PrEP and PEP for HIV Prevention Among Gay, Bisexual, and MSM in Brazil: Findings from the SMESH Study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ben Hur Graboski Pinheiro, Thayane Martins Dornelles, Gustavo Eidt, Emerson Silveira de Brito, Rafael Steffens Martins, Giovana Petracco de Miranda, Natalia Luiza Kops, Suelen Porto Basgalupp, Flávia Moreno Alves de Souza, Gerson Fernando Mendes Pereira, Maiko Luis Tonini, Eliana Marcia Wendland
{"title":"PrEP and PEP for HIV Prevention Among Gay, Bisexual, and MSM in Brazil: Findings from the SMESH Study.","authors":"Ben Hur Graboski Pinheiro, Thayane Martins Dornelles, Gustavo Eidt, Emerson Silveira de Brito, Rafael Steffens Martins, Giovana Petracco de Miranda, Natalia Luiza Kops, Suelen Porto Basgalupp, Flávia Moreno Alves de Souza, Gerson Fernando Mendes Pereira, Maiko Luis Tonini, Eliana Marcia Wendland","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04853-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The HIV epidemic remains a global concern, particularly among vulnerable populations. Effective strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), are crucial to reducing HIV transmission. This study assessed HIV prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil, examined associated factors, and evaluated perceptions regarding access through the public healthcare system (SUS). A cross-sectional study (2019-2023) was conducted using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in ten state capitals across five Brazilian regions. Eligible participants were men aged ≥ 18 years, identifying as MSM, who reported oral or anal sex with another man in the past 12 months. Data were collected via structured questionnaires on socio-behavioral characteristics. Descriptive analyses used RDS-II estimators, and associations with prophylaxis use were examined using survey-weighted Poisson regression. Among 1,139 participants, 21.4% reported PrEP use and 20.5% reported PEP use. PrEP uptake was significantly lower among individuals identifying as pardo (PR = 0.58 [95% CI 0.36-0.92]), with no significant associations found for education or social class. Both PrEP and PEP use were positively associated with having more than five sexual partners in the past six months and with having a partner living with HIV. Notably, 86.3% of participants (95% CI 81.1-91.6) expressed willingness to access PrEP through SUS. Despite high willingness, PrEP uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among pardo MSM. These findings underscore the urgency of targeted public policies to expand equitable access to HIV prevention services in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04853-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The HIV epidemic remains a global concern, particularly among vulnerable populations. Effective strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), are crucial to reducing HIV transmission. This study assessed HIV prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil, examined associated factors, and evaluated perceptions regarding access through the public healthcare system (SUS). A cross-sectional study (2019-2023) was conducted using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in ten state capitals across five Brazilian regions. Eligible participants were men aged ≥ 18 years, identifying as MSM, who reported oral or anal sex with another man in the past 12 months. Data were collected via structured questionnaires on socio-behavioral characteristics. Descriptive analyses used RDS-II estimators, and associations with prophylaxis use were examined using survey-weighted Poisson regression. Among 1,139 participants, 21.4% reported PrEP use and 20.5% reported PEP use. PrEP uptake was significantly lower among individuals identifying as pardo (PR = 0.58 [95% CI 0.36-0.92]), with no significant associations found for education or social class. Both PrEP and PEP use were positively associated with having more than five sexual partners in the past six months and with having a partner living with HIV. Notably, 86.3% of participants (95% CI 81.1-91.6) expressed willingness to access PrEP through SUS. Despite high willingness, PrEP uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among pardo MSM. These findings underscore the urgency of targeted public policies to expand equitable access to HIV prevention services in Brazil.

巴西同性恋、双性恋和男男性行为者预防艾滋病毒的PrEP和PEP:来自SMESH研究的结果。
艾滋病毒流行病仍然是全球关注的问题,特别是在弱势群体中。暴露前预防(PrEP)和暴露后预防(PEP)等有效策略对于减少艾滋病毒传播至关重要。本研究评估了巴西男男性行为者(MSM)的艾滋病毒预防使用情况,检查了相关因素,并评估了通过公共医疗保健系统(SUS)获得艾滋病毒预防的看法。采用受访者驱动抽样(RDS)在巴西五个地区的十个州首府进行了一项横断面研究(2019-2023)。符合条件的参与者是年龄≥18岁的男性,确定为MSM,在过去12个月内报告与另一名男性发生口交或肛交。数据通过结构化的社会行为特征问卷收集。描述性分析使用RDS-II估计器,并使用调查加权泊松回归检查与预防使用的关联。在1139名参与者中,21.4%报告使用PrEP, 20.5%报告使用PEP。在被认定为pardo的个体中,PrEP的摄取明显较低(PR = 0.58 [95% CI 0.36-0.92]),与教育或社会阶层没有显著关联。使用PrEP和PEP与在过去6个月内拥有5名以上性伴侣以及有一名性伴侣感染艾滋病毒呈正相关。值得注意的是,86.3%的参与者(95% CI 81.1-91.6)表示愿意通过SUS获得PrEP。尽管有很高的意愿,但PrEP的使用仍然不是最佳的,特别是在轻度男男性接触者中。这些发现强调了在巴西制定有针对性的公共政策以扩大公平获得艾滋病毒预防服务的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信