Different Macroevolutionary Trajectories Lead to Contrasting Ecogeographical Patterns in Two Widespread Frog Radiations

IF 6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Helena Martínez-Gil, Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou, Urtzi Enriquez-Urzelai
{"title":"Different Macroevolutionary Trajectories Lead to Contrasting Ecogeographical Patterns in Two Widespread Frog Radiations","authors":"Helena Martínez-Gil,&nbsp;Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou,&nbsp;Urtzi Enriquez-Urzelai","doi":"10.1111/geb.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Large-scale evolutionary radiations often occur through marked climatic gradients, which can promote morphological variation. However, opposite trends to the well-known ecogeographical rules can be observed in closely related clades across different geographic regions. Here, we compared macroscale patterns of morphological diversification between two geographically separated evolutionary radiations of widespread frogs to assess how morphological diversity has arisen and tested whether distinct ecogeographical rules operate at broad spatial scales.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eurasia and America.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>~ 50 Mya.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p><i>Rana</i> and <i>Lithobates</i> genera.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We combined phylogenetic, morphological, climatic, and microhabitat data for 65 species of <i>Rana</i> and <i>Lithobates</i> and used phylogenetic comparative methods to identify which factors have played a major role in the phenotypic diversification of the two radiations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Morphological evolution in Eurasian subclades closely followed phylogenetic relatedness, with slow and constant rates of body size diversification through time. By contrast, American species showed accelerated rates of body size evolution in one subclade. Adaptive models (OU) best explained the morphological evolution of this radiation despite the lack of significant correlations with climatic variables, suggesting that selective pressures might have driven adaptation. Discordant ecogeographical trends were also found between radiations: Eurasian species followed Bergmann's rule and the water conservation hypothesis, while no clear trend was observed among American species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, different evolutionary trajectories between the two radiations lead to contrasting ecogeographical patterns, highlighting that distinct selective pressures and adaptive mechanisms can play very different roles in the evolution of phylogenetically related clades. Our research demonstrates that ecogeographical rules should not be considered universally applicable but rather context-dependent, and that widespread radiations are valuable systems to uncover mechanisms regulating these general patterns and potential constraints hindering their emergence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Large-scale evolutionary radiations often occur through marked climatic gradients, which can promote morphological variation. However, opposite trends to the well-known ecogeographical rules can be observed in closely related clades across different geographic regions. Here, we compared macroscale patterns of morphological diversification between two geographically separated evolutionary radiations of widespread frogs to assess how morphological diversity has arisen and tested whether distinct ecogeographical rules operate at broad spatial scales.

Location

Eurasia and America.

Time Period

~ 50 Mya.

Major Taxa Studied

Rana and Lithobates genera.

Methods

We combined phylogenetic, morphological, climatic, and microhabitat data for 65 species of Rana and Lithobates and used phylogenetic comparative methods to identify which factors have played a major role in the phenotypic diversification of the two radiations.

Results

Morphological evolution in Eurasian subclades closely followed phylogenetic relatedness, with slow and constant rates of body size diversification through time. By contrast, American species showed accelerated rates of body size evolution in one subclade. Adaptive models (OU) best explained the morphological evolution of this radiation despite the lack of significant correlations with climatic variables, suggesting that selective pressures might have driven adaptation. Discordant ecogeographical trends were also found between radiations: Eurasian species followed Bergmann's rule and the water conservation hypothesis, while no clear trend was observed among American species.

Main Conclusions

Overall, different evolutionary trajectories between the two radiations lead to contrasting ecogeographical patterns, highlighting that distinct selective pressures and adaptive mechanisms can play very different roles in the evolution of phylogenetically related clades. Our research demonstrates that ecogeographical rules should not be considered universally applicable but rather context-dependent, and that widespread radiations are valuable systems to uncover mechanisms regulating these general patterns and potential constraints hindering their emergence.

Abstract Image

不同的宏观进化轨迹导致两个广泛分布的青蛙辐射中不同的生态地理模式
目的大尺度演化辐射往往发生在明显的气候梯度中,能促进形态变异。然而,在不同地理区域的亲缘关系密切的分支中,可以观察到与众所周知的生态地理规律相反的趋势。在这里,我们比较了两个地理上分离的广泛分布的青蛙进化辐射之间形态多样化的宏观模式,以评估形态多样性是如何产生的,并测试了不同的生态地理规则是否在广泛的空间尺度上起作用。地理位置欧亚大陆和美洲。时间周期~ 5亿年前Rana和Lithobates属的主要分类群研究。方法结合65种蛙类和石贝类的系统发育、形态、气候和微生境资料,采用系统发育比较的方法确定在两种辐射的表型多样化中起主要作用的因素。结果欧亚亚枝的形态进化密切遵循系统发育亲缘关系,随着时间的推移,体型的变化速度缓慢而恒定。相比之下,美洲物种在一个亚枝上的体型进化速度加快。适应性模型(OU)最好地解释了这种辐射的形态进化,尽管与气候变量缺乏显著的相关性,这表明选择压力可能驱动了适应。不同辐射之间的生态地理趋势也不一致:欧亚物种遵循Bergmann规则和水分保持假说,而美洲物种没有明显的趋势。总体而言,两种辐射的不同进化轨迹导致了不同的生态地理格局,这表明不同的选择压力和适应机制在系统发育相关枝的进化中可能起着截然不同的作用。我们的研究表明,生态地理规则不应该被认为是普遍适用的,而是依赖于环境的,广泛的辐射是有价值的系统,可以揭示调节这些一般模式的机制和阻碍它们出现的潜在限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信