Is my red the same as your red? Improving the communication of stock status and support for management in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission with specific recommendations for Indian Ocean skipjack
Gorka Merino , Agurtzane Urtizberea , Giancarlo M. Correa , Hilario Murua , Ane Laborda , Haritz Arrizabalaga , María Jaume , Josu Santiago
{"title":"Is my red the same as your red? Improving the communication of stock status and support for management in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission with specific recommendations for Indian Ocean skipjack","authors":"Gorka Merino , Agurtzane Urtizberea , Giancarlo M. Correa , Hilario Murua , Ane Laborda , Haritz Arrizabalaga , María Jaume , Josu Santiago","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fisheries management is based on the status of fish stocks and the scientific advice developed from stock assessments. Scientific advice is communicated using tables and figures and is often summarized using colors, which are a powerful tool to communicate information and trigger decision-making. However, a common understanding of what colors and stock status categories represent is necessary to ensure the adoption of scientifically sound management measures. We show that the characterization of the status of Indian Ocean skipjack tuna stock is flawed due to the inconsistent combination of overarching fishery principles (maximum use of stocks’ productivity and reduction of risk) and the inaccurate representation of the scientific evidence available from recent stock assessments. Furthermore, we discuss how the general principles of fisheries management are applied in tuna RFMOs and propose a way forward for improving the communication of the status of tuna stocks in general. This discussion paper is specifically focused on Indian Ocean skipjack and aims at improving the management framework of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. However, our conclusions are applicable to fisheries management worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X2500291X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fisheries management is based on the status of fish stocks and the scientific advice developed from stock assessments. Scientific advice is communicated using tables and figures and is often summarized using colors, which are a powerful tool to communicate information and trigger decision-making. However, a common understanding of what colors and stock status categories represent is necessary to ensure the adoption of scientifically sound management measures. We show that the characterization of the status of Indian Ocean skipjack tuna stock is flawed due to the inconsistent combination of overarching fishery principles (maximum use of stocks’ productivity and reduction of risk) and the inaccurate representation of the scientific evidence available from recent stock assessments. Furthermore, we discuss how the general principles of fisheries management are applied in tuna RFMOs and propose a way forward for improving the communication of the status of tuna stocks in general. This discussion paper is specifically focused on Indian Ocean skipjack and aims at improving the management framework of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. However, our conclusions are applicable to fisheries management worldwide.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.