Persistence through reform: Training graduate students in Chinese Academy of Sciences (1950s–1980s)

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Lin Sichun, Wang Anyi
{"title":"Persistence through reform: Training graduate students in Chinese Academy of Sciences (1950s–1980s)","authors":"Lin Sichun,&nbsp;Wang Anyi","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.101016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chinese graduate education is unique in that national scientific research institutions have autonomous degree-granting and training authority, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) playing a leading role. As the cornerstone of China’s national science and technology system, the CAS has been both the pioneering and driving force behind the system’s graduate programs. This study explores how the CAS has shaped this educational model. In the 1950 s, facing a lack of research-focused roles in universities and misaligned training objectives, the CAS adopted a model resembling the Soviet Academy of Sciences, integrating graduate training into collaborative research. Yet this approach created tensions between research priorities and educational goals. By the 1980s, the growing research capabilities of universities further challenged the CAS’s position. To reconcile these internal and external conflicts—and to cultivate high-level scientific talent aligned with national strategic needs—the CAS drew lessons from the American graduate school system. Through external collaboration and internal integration, it reformed its training model to better serve national objectives. Drawing on extensive archival and historical research, this paper traces the evolution of the CAS’s graduate training model and its enduring role in both graduate education and national research. It analyzes how the autonomous training model of China’s national research institutions emerged and persisted, as well as how the CAS’s reforms have influenced the trajectory of graduate education in China. Ultimately, it offers fresh perspectives on the distinctive features of Chinese graduate education and the contributions of national research institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51032,"journal":{"name":"Endeavour","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 101016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endeavour","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932725000390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese graduate education is unique in that national scientific research institutions have autonomous degree-granting and training authority, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) playing a leading role. As the cornerstone of China’s national science and technology system, the CAS has been both the pioneering and driving force behind the system’s graduate programs. This study explores how the CAS has shaped this educational model. In the 1950 s, facing a lack of research-focused roles in universities and misaligned training objectives, the CAS adopted a model resembling the Soviet Academy of Sciences, integrating graduate training into collaborative research. Yet this approach created tensions between research priorities and educational goals. By the 1980s, the growing research capabilities of universities further challenged the CAS’s position. To reconcile these internal and external conflicts—and to cultivate high-level scientific talent aligned with national strategic needs—the CAS drew lessons from the American graduate school system. Through external collaboration and internal integration, it reformed its training model to better serve national objectives. Drawing on extensive archival and historical research, this paper traces the evolution of the CAS’s graduate training model and its enduring role in both graduate education and national research. It analyzes how the autonomous training model of China’s national research institutions emerged and persisted, as well as how the CAS’s reforms have influenced the trajectory of graduate education in China. Ultimately, it offers fresh perspectives on the distinctive features of Chinese graduate education and the contributions of national research institutions.
改革中坚持:中国科学院研究生培养(1950 - 80年代)
中国研究生教育的独特之处在于,在中国科学院的领导下,国家科研机构拥有自主的学位授予和培养权。作为中国国家科技体系的基石,中国科学院一直是该系统研究生项目的先驱和推动者。本研究探讨了中国科学院如何塑造这种教育模式。在20世纪50年代,面对大学缺乏以研究为中心的角色和不一致的培养目标,中国科学院采用了类似苏联科学院的模式,将研究生培养融入合作研究。然而,这种方法在研究重点和教育目标之间造成了紧张关系。到了20世纪80年代,大学研究能力的增强进一步挑战了中国科学院的地位。为了调和这些内外矛盾,培养符合国家战略需要的高层次科学人才,中科院借鉴了美国的研究生院制度。通过外部协作和内部整合,改革了培训模式,更好地服务于国家目标。本文利用大量的档案和历史研究,追溯了中国科学院研究生培养模式的演变及其在研究生教育和国家研究中的持久作用。分析了中国国家科研机构自主培养模式的形成和延续,以及中国科学院的改革如何影响中国研究生教育的发展轨迹。最后,它为中国研究生教育的独特特征和国家研究机构的贡献提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endeavour
Endeavour 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Endeavour, established in 1942, has, over its long and proud history, developed into one of the leading journals in the history and philosophy of science. Endeavour publishes high-quality articles on a wide array of scientific topics from ancient to modern, across all disciplines. It serves as a critical forum for the interdisciplinary exploration and evaluation of natural knowledge and its development throughout history. Each issue contains lavish color and black-and-white illustrations. This makes Endeavour an ideal destination for history and philosophy of science articles with a strong visual component. Endeavour presents the history and philosophy of science in a clear and accessible manner, ensuring the journal is a valuable tool for historians, philosophers, practicing scientists, and general readers. To enable it to have the broadest coverage possible, Endeavour features four types of articles: -Research articles are concise, fully referenced, and beautifully illustrated with high quality reproductions of the most important source material. -In Vivo articles will illustrate the rich and numerous connections between historical and philosophical scholarship and matters of current public interest, and provide rich, readable explanations of important current events from historical and philosophical perspectives. -Book Reviews and Commentaries provide a picture of the rapidly growing history of science discipline. Written by both established and emerging scholars, our reviews provide a vibrant overview of the latest publications and media in the history and philosophy of science. -Lost and Found Pieces are playful and creative short essays which focus on objects, theories, tools, and methods that have been significant to science but underappreciated by collective memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信