Treatment Choices and Healthcare Services Utilization Amongst Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Patients: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBM integrative and complimentary medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.21926/obm.icm.2503035
Ryan S Wexler, Natasha Parman, Devon J Fox, Danielle ZuZero, Anand Parikshak, Sophia Kwin, Austin R Thompson, Hans L Carlson, Thomas Kern, Scott D Mist, Ryan Bradley, Heather Zwickey, Courtney K Pickworth
{"title":"Treatment Choices and Healthcare Services Utilization Amongst Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Patients: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ryan S Wexler, Natasha Parman, Devon J Fox, Danielle ZuZero, Anand Parikshak, Sophia Kwin, Austin R Thompson, Hans L Carlson, Thomas Kern, Scott D Mist, Ryan Bradley, Heather Zwickey, Courtney K Pickworth","doi":"10.21926/obm.icm.2503035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is a common sequelae of low back pain, the world's leading cause of years lived with disability. LRP typically causes numbness, weakness, and tingling into the lower extremity and is associated with high rates of pain and impaired function. Despite its prevalence, there is significant heterogeneity among clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of LRP, which may contribute to poor patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to identify treatments that participants had previously attempted before enrolling in a randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness-based intervention. This analysis evaluated prior pharmaceutical use, procedures, and non-pharmacologic treatments, with a special focus on complementary and integrative health (CIH) utilization. The data for the present analysis were taken from the health history form of the baseline visit for the randomized controlled trial by Wexler et al 2024. Treatment utilization was evaluated and reported using descriptive characteristics. In this sample of chronic LRP patients (<i>n</i> = 71), we found a high proportion of CIH utilization, including acupuncture (58%), chiropractic care (58%), and herbs/supplements (42%). Most patients (52%) were utilizing two or more CIH modalities to manage their pain. A high percentage of participants had also previously used non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (61%) to manage their pain, and over a third of participants had previously undergone an epidural steroid injection (34%). In our trial, CIH utilization was much higher for treatments like chiropractic care, acupuncture, natural products, and physical activity than has been reported in previous large datasets of patients with chronic pain such as the National Health Interview Survey. Collecting data on CIH utilization in clinical trials can enable researchers to compare their samples to large national datasets and identify differences in use among specific populations. In addition, healthcare utilization data collected in clinical trials can further inform the development of clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":74333,"journal":{"name":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12346153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2503035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is a common sequelae of low back pain, the world's leading cause of years lived with disability. LRP typically causes numbness, weakness, and tingling into the lower extremity and is associated with high rates of pain and impaired function. Despite its prevalence, there is significant heterogeneity among clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of LRP, which may contribute to poor patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to identify treatments that participants had previously attempted before enrolling in a randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness-based intervention. This analysis evaluated prior pharmaceutical use, procedures, and non-pharmacologic treatments, with a special focus on complementary and integrative health (CIH) utilization. The data for the present analysis were taken from the health history form of the baseline visit for the randomized controlled trial by Wexler et al 2024. Treatment utilization was evaluated and reported using descriptive characteristics. In this sample of chronic LRP patients (n = 71), we found a high proportion of CIH utilization, including acupuncture (58%), chiropractic care (58%), and herbs/supplements (42%). Most patients (52%) were utilizing two or more CIH modalities to manage their pain. A high percentage of participants had also previously used non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (61%) to manage their pain, and over a third of participants had previously undergone an epidural steroid injection (34%). In our trial, CIH utilization was much higher for treatments like chiropractic care, acupuncture, natural products, and physical activity than has been reported in previous large datasets of patients with chronic pain such as the National Health Interview Survey. Collecting data on CIH utilization in clinical trials can enable researchers to compare their samples to large national datasets and identify differences in use among specific populations. In addition, healthcare utilization data collected in clinical trials can further inform the development of clinical practice guidelines.

腰骶神经根病患者的治疗选择和医疗服务利用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
腰骶神经根性疼痛(LRP)是腰痛的常见后遗症,腰痛是世界上导致残疾的主要原因。LRP通常会导致下肢麻木、无力和刺痛,并伴有高疼痛率和功能受损。尽管LRP很流行,但在LRP治疗的临床实践指南中存在显著的异质性,这可能导致患者预后不佳。本研究的目的是确定参与者在参加基于正念的干预的随机对照试验之前曾尝试过的治疗方法。该分析评估了先前的药物使用,程序和非药物治疗,特别关注补充和综合健康(CIH)的利用。本分析的数据来自Wexler等人2024年随机对照试验基线访视时的健康史表。使用描述性特征评估和报告治疗利用情况。在这个慢性LRP患者样本(n = 71)中,我们发现CIH使用率很高,包括针灸(58%),脊椎指压治疗(58%)和草药/补品(42%)。大多数患者(52%)使用两种或更多种CIH方式来控制疼痛。很高比例的参与者以前也使用过非甾体类抗炎药(61%)来控制疼痛,超过三分之一的参与者以前接受过硬膜外类固醇注射(34%)。在我们的试验中,与之前的大型慢性疼痛患者数据集(如全国健康访谈调查)相比,CIH在脊椎指压治疗、针灸、天然产品和体育活动等治疗中的使用率要高得多。收集临床试验中CIH使用的数据可以使研究人员将其样本与大型国家数据集进行比较,并确定特定人群中使用的差异。此外,在临床试验中收集的医疗保健利用数据可以进一步为临床实践指南的制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信