Mortality Trends Across Key Diagnostic Groups in Australian and New Zealand ICUs Over the Past 30 Years.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Julia K Pilowsky, Ryo Ueno, Josh McLarty, David Pilcher, Michael Bailey, Alastair Brown
{"title":"Mortality Trends Across Key Diagnostic Groups in Australian and New Zealand ICUs Over the Past 30 Years.","authors":"Julia K Pilowsky, Ryo Ueno, Josh McLarty, David Pilcher, Michael Bailey, Alastair Brown","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database (APD) has been operational for 3 decades. It is important to understand how mortality outcomes have changed across diagnostic groups over time to facilitate the planning of future healthcare resources. We evaluated the trends in risk-adjusted mortality for ICU patients over the last 30 years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All ICUs in Australia and New Zealand that contributed data to the ANZICS APD from January 1993 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients (≥ 16 yr) admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The final cohort included 2,838,654 patients from 209 ICUs. Compared with the first decade patients admitted during the final decade of the study were older (60.0 yr [18.2 yr] vs. 62.0 yr [17.8 yr]), more often had a least one major comorbidity (23.2% vs. 25.2%), and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores (45.6 [28.1] vs. 50.9 [24.1]). The five diagnostic groups with the highest mortality rates were cardiac arrest (53.6%), stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (34.8%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (21.2%), pneumonia (19.2%), and sepsis (19%). Risk-adjusted mortality decreased until 2010 but then plateaued. Cardiac arrest saw the greatest improvement in risk-adjusted mortality between the third vs. first study decades (odds ratio [OR], 0.82 [0.81-0.83]), while pneumonia saw the least (OR, 0.87 [0.87-0.88]). The pattern of improvement for most diagnostic groups were similar; however, mortality from stroke and intracranial hemorrhage continued to improve, whereas mortality from cardiac arrest appears to have increased over the past 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There have been substantial improvements in risk-adjusted mortality among ICU patients over the past 30 years; however, this improvement has plateaued recently. The reasons for this plateau warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database (APD) has been operational for 3 decades. It is important to understand how mortality outcomes have changed across diagnostic groups over time to facilitate the planning of future healthcare resources. We evaluated the trends in risk-adjusted mortality for ICU patients over the last 30 years.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: All ICUs in Australia and New Zealand that contributed data to the ANZICS APD from January 1993 to December 2022.

Patients: Adult patients (≥ 16 yr) admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The final cohort included 2,838,654 patients from 209 ICUs. Compared with the first decade patients admitted during the final decade of the study were older (60.0 yr [18.2 yr] vs. 62.0 yr [17.8 yr]), more often had a least one major comorbidity (23.2% vs. 25.2%), and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores (45.6 [28.1] vs. 50.9 [24.1]). The five diagnostic groups with the highest mortality rates were cardiac arrest (53.6%), stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (34.8%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (21.2%), pneumonia (19.2%), and sepsis (19%). Risk-adjusted mortality decreased until 2010 but then plateaued. Cardiac arrest saw the greatest improvement in risk-adjusted mortality between the third vs. first study decades (odds ratio [OR], 0.82 [0.81-0.83]), while pneumonia saw the least (OR, 0.87 [0.87-0.88]). The pattern of improvement for most diagnostic groups were similar; however, mortality from stroke and intracranial hemorrhage continued to improve, whereas mortality from cardiac arrest appears to have increased over the past 10 years.

Conclusions: There have been substantial improvements in risk-adjusted mortality among ICU patients over the past 30 years; however, this improvement has plateaued recently. The reasons for this plateau warrant further investigation.

过去30年澳大利亚和新西兰icu主要诊断组的死亡率趋势
目的:澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会(ANZICS)成人患者数据库(APD)已经运行了30年。重要的是要了解死亡率结果如何随着时间的推移在诊断组中发生变化,以促进未来医疗保健资源的规划。我们评估了过去30年来ICU患者风险调整死亡率的趋势。设计:回顾性队列研究。背景:1993年1月至2022年12月,澳大利亚和新西兰所有向ANZICS APD提供数据的icu。患者:澳大利亚和新西兰icu收治的成人患者(≥16岁)。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:最终队列包括来自209个icu的2,838,654名患者。与前10年相比,在研究的最后10年入院的患者年龄更大(60.0岁[18.2岁]对62.0岁[17.8岁]),更经常有至少一种主要合并症(23.2%对25.2%),急性生理和慢性健康评估III评分更高(45.6[28.1]对50.9[24.1])。死亡率最高的5个诊断组分别是心脏骤停(53.6%)、脑卒中和颅内出血(34.8%)、蛛网膜下腔出血(21.2%)、肺炎(19.2%)和败血症(19%)。风险调整死亡率在2010年之前有所下降,但随后趋于稳定。在第三个研究阶段与第一个研究阶段相比,心脏骤停的风险调整死亡率改善最大(优势比[OR], 0.82[0.81-0.83]),而肺炎的改善最小(OR, 0.87[0.87-0.88])。大多数诊断组的改善模式是相似的;然而,中风和颅内出血的死亡率持续改善,而心脏骤停的死亡率在过去10年中似乎有所增加。结论:在过去的30年里,ICU患者的风险调整死亡率有了实质性的改善;然而,这种改善最近已经趋于稳定。高原形成的原因值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信