User requirements prioritisation for research data management services (RDMS) in Myanmar university libraries: Multi-stakeholder perspectives using the KANO model

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Aint Thin Zar Kyaw , Lihong Zhou
{"title":"User requirements prioritisation for research data management services (RDMS) in Myanmar university libraries: Multi-stakeholder perspectives using the KANO model","authors":"Aint Thin Zar Kyaw ,&nbsp;Lihong Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the prioritisation of RDMS requirements from multi-stakeholder perspectives in Myanmar university libraries, employing the KANO model across four themes: RDM planning, research data collection, research data processing and analysis, and research data preservation and sharing. Data was collected from multi-stakeholders who are in four major university libraries in Myanmar, which are geographically distributed and research incentive nature. The findings reveal that all requirements vary in different priority level from multi-stakeholder perspectives. Six requirements were classified as “one-dimensional (O),” one as “attractive (A),” and the remaining as “indifferent (I).” Top priority requirements include specific and explicit RDM guidelines, access to open data resources, user-friendly access, information retrieval systems training, access to data analysis applications and secure research data storage methods. The study provides a framework for prioritising RDMS requirements based on multi-stakeholder perspectives, offering valuable insights for Myanmar university libraries and other developing areas initiating RDMS implementation. The results also have a global impact, informing the development of research support services and strategies for resource allocation within RDMS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325001181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the prioritisation of RDMS requirements from multi-stakeholder perspectives in Myanmar university libraries, employing the KANO model across four themes: RDM planning, research data collection, research data processing and analysis, and research data preservation and sharing. Data was collected from multi-stakeholders who are in four major university libraries in Myanmar, which are geographically distributed and research incentive nature. The findings reveal that all requirements vary in different priority level from multi-stakeholder perspectives. Six requirements were classified as “one-dimensional (O),” one as “attractive (A),” and the remaining as “indifferent (I).” Top priority requirements include specific and explicit RDM guidelines, access to open data resources, user-friendly access, information retrieval systems training, access to data analysis applications and secure research data storage methods. The study provides a framework for prioritising RDMS requirements based on multi-stakeholder perspectives, offering valuable insights for Myanmar university libraries and other developing areas initiating RDMS implementation. The results also have a global impact, informing the development of research support services and strategies for resource allocation within RDMS.
缅甸大学图书馆研究数据管理服务(RDMS)的用户需求优先级:使用KANO模型的多利益相关者视角
本研究从多方利益相关者的角度调查了缅甸大学图书馆RDM需求的优先顺序,采用了KANO模型,涉及四个主题:RDM规划、研究数据收集、研究数据处理和分析以及研究数据保存和共享。数据收集自缅甸四所主要大学图书馆的多方利益相关者,这些图书馆地理分布和研究激励性质。研究结果表明,从多利益相关者的角度来看,所有需求的优先级不同。六个需求被分类为“一维(O)”,一个被分类为“有吸引力(A)”,其余的被分类为“无关紧要(I)”。最优先的需求包括具体和明确的RDM指南、开放数据资源的访问、用户友好访问、信息检索系统培训、数据分析应用程序的访问和安全的研究数据存储方法。该研究提供了一个基于多方利益相关者视角的RDMS需求优先排序框架,为缅甸大学图书馆和其他启动RDMS实施的发展中地区提供了有价值的见解。研究结果还具有全球影响,为研究支持服务和RDMS内资源分配战略的发展提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信