Multimodal Noninvasive Monitoring of Arterial Pressure: Do Limitations of Finger Cuff Monitoring Compromise Upper Arm Measurements? A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Cohorts.
Karim Lakhal, Jérôme E Dauvergne, Grégoire Muller, Stephan Ehrmann, Thierry Boulain
{"title":"Multimodal Noninvasive Monitoring of Arterial Pressure: Do Limitations of Finger Cuff Monitoring Compromise Upper Arm Measurements? A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Cohorts.","authors":"Karim Lakhal, Jérôme E Dauvergne, Grégoire Muller, Stephan Ehrmann, Thierry Boulain","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the reliability of conventional automated oscillometric upper arm cuff (cuffARM): 1) when finger cuff monitoring (cuffFINGER) of arterial pressure (AP) is suspected to be unreliable due to poor fingertip perfusion and/or hand edema or 2) fails to provide a reading.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study based on cohorts evaluating the CNAP (Dräger Medical) and ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences) systems.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with an arterial catheter and stable AP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three sets of triplicate AP measurements-simultaneous readings from the cuffFINGER, cuffARM and, as a reference, arterial catheter-were collected for each patient.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We analyzed 352 patients: 214 with the CNAP and 138 with the ClearSight cuffFINGER. In the 102 patients (29%) with poor fingertip perfusion-defined as a capillary refill time greater than 4 seconds-and/or hand edema, cuffARM mean AP measurements (n = 304) never failed, met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standard (bias ± sd: 2.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg), posed no or low risk of harm in 99.7% of cases, and demonstrated good ability to detect hypotension and hypertension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1], respectively). In these 102 patients, cuffFINGER failed to display a reading in 17 patients (17%), and if not, did not meet the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard. In 38 of 352 patients (11%) in whom the cuffFINGER failed to display an AP measurement, cuffARM met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP (bias ± sd: 1.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg). In the absence of failure and risk factors for erroneous measurements, ClearSight met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP, unlike the CNAP system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a multimodal, noninvasive strategy for AP monitoring, ClearSight cuffFINGER may be suitable as a first-line tool due to its continuous nature. When unreliable or unavailable, cuffARM provides reliable measurements, effectively detects hypotension and hypertension, and poses no significant risk to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the reliability of conventional automated oscillometric upper arm cuff (cuffARM): 1) when finger cuff monitoring (cuffFINGER) of arterial pressure (AP) is suspected to be unreliable due to poor fingertip perfusion and/or hand edema or 2) fails to provide a reading.
Design: Prospective observational study based on cohorts evaluating the CNAP (Dräger Medical) and ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences) systems.
Setting: Three ICUs.
Patients: Adults with an arterial catheter and stable AP.
Interventions: Three sets of triplicate AP measurements-simultaneous readings from the cuffFINGER, cuffARM and, as a reference, arterial catheter-were collected for each patient.
Measurements and main results: We analyzed 352 patients: 214 with the CNAP and 138 with the ClearSight cuffFINGER. In the 102 patients (29%) with poor fingertip perfusion-defined as a capillary refill time greater than 4 seconds-and/or hand edema, cuffARM mean AP measurements (n = 304) never failed, met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standard (bias ± sd: 2.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg), posed no or low risk of harm in 99.7% of cases, and demonstrated good ability to detect hypotension and hypertension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1], respectively). In these 102 patients, cuffFINGER failed to display a reading in 17 patients (17%), and if not, did not meet the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard. In 38 of 352 patients (11%) in whom the cuffFINGER failed to display an AP measurement, cuffARM met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP (bias ± sd: 1.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg). In the absence of failure and risk factors for erroneous measurements, ClearSight met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP, unlike the CNAP system.
Conclusions: In a multimodal, noninvasive strategy for AP monitoring, ClearSight cuffFINGER may be suitable as a first-line tool due to its continuous nature. When unreliable or unavailable, cuffARM provides reliable measurements, effectively detects hypotension and hypertension, and poses no significant risk to the patient.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.