Multimodal Noninvasive Monitoring of Arterial Pressure: Do Limitations of Finger Cuff Monitoring Compromise Upper Arm Measurements? A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Cohorts.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Karim Lakhal, Jérôme E Dauvergne, Grégoire Muller, Stephan Ehrmann, Thierry Boulain
{"title":"Multimodal Noninvasive Monitoring of Arterial Pressure: Do Limitations of Finger Cuff Monitoring Compromise Upper Arm Measurements? A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Cohorts.","authors":"Karim Lakhal, Jérôme E Dauvergne, Grégoire Muller, Stephan Ehrmann, Thierry Boulain","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the reliability of conventional automated oscillometric upper arm cuff (cuffARM): 1) when finger cuff monitoring (cuffFINGER) of arterial pressure (AP) is suspected to be unreliable due to poor fingertip perfusion and/or hand edema or 2) fails to provide a reading.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study based on cohorts evaluating the CNAP (Dräger Medical) and ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences) systems.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with an arterial catheter and stable AP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three sets of triplicate AP measurements-simultaneous readings from the cuffFINGER, cuffARM and, as a reference, arterial catheter-were collected for each patient.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We analyzed 352 patients: 214 with the CNAP and 138 with the ClearSight cuffFINGER. In the 102 patients (29%) with poor fingertip perfusion-defined as a capillary refill time greater than 4 seconds-and/or hand edema, cuffARM mean AP measurements (n = 304) never failed, met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standard (bias ± sd: 2.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg), posed no or low risk of harm in 99.7% of cases, and demonstrated good ability to detect hypotension and hypertension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1], respectively). In these 102 patients, cuffFINGER failed to display a reading in 17 patients (17%), and if not, did not meet the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard. In 38 of 352 patients (11%) in whom the cuffFINGER failed to display an AP measurement, cuffARM met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP (bias ± sd: 1.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg). In the absence of failure and risk factors for erroneous measurements, ClearSight met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP, unlike the CNAP system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a multimodal, noninvasive strategy for AP monitoring, ClearSight cuffFINGER may be suitable as a first-line tool due to its continuous nature. When unreliable or unavailable, cuffARM provides reliable measurements, effectively detects hypotension and hypertension, and poses no significant risk to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reliability of conventional automated oscillometric upper arm cuff (cuffARM): 1) when finger cuff monitoring (cuffFINGER) of arterial pressure (AP) is suspected to be unreliable due to poor fingertip perfusion and/or hand edema or 2) fails to provide a reading.

Design: Prospective observational study based on cohorts evaluating the CNAP (Dräger Medical) and ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences) systems.

Setting: Three ICUs.

Patients: Adults with an arterial catheter and stable AP.

Interventions: Three sets of triplicate AP measurements-simultaneous readings from the cuffFINGER, cuffARM and, as a reference, arterial catheter-were collected for each patient.

Measurements and main results: We analyzed 352 patients: 214 with the CNAP and 138 with the ClearSight cuffFINGER. In the 102 patients (29%) with poor fingertip perfusion-defined as a capillary refill time greater than 4 seconds-and/or hand edema, cuffARM mean AP measurements (n = 304) never failed, met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standard (bias ± sd: 2.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg), posed no or low risk of harm in 99.7% of cases, and demonstrated good ability to detect hypotension and hypertension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1], respectively). In these 102 patients, cuffFINGER failed to display a reading in 17 patients (17%), and if not, did not meet the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard. In 38 of 352 patients (11%) in whom the cuffFINGER failed to display an AP measurement, cuffARM met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP (bias ± sd: 1.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg). In the absence of failure and risk factors for erroneous measurements, ClearSight met the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for mean AP, unlike the CNAP system.

Conclusions: In a multimodal, noninvasive strategy for AP monitoring, ClearSight cuffFINGER may be suitable as a first-line tool due to its continuous nature. When unreliable or unavailable, cuffARM provides reliable measurements, effectively detects hypotension and hypertension, and poses no significant risk to the patient.

多模态无创动脉压监测:手指袖带监测的局限性会影响上臂测量吗?两个前瞻性队列的事后分析。
目的:评估传统自动振荡式上臂袖带(cuffARM)的可靠性:1)当手指袖带监测(cuffFINGER)的动脉压(AP)由于指尖灌注不良和/或手部水肿而被怀疑不可靠时,或2)无法提供读数。设计:前瞻性观察研究基于队列评估CNAP (Dräger Medical)和ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences)系统。设置:3个icu。干预措施:为每位患者收集三组三次AP测量-同时从袖指、袖臂和作为参考的动脉导管读取。测量和主要结果:我们分析了352例患者:214例使用CNAP, 138例使用ClearSight袖指。在102例(29%)指尖灌注不良(定义为毛细血管再充盈时间大于4秒)和/或手部水肿的患者中,cuffARM平均AP测量(n = 304)从未失败,符合国际标准化组织(ISO) 81060-2:2018标准(偏差±标准差:2.2±7.2 mm Hg), 99.7%的病例无或低危害风险,并表现出良好的低血压和高血压检测能力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积,分别为0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94]和0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1])。在这102例患者中,17例(17%)患者的袖手指无法显示读数,如果没有,则不符合ISO 81060-2:2018标准。352例患者中有38例(11%)cuffFINGER无法显示AP测量,但cuffARM符合ISO 81060-2:2018平均AP标准(偏差±标准差:1.7±7.1 mm Hg)。与CNAP系统不同,ClearSight在没有故障和错误测量风险因素的情况下,符合ISO 81060-2:2018平均AP标准。结论:在多模式、无创的AP监测策略中,ClearSight cuffFINGER可能适合作为一线工具,因为它具有连续性。当不可靠或不可用时,cuffARM提供可靠的测量,有效地检测低血压和高血压,并且不会对患者造成重大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信