Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: long-term utilization and outcomes among black men.

Zhiyu Qian,Stephan Korn,Hanna Zurl,Daniel Stelzl,Filippo Dagnino,Mansoo Cho,Danesha Daniels,Stuart Lipsitz,Hari S Iyer,Alexander P Cole,Quoc-Dien Trinh
{"title":"Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: long-term utilization and outcomes among black men.","authors":"Zhiyu Qian,Stephan Korn,Hanna Zurl,Daniel Stelzl,Filippo Dagnino,Mansoo Cho,Danesha Daniels,Stuart Lipsitz,Hari S Iyer,Alexander P Cole,Quoc-Dien Trinh","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns persist that low-risk prostate cancer in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men may be more aggressive, with clinicians uncertain if active-surveillance (AS) should be used in this population. Using the SEER Prostate Cancer Specialized Database (2010-2020), we analyzed 106,486 men with low-risk prostate cancer, of whom 16.6% were NHB. AS or watchful waiting (AS/WW) was less frequently used in NHB men compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) men (32.9% vs 37.5%), NHB men showed consistently lower utilization of AS/WW over the years (aOR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86, 0.95), with absolute differences ranging from 3.4% to 8.5%. In multivariable competing risks analysis, 10-year PCSM did not significantly differ by race (SHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.66-1.60). These findings suggest AS/WW is a safe option for NHB men and its use may be underutilized in this group despite comparable long-term cancer-specific outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns persist that low-risk prostate cancer in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men may be more aggressive, with clinicians uncertain if active-surveillance (AS) should be used in this population. Using the SEER Prostate Cancer Specialized Database (2010-2020), we analyzed 106,486 men with low-risk prostate cancer, of whom 16.6% were NHB. AS or watchful waiting (AS/WW) was less frequently used in NHB men compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) men (32.9% vs 37.5%), NHB men showed consistently lower utilization of AS/WW over the years (aOR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86, 0.95), with absolute differences ranging from 3.4% to 8.5%. In multivariable competing risks analysis, 10-year PCSM did not significantly differ by race (SHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.66-1.60). These findings suggest AS/WW is a safe option for NHB men and its use may be underutilized in this group despite comparable long-term cancer-specific outcomes.
低风险前列腺癌的主动监测:黑人男性的长期使用和结果。
人们一直担心,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)男性的低风险前列腺癌可能更具侵袭性,临床医生不确定是否应该在这一人群中使用主动监测(AS)。使用SEER前列腺癌专业数据库(2010-2020),我们分析了106,486名低风险前列腺癌男性,其中16.6%为NHB。与非西班牙裔白人(NHW)男性相比,NHB男性使用AS或观察等待(AS/WW)的频率较低(32.9% vs 37.5%),多年来,NHB男性使用AS/WW的频率一直较低(aOR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86, 0.95),绝对差异范围为3.4%至8.5%。在多变量竞争风险分析中,不同种族的10年PCSM无显著差异(SHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.66-1.60)。这些研究结果表明,AS/WW对NHB男性来说是一种安全的选择,尽管长期的癌症特异性结果相当,但在这一组中,AS/WW的使用可能未得到充分利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信