Extensive Introgression Failed to Erode Species Boundaries Among Multiple Sympatric Closely Related Species of Roscoea

IF 3.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Hong-Fan Chen, Ryan Andrew Folk, Ya-Li Wang, Wen-Jing Wang, Guo-Jun Shao, Mei-Yuan Huang, Xiang-Qin Yu, Li Li, Jian-Li Zhao
{"title":"Extensive Introgression Failed to Erode Species Boundaries Among Multiple Sympatric Closely Related Species of Roscoea","authors":"Hong-Fan Chen,&nbsp;Ryan Andrew Folk,&nbsp;Ya-Li Wang,&nbsp;Wen-Jing Wang,&nbsp;Guo-Jun Shao,&nbsp;Mei-Yuan Huang,&nbsp;Xiang-Qin Yu,&nbsp;Li Li,&nbsp;Jian-Li Zhao","doi":"10.1111/mec.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>How species boundaries are maintained among sympatric closely related species experiencing gene flow is a puzzling question in evolutionary biology. Although introgression is commonly documented, the dynamics and gene function of introgression have rarely been explored to probe why frequent introgression does not necessarily destroy species boundaries in sympatry. In this study, we employ whole-genome resequencing data to examine introgression among five closely related species of <i>Roscoea</i> that coexist in a ‘sky island’ with seventeen distinct morphological traits. Our findings reveal that introgression has led to the phylogenomic discordance between nuclear and chloroplast genomes among these morphologically distinct species. Additionally, introgression is predominantly asymmetrical in both intensity and gene function, particularly concerning recombination. Notably, the majority of gene functions associated with introgressed loci are unrelated to reproductive processes. Our results suggest that closely related species with incomplete allele assortment can coexist despite theoretical predictions, highlighting the semipermeable nature of species boundaries as reproductive isolation develops. This provides a critical conceptual framework for understanding the interplay between introgression and species persistence. Our finding offers insights into how related sympatric species boundaries can be maintained in the face of frequent asymmetrical gene introgression.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":"34 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.70083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How species boundaries are maintained among sympatric closely related species experiencing gene flow is a puzzling question in evolutionary biology. Although introgression is commonly documented, the dynamics and gene function of introgression have rarely been explored to probe why frequent introgression does not necessarily destroy species boundaries in sympatry. In this study, we employ whole-genome resequencing data to examine introgression among five closely related species of Roscoea that coexist in a ‘sky island’ with seventeen distinct morphological traits. Our findings reveal that introgression has led to the phylogenomic discordance between nuclear and chloroplast genomes among these morphologically distinct species. Additionally, introgression is predominantly asymmetrical in both intensity and gene function, particularly concerning recombination. Notably, the majority of gene functions associated with introgressed loci are unrelated to reproductive processes. Our results suggest that closely related species with incomplete allele assortment can coexist despite theoretical predictions, highlighting the semipermeable nature of species boundaries as reproductive isolation develops. This provides a critical conceptual framework for understanding the interplay between introgression and species persistence. Our finding offers insights into how related sympatric species boundaries can be maintained in the face of frequent asymmetrical gene introgression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

罗斯科多同域近缘种间广泛渗入未能侵蚀种界。
在经历基因流动的同域亲缘物种之间,物种边界如何维持是进化生物学中一个令人困惑的问题。虽然基因渐渗现象有文献记载,但很少有人探讨基因渐渗的动力学和基因功能,以探究为什么频繁的基因渐渗并不一定会破坏同栖物种的边界。在这项研究中,我们使用全基因组重测序数据来检查在“天空岛”中共存的五个密切相关的罗斯科亚物种之间的基因渗透,这些物种具有17种不同的形态特征。我们的研究结果表明,在这些形态不同的物种中,基因渗入导致了核基因组和叶绿体基因组之间的系统基因组不一致。此外,渗入在强度和基因功能上主要是不对称的,特别是在重组方面。值得注意的是,与基因渗入位点相关的大多数基因功能与生殖过程无关。我们的研究结果表明,尽管有理论预测,但等位基因不完全分类的近亲物种可以共存,突出了随着生殖隔离的发展,物种边界的半渗透性。这为理解基因渗入和物种持久性之间的相互作用提供了一个关键的概念框架。我们的发现提供了在面对频繁的不对称基因渗入时,如何维持相关的同域物种边界的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology
Molecular Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
472
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include: * population structure and phylogeography * reproductive strategies * relatedness and kin selection * sex allocation * population genetic theory * analytical methods development * conservation genetics * speciation genetics * microbial biodiversity * evolutionary dynamics of QTLs * ecological interactions * molecular adaptation and environmental genomics * impact of genetically modified organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信