Quantitative assessment of fault reactivation risk based on pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic effects: Application to the Luzhou shale gas field, Sichuan, China

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xuhang Yang , Wei Tao , Renqi Lu , Dahu Li , Weikang Zhang
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of fault reactivation risk based on pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic effects: Application to the Luzhou shale gas field, Sichuan, China","authors":"Xuhang Yang ,&nbsp;Wei Tao ,&nbsp;Renqi Lu ,&nbsp;Dahu Li ,&nbsp;Weikang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitative fault reactivation risk assessment is essential for managing induced seismicity and ensuring safe subsurface energy development. Although both pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic effects govern stress evolution during fluid injection and extraction, most existing risk assessment methods consider only pore pressure changes, thereby limiting predictive accuracy. In this study, we propose a novel Pore pressure Diffusion - Poroelastic Effects Fault Reactivation (PDPE-FR) method that couples pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic stress responses, incorporates both in-situ stress field and injection-induced stress perturbations, and accounts for parameter uncertainties related to fault orientation and stress conditions. We apply this method to the Luzhou shale gas field in China by: (1) collecting and interpolating in-situ stress measurements; (2) constructing fully coupled poroelastic finite element models to simulate injection-induced stress perturbations; and (3) integrating Coulomb stress change and normalized fault slip tendency with parameter uncertainty to evaluate fault reactivation probabilities. The results indicate high reactivation probabilities (50–80 %) for NNE-striking faults in the Fuji Syncline in Luzhou shale gas field under far-field injection, and elevated probabilities (50–90 %) for faults of all orientations under near-field conditions. Strong spatiotemporal correlations between predicted fault reactivation risks and observed seismicity, along with fracturing timelines, validate the robustness of the proposed method. In addition to assessing fault reactivation risk, the method also demonstrates broad applicability in optimizing injection-production strategies and guiding well placement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"913 ","pages":"Article 230876"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195125002628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative fault reactivation risk assessment is essential for managing induced seismicity and ensuring safe subsurface energy development. Although both pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic effects govern stress evolution during fluid injection and extraction, most existing risk assessment methods consider only pore pressure changes, thereby limiting predictive accuracy. In this study, we propose a novel Pore pressure Diffusion - Poroelastic Effects Fault Reactivation (PDPE-FR) method that couples pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic stress responses, incorporates both in-situ stress field and injection-induced stress perturbations, and accounts for parameter uncertainties related to fault orientation and stress conditions. We apply this method to the Luzhou shale gas field in China by: (1) collecting and interpolating in-situ stress measurements; (2) constructing fully coupled poroelastic finite element models to simulate injection-induced stress perturbations; and (3) integrating Coulomb stress change and normalized fault slip tendency with parameter uncertainty to evaluate fault reactivation probabilities. The results indicate high reactivation probabilities (50–80 %) for NNE-striking faults in the Fuji Syncline in Luzhou shale gas field under far-field injection, and elevated probabilities (50–90 %) for faults of all orientations under near-field conditions. Strong spatiotemporal correlations between predicted fault reactivation risks and observed seismicity, along with fracturing timelines, validate the robustness of the proposed method. In addition to assessing fault reactivation risk, the method also demonstrates broad applicability in optimizing injection-production strategies and guiding well placement.
基于孔隙压力扩散和孔隙弹性效应的断层再激活风险定量评价——以四川泸州页岩气田为例
定量的断层再激活风险评估对于管理诱发地震活动和确保安全的地下能源开发至关重要。虽然孔隙压力扩散和孔隙弹性效应共同控制着流体注入和提取过程中的应力演化,但大多数现有的风险评估方法只考虑孔隙压力变化,从而限制了预测的准确性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的孔隙压力扩散-孔隙弹性效应断层再激活(PDPE-FR)方法,该方法将孔隙压力扩散和孔隙弹性应力响应耦合在一起,考虑了地应力场和注入引起的应力扰动,并考虑了与断层方向和应力条件相关的参数不确定性。将该方法应用于中国泸州页岩气田,方法如下:(1)收集并插值地应力测量值;(2)建立全耦合孔隙弹性有限元模型,模拟注入引起的应力扰动;(3)将库仑应力变化和归一化断层滑移趋势与参数不确定性相结合,评估断层再激活概率。结果表明,泸州页岩气田富士向斜北北东向断裂在远场注入条件下活化概率高(50 ~ 80%),近场注入条件下各向异性断裂活化概率高(50 ~ 90%)。预测断层再激活风险与观测到的地震活动性以及压裂时间线之间的强时空相关性验证了所提出方法的鲁棒性。除了评估断层再激活风险外,该方法还在优化注采策略和指导井位方面具有广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tectonophysics
Tectonophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信