Lung Ultrasound Findings and Algorithms to Detect Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Testing Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Eduardo Messias Hirano Padrao, Bruno Caldeira Antonio, Tiffany Alexis Gardner, Isabele Ayumi Miyawaki, Cintia Gomes, Jose Eduardo Riceto Loyola Junior, Marianna Daibes Rachid de Andrade, Isabela Reis Marques, Isabela Azevedo Ferreira de Souza, Caroliny Hellen Azevedo da Silva, Vittoria Caporal Salles Moreira, Brian Pablo Bustos, Augusto Barreto do Amaral Neto, Jonah Rubin
{"title":"Lung Ultrasound Findings and Algorithms to Detect Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Testing Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Eduardo Messias Hirano Padrao, Bruno Caldeira Antonio, Tiffany Alexis Gardner, Isabele Ayumi Miyawaki, Cintia Gomes, Jose Eduardo Riceto Loyola Junior, Marianna Daibes Rachid de Andrade, Isabela Reis Marques, Isabela Azevedo Ferreira de Souza, Caroliny Hellen Azevedo da Silva, Vittoria Caporal Salles Moreira, Brian Pablo Bustos, Augusto Barreto do Amaral Neto, Jonah Rubin","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lung ultrasound is increasingly used for diagnosing pneumonia due to its accessibility, low cost, and lack of radiation exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of individual lung ultrasound findings and algorithms for pneumonia across various clinical settings compared with chest radiography and CT.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>We searched for studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of lung ultrasound findings and algorithms for pneumonia. Studies including adult patients with community-acquired, hospital-acquired, or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were eligible. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for ultrasonographic findings and algorithms were pooled using bivariate linear mixed models and Bayesian analyses. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twenty-six studies, totaling 3454 patients, were included. The Bed Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92) among all criteria studies, whereas dynamic air bronchograms had the highest specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99). Focal B-lines had low sensitivity (0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.43) and high specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). Sensitivity analyses indicated reduced specificity for lung ultrasound in patients with VAP across all evaluated criteria. Bayesian analyses yielded consistent results across different prior assumptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung ultrasound demonstrates good diagnostic performance for detecting community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, its utility in diagnosing VAP is limited, suggesting the need for complementary diagnostic tools in this patient group. This underscores the importance of lung ultrasound as a frontline diagnostic tool for pneumonia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of each specific finding identified by lung ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lung ultrasound is increasingly used for diagnosing pneumonia due to its accessibility, low cost, and lack of radiation exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of individual lung ultrasound findings and algorithms for pneumonia across various clinical settings compared with chest radiography and CT.

Data sources: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

Study selection and data extraction: We searched for studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of lung ultrasound findings and algorithms for pneumonia. Studies including adult patients with community-acquired, hospital-acquired, or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were eligible. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for ultrasonographic findings and algorithms were pooled using bivariate linear mixed models and Bayesian analyses. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Data synthesis: Twenty-six studies, totaling 3454 patients, were included. The Bed Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92) among all criteria studies, whereas dynamic air bronchograms had the highest specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99). Focal B-lines had low sensitivity (0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.43) and high specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). Sensitivity analyses indicated reduced specificity for lung ultrasound in patients with VAP across all evaluated criteria. Bayesian analyses yielded consistent results across different prior assumptions.

Conclusions: Lung ultrasound demonstrates good diagnostic performance for detecting community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, its utility in diagnosing VAP is limited, suggesting the need for complementary diagnostic tools in this patient group. This underscores the importance of lung ultrasound as a frontline diagnostic tool for pneumonia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of each specific finding identified by lung ultrasound.

肺部超声发现和算法检测肺炎:系统回顾和诊断测试荟萃分析。
目的:肺部超声由于其可及性、低成本和低辐射暴露等优点,越来越多地用于诊断肺炎。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估不同临床环境下个体肺部超声发现和肺炎诊断算法与胸片和CT相比的准确性。数据来源:我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库。研究选择和数据提取:我们检索了评估肺部超声检查结果和肺炎诊断算法的敏感性和特异性的研究。纳入社区获得性、医院获得性或呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的成年患者的研究符合条件。使用双变量线性混合模型和贝叶斯分析汇总超声检查结果和算法的敏感性、特异性和似然比数据。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估偏倚风险。数据综合:纳入26项研究,共3454例患者。急诊床肺超声(BLUE)方案的灵敏度最高(0.88;95% CI, 0.84-0.92),而动态空气支气管图的特异性最高(0.96;95% ci, 0.91-0.99)。焦点b线灵敏度低(0.24;95% CI, 0.12-0.43)和高特异性(0.96;95% ci, 0.86-0.99)。敏感性分析表明,在所有评估标准中,VAP患者的肺超声特异性降低。贝叶斯分析在不同的先验假设下得出了一致的结果。结论:肺部超声对社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎有较好的诊断效果。然而,它在诊断VAP方面的作用是有限的,这表明在这一患者群体中需要补充诊断工具。这强调了肺部超声作为肺炎一线诊断工具的重要性。据我们所知,这是第一个评估肺部超声识别的每个特定发现的特异性和敏感性的荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信