UK Kidney Association Clinical Practice Guideline on vascular access for haemodialysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Emma Aitken, Hameed Anijeet, Damien Ashby, Wayne Barrow, Francis Calder, Brett Dowds, Catherine Fielding, James Gilbert, Rob Jones, Narayan Karunanithy, Zaib Khawaja, Emma Roberts, Mike Robson, Rukshana Shroff, Hannah Stacey, Peter Thomson, Dan Waters
{"title":"UK Kidney Association Clinical Practice Guideline on vascular access for haemodialysis.","authors":"Emma Aitken, Hameed Anijeet, Damien Ashby, Wayne Barrow, Francis Calder, Brett Dowds, Catherine Fielding, James Gilbert, Rob Jones, Narayan Karunanithy, Zaib Khawaja, Emma Roberts, Mike Robson, Rukshana Shroff, Hannah Stacey, Peter Thomson, Dan Waters","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04374-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This guideline is written primarily for doctors and nurses working in dialysis centres and related areas of medicine in the UK, and is an update of a previous version written in 2015. It aims to provide guidance on how to provide vascular access care for patients approaching and undergoing haemodialysis, and provides a standard of care which centres should in general aim to achieve. We would not advise patients to interpret the guideline as a rulebook, but perhaps to answer the question: \"What does good quality vascular access care look like?\". The guideline is split into sections: each begins with a few statements which are graded by strength (1 is a firm recommendation, 2 is more like a sensible suggestion), and the type of research available to back up the statement, ranging from A (good quality trials so we are pretty sure this is right) to D (more like the opinion of experts than known for sure). After the statements there is a short summary explaining why we think this, often including a discussion of some of the most helpful research. There is then a list of the most important medical articles so that you can read further if you want to - most of this is freely available online, at least in summary form. A few notes on the individual sections: 1.  This section covers key concepts relevant to vascular access and focusses on access type selection, including a historical introduction and review of the key literature informing our understanding. This explains why we are moving away from the outdated advice in previous guidelines (e.g. that 'all patients should dialyse with a fistula as first choice') towards a process which treats dialysis access selection as a choice, respecting patient individuality, aiming to provide high quality assessment and advice, so that patients are supported in making informed decisions. The basic concept of the fistula as optimal access is highlighted and remains valid, but it is placed within a more modern concept of care, in which the patient is at the centre of the decision process. 2.  This section addresses the initial planning of access, from education and vein preservation, through to the timing of assessment and access formation, emphasising in particular the need to plan ahead. 3.  This section deals with the formation and routine care of AV access (fistulas and grafts), covering access type and configuration, surgical and anaesthetic technique, the maturation period (before a fistula is ready to be used), and initiation and maintenance of optimal cannulation (needling). 4.  This section deals with some of the complications of AV access. Research in this area is ongoing and not yet sufficient to give clear guidance, so we emphasise again the importance of involving patients in treatment decisions. 5.  This section deals with the placement and routine care of catheter access (lines), covering location, technique, anticoagulant locks, and regular exit site disinfection and dressings. 6.  This section deals with catheter complications, like infection and poor flow, which are sometimes life-threatening, and for which the catheter sometimes needs to be changed. 7.  This section deals with central venous stenosis (narrowing of veins deep in the chest) which is mostly a long term complication of catheters, but which is relevant to the planning of all types of access. We thought this important condition deserved its own section. Most of the concepts relevant to adult patients apply equally to children and adolescents, so there is no separate Paediatric section, and unless stated, guidance applies to children as well as adults. Where they do exist, differences are highlighted within the statements and rationale, sometimes with separate paragraphs or subheadings. Access for peritoneal dialysis is not included in this guideline since it is covered elsewhere, and the guideline is not exhaustive, with several aspects not covered, though they may be addressed in future versions. The guideline's principle focus is areas of mainstream practice for which there is variation across different UK centres, in general not covering newly developed or rarely practiced techniques, and it is not intended to replace handbooks and review articles. The guideline's main anticipated audience is NHS professionals caring for patients who are receiving or planning haemodialysis, but it is written to be as accessible as possible to patients and carers also. There are appendices at the end which explain the meaning of words and concepts which are used throughout the guideline, especially the medical and statistical terminology. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04374-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This guideline is written primarily for doctors and nurses working in dialysis centres and related areas of medicine in the UK, and is an update of a previous version written in 2015. It aims to provide guidance on how to provide vascular access care for patients approaching and undergoing haemodialysis, and provides a standard of care which centres should in general aim to achieve. We would not advise patients to interpret the guideline as a rulebook, but perhaps to answer the question: "What does good quality vascular access care look like?". The guideline is split into sections: each begins with a few statements which are graded by strength (1 is a firm recommendation, 2 is more like a sensible suggestion), and the type of research available to back up the statement, ranging from A (good quality trials so we are pretty sure this is right) to D (more like the opinion of experts than known for sure). After the statements there is a short summary explaining why we think this, often including a discussion of some of the most helpful research. There is then a list of the most important medical articles so that you can read further if you want to - most of this is freely available online, at least in summary form. A few notes on the individual sections: 1.  This section covers key concepts relevant to vascular access and focusses on access type selection, including a historical introduction and review of the key literature informing our understanding. This explains why we are moving away from the outdated advice in previous guidelines (e.g. that 'all patients should dialyse with a fistula as first choice') towards a process which treats dialysis access selection as a choice, respecting patient individuality, aiming to provide high quality assessment and advice, so that patients are supported in making informed decisions. The basic concept of the fistula as optimal access is highlighted and remains valid, but it is placed within a more modern concept of care, in which the patient is at the centre of the decision process. 2.  This section addresses the initial planning of access, from education and vein preservation, through to the timing of assessment and access formation, emphasising in particular the need to plan ahead. 3.  This section deals with the formation and routine care of AV access (fistulas and grafts), covering access type and configuration, surgical and anaesthetic technique, the maturation period (before a fistula is ready to be used), and initiation and maintenance of optimal cannulation (needling). 4.  This section deals with some of the complications of AV access. Research in this area is ongoing and not yet sufficient to give clear guidance, so we emphasise again the importance of involving patients in treatment decisions. 5.  This section deals with the placement and routine care of catheter access (lines), covering location, technique, anticoagulant locks, and regular exit site disinfection and dressings. 6.  This section deals with catheter complications, like infection and poor flow, which are sometimes life-threatening, and for which the catheter sometimes needs to be changed. 7.  This section deals with central venous stenosis (narrowing of veins deep in the chest) which is mostly a long term complication of catheters, but which is relevant to the planning of all types of access. We thought this important condition deserved its own section. Most of the concepts relevant to adult patients apply equally to children and adolescents, so there is no separate Paediatric section, and unless stated, guidance applies to children as well as adults. Where they do exist, differences are highlighted within the statements and rationale, sometimes with separate paragraphs or subheadings. Access for peritoneal dialysis is not included in this guideline since it is covered elsewhere, and the guideline is not exhaustive, with several aspects not covered, though they may be addressed in future versions. The guideline's principle focus is areas of mainstream practice for which there is variation across different UK centres, in general not covering newly developed or rarely practiced techniques, and it is not intended to replace handbooks and review articles. The guideline's main anticipated audience is NHS professionals caring for patients who are receiving or planning haemodialysis, but it is written to be as accessible as possible to patients and carers also. There are appendices at the end which explain the meaning of words and concepts which are used throughout the guideline, especially the medical and statistical terminology. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

英国肾脏协会关于血液透析血管通路的临床实践指南。
本指南主要是为在英国透析中心和相关医学领域工作的医生和护士编写的,并且是2015年编写的上一个版本的更新。它的目的是就如何为正在接受血液透析治疗的患者提供血管通路护理提供指导,并提供一个中心总体上应该力求达到的护理标准。我们不建议患者将指南理解为规则手册,但或许可以回答这样一个问题:“高质量的血管通路护理是什么样子的?”该指南分为几个部分:每个部分以一些陈述开始,根据强度(1是坚定的建议,2更像是一个明智的建议)和支持该陈述的研究类型进行评分,从a(高质量的试验,所以我们非常确定这是正确的)到D(更像是专家的意见,而不是确定的)。在陈述之后有一个简短的总结,解释为什么我们这样认为,通常包括对一些最有帮助的研究的讨论。然后有一个最重要的医学文章列表,如果你想的话,你可以进一步阅读——其中大部分都是免费的,至少以摘要的形式。关于各个部分的几点注意事项:本节涵盖与血管通路相关的关键概念,并着重于通道类型的选择,包括历史介绍和关键文献的回顾,为我们的理解提供信息。这就解释了为什么我们正在从以前的指南中过时的建议(例如,“所有患者都应以瘘管作为首选进行透析”)转向将透析途径选择视为一种选择的过程,尊重患者的个性,旨在提供高质量的评估和建议,以便支持患者做出明智的决定。瘘管作为最佳途径的基本概念得到了强调,并且仍然有效,但它被置于更现代的护理概念中,其中患者处于决策过程的中心。2。本节讨论了从教育和静脉保存到评估时间和通道形成的初步规划,特别强调了提前规划的必要性。3所示。本节讨论房室通道(瘘管和移植物)的形成和常规护理,包括通道类型和配置,手术和麻醉技术,成熟期(瘘管准备使用之前),以及启动和维持最佳插管(针刺)。4所示。本节讨论一些AV通路的并发症。该领域的研究仍在进行中,尚不足以给出明确的指导,因此我们再次强调让患者参与治疗决策的重要性。5。本节讨论导管通路(线)的放置和日常护理,包括位置、技术、抗凝锁和常规出口消毒和敷料。6。本节涉及导管并发症,如感染和血流不畅,有时会危及生命,有时需要更换导管。7所示。本节讨论中心静脉狭窄(胸腔深部静脉狭窄),这主要是导管的长期并发症,但它与所有类型通路的规划有关。我们认为这一重要条件值得单独讨论。与成人患者有关的大多数概念同样适用于儿童和青少年,因此没有单独的儿科部分,除非另有说明,指南既适用于儿童,也适用于成人。如果确实存在差异,则在陈述和理由中突出差异,有时用单独的段落或小标题。腹膜透析的获取不包括在本指南中,因为它在其他地方有涉及,而且该指南并不详尽,有几个方面没有涉及,尽管它们可能在未来的版本中得到解决。该指南的主要重点是主流实践领域,在不同的英国中心存在差异,通常不包括新开发或很少实践的技术,并且不打算取代手册和评论文章。该指南的主要预期受众是正在接受或计划进行血液透析的患者的NHS专业人员,但它的编写也尽可能使患者和护理人员能够访问。最后有附录,解释了整个指南中使用的单词和概念的含义,特别是医学和统计术语。临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信