Delma Fabíola Ferreira da Silva , Vicente José Laamon Pinto Simoes , Diógenes Cecchin Silveira , Rubia Dominschek , Lidiane Fonseca , Carolina Bremm , Anibal de Moraes , Alda Lúcia Gomes Monteiro , Leonardo Silvestri Szymczak , Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho
{"title":"Forage establishment method and sward height of annual ryegrass: Impact on sward structure and grazing behavior of sheep","authors":"Delma Fabíola Ferreira da Silva , Vicente José Laamon Pinto Simoes , Diógenes Cecchin Silveira , Rubia Dominschek , Lidiane Fonseca , Carolina Bremm , Anibal de Moraes , Alda Lúcia Gomes Monteiro , Leonardo Silvestri Szymczak , Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intensification of specialized agricultural systems, marked by continuous soil disturbance and monoculture, raises concerns about environmental sustainability. Conservation practices, such as no-till and integrated crop-livestock systems, may mitigate these impacts by enhancing soil health and optimizing resource use. However, the effects of forage establishment methods on sward structure and grazing behavior remain poorly understood. This study evaluated how different forage establishment methods (no-till vs. conventional tillage) influence sward structure and the short-term intake rate of Suffolk ewes grazing on annual ryegrass (<em>Lolium multiflorum</em> Lam.). A 2 × 4 factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design, with two forage establishment methods and four sward heights (8, 16, 24, and 32 cm). Sward structure was assessed by fractionating herbage samples into morphological components (leaf blade, pseudostem + sheath, and dead material), quantifying biomass of other species, and determining herbage mass and bulk density using a 5 cm stratification method. Grazing behavior was recorded using IGER Behavior Recorders, and short-term intake rate (STIR) was estimated via the double-weighing technique. The no‑till system resulted in lower leaf blade and specific herbage mass at shorter sward heights and induced higher bite rates compared to conventional tillage. Under the conditions of this study, a sward height of 18 cm for annual ryegrass was associated with the highest intake rate, regardless of the forage establishment method. When sward height exceeded 21 cm, bite mass decreased, reinforcing the influence of sward structure on intake efficiency. These findings demonstrate that pasture establishment methods influence sward structure and grazing behavior, but they do not compromise STIR. A sward height of 18 cm provided favorable conditions for greater intake efficiency of annual ryegrass. While this value does not represent a definitive optimum, it serves as a reference for guiding grazing management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 116468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The intensification of specialized agricultural systems, marked by continuous soil disturbance and monoculture, raises concerns about environmental sustainability. Conservation practices, such as no-till and integrated crop-livestock systems, may mitigate these impacts by enhancing soil health and optimizing resource use. However, the effects of forage establishment methods on sward structure and grazing behavior remain poorly understood. This study evaluated how different forage establishment methods (no-till vs. conventional tillage) influence sward structure and the short-term intake rate of Suffolk ewes grazing on annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). A 2 × 4 factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design, with two forage establishment methods and four sward heights (8, 16, 24, and 32 cm). Sward structure was assessed by fractionating herbage samples into morphological components (leaf blade, pseudostem + sheath, and dead material), quantifying biomass of other species, and determining herbage mass and bulk density using a 5 cm stratification method. Grazing behavior was recorded using IGER Behavior Recorders, and short-term intake rate (STIR) was estimated via the double-weighing technique. The no‑till system resulted in lower leaf blade and specific herbage mass at shorter sward heights and induced higher bite rates compared to conventional tillage. Under the conditions of this study, a sward height of 18 cm for annual ryegrass was associated with the highest intake rate, regardless of the forage establishment method. When sward height exceeded 21 cm, bite mass decreased, reinforcing the influence of sward structure on intake efficiency. These findings demonstrate that pasture establishment methods influence sward structure and grazing behavior, but they do not compromise STIR. A sward height of 18 cm provided favorable conditions for greater intake efficiency of annual ryegrass. While this value does not represent a definitive optimum, it serves as a reference for guiding grazing management.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.