Developing predictive models of riparian buffer efficacy with meta-analysis

Q2 Environmental Science
Rosamar Ayala-Torres , Lee H. Dietterich , Samantha Wiest , S. Kyle McKay
{"title":"Developing predictive models of riparian buffer efficacy with meta-analysis","authors":"Rosamar Ayala-Torres ,&nbsp;Lee H. Dietterich ,&nbsp;Samantha Wiest ,&nbsp;S. Kyle McKay","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riparian ecosystems have been extensively studied worldwide to determine the influence of buffer width on riparian-stream interactions, including water quality and biodiversity. Many recommendations have emerged from literature synthesis regarding the buffer widths necessary to conserve riparian functions. This study conducts a meta-analysis of buffer width efficacy, aiming to develop recommendations for protecting and restoring riparian areas. Existing studies reporting the effect of varying riparian buffer widths on water quality (i.e., pollutant retention) and biodiversity outcomes (i.e., relative species richness) were compiled. Results indicate a strong, significant positive correlation between buffer width and pollutant retention and by their constituents (<em>n</em> = 30 studies, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), with tree vegetation types and lower slopes increasing retention effectiveness. Biodiversity measures showed a moderate positive correlation with buffer width (<em>n</em> = 41, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Based on logarithmic models of buffer efficacy, a 15 m corridor width retains 67 % of pollutant inputs from upland sources and supports about 79 % of the species richness compared to larger reference buffers. Most studies on water quality improvement focused on reducing nutrients and sediment loads, suggesting emergent pollutants (e.g., microplastics) as potential future research. Similarly, most biodiversity studies focused on invertebrate taxa, suggesting the need for diverse taxonomic studies. Overall, the meta-analysis concludes a strong positive correlation between buffer widths and improvements in water quality and biodiversity, underscoring the importance of functional riparian buffers. Through meta-regression, simple models are provided as a first-order tool for scientists and decision-makers to estimate effective riparian buffer widths.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025001775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Riparian ecosystems have been extensively studied worldwide to determine the influence of buffer width on riparian-stream interactions, including water quality and biodiversity. Many recommendations have emerged from literature synthesis regarding the buffer widths necessary to conserve riparian functions. This study conducts a meta-analysis of buffer width efficacy, aiming to develop recommendations for protecting and restoring riparian areas. Existing studies reporting the effect of varying riparian buffer widths on water quality (i.e., pollutant retention) and biodiversity outcomes (i.e., relative species richness) were compiled. Results indicate a strong, significant positive correlation between buffer width and pollutant retention and by their constituents (n = 30 studies, p < 0.0001), with tree vegetation types and lower slopes increasing retention effectiveness. Biodiversity measures showed a moderate positive correlation with buffer width (n = 41, p < 0.0001). Based on logarithmic models of buffer efficacy, a 15 m corridor width retains 67 % of pollutant inputs from upland sources and supports about 79 % of the species richness compared to larger reference buffers. Most studies on water quality improvement focused on reducing nutrients and sediment loads, suggesting emergent pollutants (e.g., microplastics) as potential future research. Similarly, most biodiversity studies focused on invertebrate taxa, suggesting the need for diverse taxonomic studies. Overall, the meta-analysis concludes a strong positive correlation between buffer widths and improvements in water quality and biodiversity, underscoring the importance of functional riparian buffers. Through meta-regression, simple models are provided as a first-order tool for scientists and decision-makers to estimate effective riparian buffer widths.
建立河岸缓冲效能的meta分析预测模型
河岸生态系统已经在世界范围内进行了广泛的研究,以确定缓冲宽度对河岸-溪流相互作用的影响,包括水质和生物多样性。从文献综合中产生了许多关于保护河岸功能所必需的缓冲区宽度的建议。本研究对缓冲区宽度有效性进行了荟萃分析,旨在为保护和恢复河岸区提出建议。现有研究报告了不同的河岸缓冲宽度对水质(即污染物滞留)和生物多样性结果(即相对物种丰富度)的影响。结果表明,缓冲带宽度与污染物滞留及其组成之间存在显著的正相关关系(n = 30项研究,p <;0.0001),树木植被类型和较低的坡度增加了保留率。生物多样性措施与缓冲区宽度呈中等正相关(n = 41, p <;0.0001)。根据缓冲区效能的对数模型,与较大的参考缓冲区相比,15米的走廊宽度保留了67%的高地污染源输入,并支持了约79%的物种丰富度。大多数关于水质改善的研究都集中在减少营养物和沉积物负荷上,这表明新兴污染物(如微塑料)是未来潜在的研究方向。同样,大多数生物多样性研究集中在无脊椎动物分类群上,这表明需要进行多样化的分类研究。总体而言,荟萃分析得出缓冲区宽度与水质和生物多样性改善之间存在强烈的正相关关系,强调了功能性河岸缓冲区的重要性。通过元回归,为科学家和决策者估计有效的河岸缓冲宽度提供了一个简单的一阶工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信