Differentiation between Setaria pumila (yellow foxtail) and Setaria parviflora (knotroot foxtail) via morphological characteristics and genetic markers

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI:10.1002/csc2.70117
Mikerly Mistral Joseph, Jinesh Patel, Claudia A. Rutland, Curtis J. Hansen, J. Scott McElroy
{"title":"Differentiation between Setaria pumila (yellow foxtail) and Setaria parviflora (knotroot foxtail) via morphological characteristics and genetic markers","authors":"Mikerly Mistral Joseph,&nbsp;Jinesh Patel,&nbsp;Claudia A. Rutland,&nbsp;Curtis J. Hansen,&nbsp;J. Scott McElroy","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail are problematic weed species in turfgrass that are often mistaken for one another due to their similar morphology. Yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail have phenotypic plasticity inter- and intraspecies, which can bias their identification. Accurate identification in the early growth stage is challenging as key traits like rhizomes appear late or are absent. Previous research showed they responded differently to several herbicides within the limited options for selective control in warm-season turfgrass. Research was conducted to evaluate the use of genetic markers for differentiating biotypes of yellow foxtail, knotroot foxtail, giant foxtail, green foxtail, and some unknown foxtails collected in Alabama. Extracted DNA was amplified with polymerase chain reaction targeting <i>trnH-psbA</i>, <i>atpB-rbcL</i>, maturase K (<i>matK</i>), and internal transcribed spacer (<i>ITS</i>) regions. Sanger sequencing, except for <i>trnH-psbA</i>, revealed single-nucleotide polymorphisms distinguishing the two species. Evolutionary analysis of the concatenation of those DNA regions revealed that yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail cluster in one clade, while green foxtail and giant foxtail belong to two distinct clades. This study demonstrated that applying these DNA barcodes except <i>trnH-psbA</i> is relevant in accurately identifying early, aiding proper identification before herbicide selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail are problematic weed species in turfgrass that are often mistaken for one another due to their similar morphology. Yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail have phenotypic plasticity inter- and intraspecies, which can bias their identification. Accurate identification in the early growth stage is challenging as key traits like rhizomes appear late or are absent. Previous research showed they responded differently to several herbicides within the limited options for selective control in warm-season turfgrass. Research was conducted to evaluate the use of genetic markers for differentiating biotypes of yellow foxtail, knotroot foxtail, giant foxtail, green foxtail, and some unknown foxtails collected in Alabama. Extracted DNA was amplified with polymerase chain reaction targeting trnH-psbA, atpB-rbcL, maturase K (matK), and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Sanger sequencing, except for trnH-psbA, revealed single-nucleotide polymorphisms distinguishing the two species. Evolutionary analysis of the concatenation of those DNA regions revealed that yellow foxtail and knotroot foxtail cluster in one clade, while green foxtail and giant foxtail belong to two distinct clades. This study demonstrated that applying these DNA barcodes except trnH-psbA is relevant in accurately identifying early, aiding proper identification before herbicide selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

黄尾狗尾草(Setaria pumila)和小黄尾狗尾草(Setaria parviflora)形态特征和遗传标记的鉴别
黄狐尾和黄狐尾是草坪草中有问题的杂草物种,由于它们的形态相似,经常被误认为是彼此。黄尾狐和黄尾狐在种间和种内具有表型可塑性,这可能会影响它们的鉴定。由于根茎等关键性状出现较晚或不存在,因此在生长早期进行准确鉴定具有挑战性。先前的研究表明,在暖季草坪草有限的选择性控制下,它们对几种除草剂的反应不同。研究了在美国阿拉巴马州采集的黄狐尾、黄根狐尾、巨狐尾、绿狐尾和一些未知狐尾的生物型鉴别方法。用聚合酶链反应扩增提取的DNA,靶向trnH-psbA、atpB-rbcL、成熟酶K (matK)和内部转录间隔区(ITS)。Sanger测序显示,除了trnH-psbA外,两个物种之间存在单核苷酸多态性。对这些DNA区域序列的进化分析表明,黄狐尾和根毛狐尾聚在一个分支中,而绿狐尾和巨狐尾则属于两个不同的分支。本研究表明,除trnH-psbA外,应用这些DNA条形码有助于在除草剂选择前进行准确的早期鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信