Martin Reck,Nikolaj Frost,Solange Peters,Bernard A Fox,Roberto Ferrara,Rajkumar Savai,Fabrice Barlesi
{"title":"Treatment of NSCLC after chemoimmunotherapy - are we making headway?","authors":"Martin Reck,Nikolaj Frost,Solange Peters,Bernard A Fox,Roberto Ferrara,Rajkumar Savai,Fabrice Barlesi","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01061-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved considerably with the integration of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into first-line regimens. However, the majority of patients will ultimately have primary resistance or develop secondary resistance, driven by a complex interplay of intrinsic tumour biology and adaptive changes within the tumour microenvironment (TME), which can be further amplified by host-related factors such as dysbiosis and organ-specific conditions. Despite these heterogeneous origins, most mechanisms of resistance to ICIs lead to an immunosuppressive TME as the final common pathway. Consequently, current strategies designed to overcome resistance aim to restore antitumour immunity via antibody-based therapies (including bispecific antibodies, T cell engagers and antibody-drug conjugates), targeted therapies, adoptive cell therapies, therapeutic vaccines or intratumoural immunotherapies. Although substantial progress has been made in identifying potential biomarkers associated with immune resistance, the clinical relevance of many of these observations remains limited. Biomarker-driven studies using adaptive, hypothesis-generating designs might offer a promising path forward by navigating the complexity of resistance and enabling the timely evaluation of novel therapeutic concepts. In this Review, we summarize the latest advances in addressing resistance to ICIs in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC and provide insights into emerging clinical strategies and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01061-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved considerably with the integration of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into first-line regimens. However, the majority of patients will ultimately have primary resistance or develop secondary resistance, driven by a complex interplay of intrinsic tumour biology and adaptive changes within the tumour microenvironment (TME), which can be further amplified by host-related factors such as dysbiosis and organ-specific conditions. Despite these heterogeneous origins, most mechanisms of resistance to ICIs lead to an immunosuppressive TME as the final common pathway. Consequently, current strategies designed to overcome resistance aim to restore antitumour immunity via antibody-based therapies (including bispecific antibodies, T cell engagers and antibody-drug conjugates), targeted therapies, adoptive cell therapies, therapeutic vaccines or intratumoural immunotherapies. Although substantial progress has been made in identifying potential biomarkers associated with immune resistance, the clinical relevance of many of these observations remains limited. Biomarker-driven studies using adaptive, hypothesis-generating designs might offer a promising path forward by navigating the complexity of resistance and enabling the timely evaluation of novel therapeutic concepts. In this Review, we summarize the latest advances in addressing resistance to ICIs in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC and provide insights into emerging clinical strategies and future research directions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.