Words or appearance? The impact of verbal behaviour and facial attraction on first impression

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Shan Gao , Qian Li , Chen He , Xiaojie Yan , Yihao Yin
{"title":"Words or appearance? The impact of verbal behaviour and facial attraction on first impression","authors":"Shan Gao ,&nbsp;Qian Li ,&nbsp;Chen He ,&nbsp;Xiaojie Yan ,&nbsp;Yihao Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In social interactions, verbal and nonverbal information often work together to form an impression of a person. Here, we turn to the interplay between verbal behaviour and facial attractiveness, addressing how these social signals co-act in modulating person judgment and concurrent neural activity. Male and female participants viewed same-sex or opposite-sex faces (attractive and average-looking) randomly paired with verbal evaluations (praise, criticism, and neutral) and rated the likeability of the individuals depicted in the face images. Results showed that, as compared to neutral descriptions, praise increased likeability and criticism diminished it. Attractive individuals were rated more likeable than average-looking ones. This attractiveness advantage was significantly reduced when faces were paired with criticism relative to praise or neutral descriptions, while it was not significantly enhanced by praise relative to neutral descriptions. Electrophysiologically, criticism elicited larger LPC responses than neutral descriptions, assigned to either attractive or average-looking faces. Differently, praise enhanced the LPC only when assigned to attractive faces but not to average-looking faces. Concurrently, the LPC amplitudes were larger following attractive relative to average-looking individuals providing praise but not criticism or neutral descriptions. This praise-specific attraction-dependent LPC response was associated with likeability ratings for praising “beauties”. In addition, the interaction between verbal behaviour and facial attraction varied across participant and face sex. Overall, our findings provide behavioural and neural evidence for different but interactive roles of verbal and nonverbal information in social interactions and shed light on the facilitation of favorable person impressions in everyday life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125001255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In social interactions, verbal and nonverbal information often work together to form an impression of a person. Here, we turn to the interplay between verbal behaviour and facial attractiveness, addressing how these social signals co-act in modulating person judgment and concurrent neural activity. Male and female participants viewed same-sex or opposite-sex faces (attractive and average-looking) randomly paired with verbal evaluations (praise, criticism, and neutral) and rated the likeability of the individuals depicted in the face images. Results showed that, as compared to neutral descriptions, praise increased likeability and criticism diminished it. Attractive individuals were rated more likeable than average-looking ones. This attractiveness advantage was significantly reduced when faces were paired with criticism relative to praise or neutral descriptions, while it was not significantly enhanced by praise relative to neutral descriptions. Electrophysiologically, criticism elicited larger LPC responses than neutral descriptions, assigned to either attractive or average-looking faces. Differently, praise enhanced the LPC only when assigned to attractive faces but not to average-looking faces. Concurrently, the LPC amplitudes were larger following attractive relative to average-looking individuals providing praise but not criticism or neutral descriptions. This praise-specific attraction-dependent LPC response was associated with likeability ratings for praising “beauties”. In addition, the interaction between verbal behaviour and facial attraction varied across participant and face sex. Overall, our findings provide behavioural and neural evidence for different but interactive roles of verbal and nonverbal information in social interactions and shed light on the facilitation of favorable person impressions in everyday life.
言语还是外表?语言行为和面部吸引力对第一印象的影响
在社会交往中,语言和非语言信息经常共同作用,形成对一个人的印象。在这里,我们转向语言行为和面部吸引力之间的相互作用,解决这些社会信号如何共同调节人的判断和并发的神经活动。男性和女性参与者观看了同性或异性的面孔(有吸引力的和长相一般的),并随机配对了口头评价(赞扬、批评和中立),并对面部图像中所描绘的个人的受欢迎程度进行了评分。结果显示,与中性描述相比,赞美增加了受欢迎程度,批评则降低了受欢迎程度。长相漂亮的人比长相平平的人更受欢迎。当脸与批评、赞美或中性描述配对时,这种吸引力优势显著降低,而与中性描述配对时,这种吸引力优势没有显著增强。在电生理学上,批评引起的LPC反应比中性描述引起的LPC反应更大,无论是对漂亮的脸还是长相一般的脸。不同的是,只有当被分配给漂亮的脸时,表扬才会提高LPC,而不是分配给长相一般的脸。同时,相对于长相平平的人来说,长相漂亮的人在给出表扬而不是批评或中性描述时,LPC的振幅更大。这种特定于赞美的吸引力依赖的LPC反应与赞美“美女”的受欢迎程度评级有关。此外,言语行为和面部吸引力之间的相互作用在参与者和面部性别之间有所不同。总的来说,我们的研究结果为言语和非言语信息在社会交往中不同但相互作用的作用提供了行为和神经证据,并阐明了日常生活中良好的人印象的促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信