The importance of sample preparation method in testing air jet removal efficiencies of trace explosive particles relevant to non-contact sampling †

IF 2.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Robert Fletcher, Alexander Bulk, Matthew Staymates and Greg Gillen
{"title":"The importance of sample preparation method in testing air jet removal efficiencies of trace explosive particles relevant to non-contact sampling †","authors":"Robert Fletcher, Alexander Bulk, Matthew Staymates and Greg Gillen","doi":"10.1039/D5AY00372E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In particular, we study the influence of sample preparation methods on the removal efficiency of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) particles from clean glass slides <em>via</em> air jet impingement. Five different sample preparation methods are investigated covering a range of potential contamination scenarios. These include (1) dry sieve, (2) artificial fingerprint without sebum, (3) artificial fingerprint with sebum, (4) dry transfer and (5) direct pipetting of an aqueous suspension. Results show clear differences in RDX particle removal efficiency with sample preparation method, with a range from undetectable to almost 90%. A custom aerodynamic sampling testbed was developed for the testing that tightly controls air jet pressure, standoff distance and impingement angle while minimizing particle losses to the lab environment. Differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy was used to image RDX particles ranging in diameter from 5 μm to over 100 μm before and after jet impingement, with semi-automated post-processing used to determine total particle removal efficiency. The results of this study suggest that testing and evaluation procedures used for trace contraband screening systems that utilize non-contact aerodynamic sampling should consider the role of test sample preparation when designing and defining testing methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" 37","pages":" 7402-7408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d5ay00372e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In particular, we study the influence of sample preparation methods on the removal efficiency of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) particles from clean glass slides via air jet impingement. Five different sample preparation methods are investigated covering a range of potential contamination scenarios. These include (1) dry sieve, (2) artificial fingerprint without sebum, (3) artificial fingerprint with sebum, (4) dry transfer and (5) direct pipetting of an aqueous suspension. Results show clear differences in RDX particle removal efficiency with sample preparation method, with a range from undetectable to almost 90%. A custom aerodynamic sampling testbed was developed for the testing that tightly controls air jet pressure, standoff distance and impingement angle while minimizing particle losses to the lab environment. Differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy was used to image RDX particles ranging in diameter from 5 μm to over 100 μm before and after jet impingement, with semi-automated post-processing used to determine total particle removal efficiency. The results of this study suggest that testing and evaluation procedures used for trace contraband screening systems that utilize non-contact aerodynamic sampling should consider the role of test sample preparation when designing and defining testing methodologies.

Abstract Image

样品制备方法在测试非接触取样中微量爆炸颗粒的空气射流去除效率中的重要性。
特别地,我们研究了样品制备方法对空气射流对干净玻片中环三甲基三胺(RDX)颗粒去除效率的影响。研究了五种不同的样品制备方法,涵盖了一系列潜在的污染情况。这些包括(1)干筛,(2)无皮脂的人工指纹,(3)有皮脂的人工指纹,(4)干转移和(5)水悬浮液的直接移液。结果表明,样品制备方法对RDX颗粒的去除率差异明显,从无法检测到几乎90%。定制的空气动力学采样测试平台可以严格控制空气喷射压力、距离和撞击角度,同时最大限度地减少颗粒对实验室环境的损失。采用差分干涉对比(DIC)光学显微镜对射流撞击前后直径从5 μm到100 μm以上的RDX颗粒进行成像,并采用半自动化后处理来确定总颗粒去除效率。本研究的结果表明,在设计和定义测试方法时,使用非接触式空气动力学采样的痕量违禁品筛选系统的测试和评估程序应考虑测试样品制备的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Methods
Analytical Methods CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
569
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Early applied demonstrations of new analytical methods with clear societal impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信