Changes in mental health of adolescents during three months of the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matthias Pierce, Emily Banwell, Stephanie Gillibrand, Margarita Panayiotou, Pamela Qualter, Luke Munford, Ola Demkowicz
{"title":"Changes in mental health of adolescents during three months of the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.","authors":"Matthias Pierce, Emily Banwell, Stephanie Gillibrand, Margarita Panayiotou, Pamela Qualter, Luke Munford, Ola Demkowicz","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the effect(s) of the COVID-19 pandemic is key for planning for future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examines change in self-reported mental health difficulties during three months of the pandemic among adolescent (10- to 15-year-olds) participants from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (waves 7, 9 and 11 of the main survey and waves 4, 5 and 8 of the COVID-19 surveys).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We focused on mental health difficulties using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), using repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to examine data among 6471 adolescents who responded to at least one survey since 2015, and 2,300 who responded to at least one COVID-19 survey during July 2020, November 2020 or March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional data showed similar mean total SDQ across surveys before and during the pandemic (range during pandemic 11.4 to 11.9; range pre-pandemic 11.1 to 11.8). Longitudinal analyses provided no evidence of mental health change compared with pre-pandemic trends (estimated change mean SDQ (β) = 0.05, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.51; <i>p</i> = 0.85), or differential sociodemographic effects, except greater effects in rural households (β = 0.67, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.41) than urban environments (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.33). Though subscales generally saw higher scores during the pandemic than before, these were consistent with pre-pandemic trends, excepting a slight improvement in conduct problems (β = -0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study offers evidence among a representative sample that mental health difficulties did not, on average, deteriorate for adolescents during three months of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the effect(s) of the COVID-19 pandemic is key for planning for future pandemics.

Aims: This study examines change in self-reported mental health difficulties during three months of the pandemic among adolescent (10- to 15-year-olds) participants from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (waves 7, 9 and 11 of the main survey and waves 4, 5 and 8 of the COVID-19 surveys).

Method: We focused on mental health difficulties using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), using repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to examine data among 6471 adolescents who responded to at least one survey since 2015, and 2,300 who responded to at least one COVID-19 survey during July 2020, November 2020 or March 2021.

Results: Repeated cross-sectional data showed similar mean total SDQ across surveys before and during the pandemic (range during pandemic 11.4 to 11.9; range pre-pandemic 11.1 to 11.8). Longitudinal analyses provided no evidence of mental health change compared with pre-pandemic trends (estimated change mean SDQ (β) = 0.05, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.51; p = 0.85), or differential sociodemographic effects, except greater effects in rural households (β = 0.67, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.41) than urban environments (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.33). Though subscales generally saw higher scores during the pandemic than before, these were consistent with pre-pandemic trends, excepting a slight improvement in conduct problems (β = -0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.40).

Conclusions: The study offers evidence among a representative sample that mental health difficulties did not, on average, deteriorate for adolescents during three months of the pandemic.

COVID-19大流行三个月期间青少年心理健康的变化:纵向研究
背景:了解COVID-19大流行的影响是规划未来大流行的关键。目的:本研究调查了来自英国家庭纵向研究(主要调查的第7,9和11波以及COVID-19调查的第4,5和8波)的青少年(10至15岁)参与者在大流行期间自我报告的心理健康问题的变化。方法:我们使用优势与困难问卷(SDQ)关注心理健康困难,使用重复横断面和纵向分析来检查自2015年以来至少回应一次调查的6471名青少年的数据,以及在2020年7月,2020年11月或2021年3月期间至少回应一次COVID-19调查的2300名青少年的数据。结果:重复的横断面数据显示,在大流行之前和大流行期间,各调查的平均总SDQ相似(大流行期间的范围为11.4至11.9;范围:大流行前11.1至11.8)。与大流行前的趋势相比,纵向分析没有提供心理健康变化的证据(估计变化平均SDQ (β) = 0.05, 95% CI -0.42至0.51;p = 0.85)或不同的社会人口影响,但农村家庭的影响大于城市环境(β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.69至0.33)(β = - 0.67, 95% CI -0.08至1.41)。虽然各分量表在大流行期间的得分普遍高于之前,但除了行为问题略有改善外,这些得分与大流行前的趋势一致(β = -0.26, 95% CI 0.12至0.40)。结论:这项研究在一个有代表性的样本中提供了证据,表明在大流行的三个月里,青少年的心理健康问题平均没有恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信