Matthias Pierce, Emily Banwell, Stephanie Gillibrand, Margarita Panayiotou, Pamela Qualter, Luke Munford, Ola Demkowicz
{"title":"Changes in mental health of adolescents during three months of the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.","authors":"Matthias Pierce, Emily Banwell, Stephanie Gillibrand, Margarita Panayiotou, Pamela Qualter, Luke Munford, Ola Demkowicz","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the effect(s) of the COVID-19 pandemic is key for planning for future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examines change in self-reported mental health difficulties during three months of the pandemic among adolescent (10- to 15-year-olds) participants from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (waves 7, 9 and 11 of the main survey and waves 4, 5 and 8 of the COVID-19 surveys).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We focused on mental health difficulties using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), using repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to examine data among 6471 adolescents who responded to at least one survey since 2015, and 2,300 who responded to at least one COVID-19 survey during July 2020, November 2020 or March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional data showed similar mean total SDQ across surveys before and during the pandemic (range during pandemic 11.4 to 11.9; range pre-pandemic 11.1 to 11.8). Longitudinal analyses provided no evidence of mental health change compared with pre-pandemic trends (estimated change mean SDQ (β) = 0.05, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.51; <i>p</i> = 0.85), or differential sociodemographic effects, except greater effects in rural households (β = 0.67, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.41) than urban environments (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.33). Though subscales generally saw higher scores during the pandemic than before, these were consistent with pre-pandemic trends, excepting a slight improvement in conduct problems (β = -0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study offers evidence among a representative sample that mental health difficulties did not, on average, deteriorate for adolescents during three months of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Understanding the effect(s) of the COVID-19 pandemic is key for planning for future pandemics.
Aims: This study examines change in self-reported mental health difficulties during three months of the pandemic among adolescent (10- to 15-year-olds) participants from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (waves 7, 9 and 11 of the main survey and waves 4, 5 and 8 of the COVID-19 surveys).
Method: We focused on mental health difficulties using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), using repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to examine data among 6471 adolescents who responded to at least one survey since 2015, and 2,300 who responded to at least one COVID-19 survey during July 2020, November 2020 or March 2021.
Results: Repeated cross-sectional data showed similar mean total SDQ across surveys before and during the pandemic (range during pandemic 11.4 to 11.9; range pre-pandemic 11.1 to 11.8). Longitudinal analyses provided no evidence of mental health change compared with pre-pandemic trends (estimated change mean SDQ (β) = 0.05, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.51; p = 0.85), or differential sociodemographic effects, except greater effects in rural households (β = 0.67, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.41) than urban environments (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.33). Though subscales generally saw higher scores during the pandemic than before, these were consistent with pre-pandemic trends, excepting a slight improvement in conduct problems (β = -0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.40).
Conclusions: The study offers evidence among a representative sample that mental health difficulties did not, on average, deteriorate for adolescents during three months of the pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.