Collins Ogbeide, Alessandro Manfrin, Gemma Burgazzi, Florian Burgis, Anja Knäbel, Sebastian Pietz, Nina Röder, Alexis Pieter Roodt, Verena C. Schreiner, Klaus Schwenk, Mirco Bundschuh, Ralf Schulz
{"title":"Flow Reduction in a Pesticide-Exposed Stream Mesocosm Affects Emerging Aquatic Insects and Alters Riparian Spider Communities","authors":"Collins Ogbeide, Alessandro Manfrin, Gemma Burgazzi, Florian Burgis, Anja Knäbel, Sebastian Pietz, Nina Röder, Alexis Pieter Roodt, Verena C. Schreiner, Klaus Schwenk, Mirco Bundschuh, Ralf Schulz","doi":"10.1007/s00244-025-01146-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water scarcity can intensify streamflow reduction, alter hydromorphology, increase chemical pollution, and disrupt resource exchange between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. However, the effects of streamflow reduction on pesticide concentrations in sediment, and how these changes influence aquatic insect emergence and riparian spider communities, remain poorly understood. We conducted a 39-day mesocosm experiment in Southwest Germany using 12 artificial stream mesocosm with adjacent riparian areas, randomly assigned to low-flow (0.4 L s<sup>−1</sup>) treatment or control (1 L s<sup>−1</sup>) to simulate flow alteration. We sampled water daily (47 days), sediment (weeks 4 and 6), emerging insects (weekly for 5 weeks), and riparian spiders (week 6). Our results show that under low-flow conditions, the mean sediment pesticide concentrations increased slightly stronger from week 4 to week 6, compared to the control. However, the high variability within treatments resulted in no significant differences between the treatments. Low flow caused a 2.9-fold reduction in the total abundance of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT), while total emerging insects (abundance and biomass) and spider abundance were not affected significantly. However, the web-building spider <i>Tetragnatha</i> sp. was 2.6-fold less abundant under low-flow conditions, likely due to vegetation–habitat-related responses and reduced EPT abundance, while the ground-hunting Lycosidae were unaffected, owing to their active hunting behavior and generalist strategy. These findings highlight the need to consider cross-ecosystem effects when assessing the ecological impacts of hydrological alterations in contaminated aquatic ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8377,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":"89 2","pages":"125 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00244-025-01146-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-025-01146-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water scarcity can intensify streamflow reduction, alter hydromorphology, increase chemical pollution, and disrupt resource exchange between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. However, the effects of streamflow reduction on pesticide concentrations in sediment, and how these changes influence aquatic insect emergence and riparian spider communities, remain poorly understood. We conducted a 39-day mesocosm experiment in Southwest Germany using 12 artificial stream mesocosm with adjacent riparian areas, randomly assigned to low-flow (0.4 L s−1) treatment or control (1 L s−1) to simulate flow alteration. We sampled water daily (47 days), sediment (weeks 4 and 6), emerging insects (weekly for 5 weeks), and riparian spiders (week 6). Our results show that under low-flow conditions, the mean sediment pesticide concentrations increased slightly stronger from week 4 to week 6, compared to the control. However, the high variability within treatments resulted in no significant differences between the treatments. Low flow caused a 2.9-fold reduction in the total abundance of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT), while total emerging insects (abundance and biomass) and spider abundance were not affected significantly. However, the web-building spider Tetragnatha sp. was 2.6-fold less abundant under low-flow conditions, likely due to vegetation–habitat-related responses and reduced EPT abundance, while the ground-hunting Lycosidae were unaffected, owing to their active hunting behavior and generalist strategy. These findings highlight the need to consider cross-ecosystem effects when assessing the ecological impacts of hydrological alterations in contaminated aquatic ecosystems.
水资源短缺会加剧流量减少,改变水文形态,增加化学污染,破坏水生和陆地生态系统之间的资源交换。然而,河流流量减少对沉积物中农药浓度的影响,以及这些变化如何影响水生昆虫的出现和河岸蜘蛛群落,仍然知之甚少。我们在德国西南部进行了一项为期39天的中游环境实验,使用12个人工河流中游环境与邻近的河岸区,随机分配为低流量(0.4 L s-1)处理或对照(1 L s-1),以模拟流量变化。我们每天采样水(47天),沉积物(第4周和第6周),新出现的昆虫(每周一次,连续5周)和河岸蜘蛛(第6周)。结果表明,在低流量条件下,第4周至第6周,平均底泥农药浓度较对照增加稍强。然而,处理内的高变异性导致处理之间没有显著差异。低流量导致蜉蝣目、翼翅目和毛翅目(EPT)总丰度降低2.9倍,而总新出昆虫(丰度和生物量)和蜘蛛丰度未受显著影响。然而,在低流量条件下,建网蜘蛛Tetragnatha sp.的丰度减少了2.6倍,这可能是由于植被-栖息地相关的响应和EPT丰度的减少,而地面捕食的Lycosidae则由于其积极的狩猎行为和通才策略而不受影响。这些发现突出表明,在评估受污染水生生态系统水文变化的生态影响时,需要考虑跨生态系统效应。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology provides a place for the publication of timely, detailed, and definitive scientific studies pertaining to the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. The journal will consider submissions dealing with new analytical and toxicological techniques that advance our understanding of the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. AECT will now consider mini-reviews (where length including references is less than 5,000 words), which highlight case studies, a geographic topic of interest, or a timely subject of debate. AECT will also consider Special Issues on subjects of broad interest. The journal strongly encourages authors to ensure that their submission places a strong emphasis on ecosystem processes; submissions limited to technical aspects of such areas as toxicity testing for single chemicals, wastewater effluent characterization, human occupation exposure, or agricultural phytotoxicity are unlikely to be considered.