawcett , Christina Badaracco","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients. Early identification and treatment can improve outcomes. The objective of the study was to determine the impacts of using a nurse-administered Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a mixed-methods retrospective cohort study of 6163 patients admitted to a VA hospital for at least 48 h and screened for malnutrition risk from May 1, 2018, to March 1, 2020. Data was abstracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and electronic surveys were administered to staff RNs and RDNs to evaluate perceptions. Alchemer and Excel were used to collect and assess clinician survey responses and care coordination. Mann–Whitney tests assessed outcome measures of changes in time from admission to malnutrition screening, assessment, diagnosis; number of nutrition assessments completed by RDNs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The time from admission to screening was reduced post-MST implementation [1.0 IQR (0.5, 2.4) to 14.6 IQR (9.6, 19) hours, p < 0.001]. The time to assessment increased [20.6 IQR (3.8, 29.5) to 34.1 IQR (16.6, 54.7) hours, p < 0.001], but the time to malnutrition diagnosis did not change [34.8 IQR (18.2, 47.8) vs. 28.1 IQR (17.3, 44.6) hours, p = 0.263]. The percentage of patients assessed increased from 4.8 % (164/3383) to 25.8 % (717/2780) (p < 0.001) and the percentage diagnosed with malnutrition increased from 5.3 % to 11 % (p < 0.001). Most registered nurses (RNs) felt that the MST improved quality of care, while RDNs did not. Most RNs reported that the MST was easy to use. The majority of RDNs felt their workflows improved. Both RNs and RDNs agreed that the process change improved collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MST implementation improved overall access to care. Findings from this study can be used to optimize resources to improve clinical workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 571-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457725028888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients. Early identification and treatment can improve outcomes. The objective of the study was to determine the impacts of using a nurse-administered Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST).
Methods
This was a mixed-methods retrospective cohort study of 6163 patients admitted to a VA hospital for at least 48 h and screened for malnutrition risk from May 1, 2018, to March 1, 2020. Data was abstracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and electronic surveys were administered to staff RNs and RDNs to evaluate perceptions. Alchemer and Excel were used to collect and assess clinician survey responses and care coordination. Mann–Whitney tests assessed outcome measures of changes in time from admission to malnutrition screening, assessment, diagnosis; number of nutrition assessments completed by RDNs.
Results
The time from admission to screening was reduced post-MST implementation [1.0 IQR (0.5, 2.4) to 14.6 IQR (9.6, 19) hours, p < 0.001]. The time to assessment increased [20.6 IQR (3.8, 29.5) to 34.1 IQR (16.6, 54.7) hours, p < 0.001], but the time to malnutrition diagnosis did not change [34.8 IQR (18.2, 47.8) vs. 28.1 IQR (17.3, 44.6) hours, p = 0.263]. The percentage of patients assessed increased from 4.8 % (164/3383) to 25.8 % (717/2780) (p < 0.001) and the percentage diagnosed with malnutrition increased from 5.3 % to 11 % (p < 0.001). Most registered nurses (RNs) felt that the MST improved quality of care, while RDNs did not. Most RNs reported that the MST was easy to use. The majority of RDNs felt their workflows improved. Both RNs and RDNs agreed that the process change improved collaboration.
Conclusion
MST implementation improved overall access to care. Findings from this study can be used to optimize resources to improve clinical workflows.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.