Title: race and ethnicity and the risk of community-acquired third-generation cephalosporin-resistant uropathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sweta Balaji, Sarah Blackmon, Esther E Avendano, Samson Alemu Argaw, Rebecca A Morin, Nanguneri Nirmala, Shira Doron, Maya L Nadimpalli
{"title":"Title: race and ethnicity and the risk of community-acquired third-generation cephalosporin-resistant uropathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sweta Balaji, Sarah Blackmon, Esther E Avendano, Samson Alemu Argaw, Rebecca A Morin, Nanguneri Nirmala, Shira Doron, Maya L Nadimpalli","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was to synthesize literature on the differences in risk of community-acquired third-generation cephalosporin resistant (3GC-R) uropathogens across racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This SRMA builds on a completed scoping review of the association between race, ethnicity, and risk of colonization or community-acquired infection with ESKAPE pathogens. A literature search was conducted for the earlier scoping review in January 2022 and updated in March 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, titles and abstracts were screened before advancing to full-text review and data extraction. A customized extraction form in Covidence captured relevant information from each study. For this SRMA, studies identified in the scoping review that reported case counts or effect measures related to colonization or community-acquired infection with 3GC-R uropathogens across distinct identities were included. Separate random effects meta-analyses assessed differences in risk of 3GC-R uropathogens between each minority racial/ethnic group and White/Caucasian persons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies comprising 13,527 subjects were included in the SRMA, among which there was generally a higher risk of 3GC-R uropathogens among Hispanic/Latinx and Asian persons compared to White persons. Only the meta-analysis of Hispanic/Latinx versus White/Caucasian persons yielded a statistically significant pooled risk ratio; specifically, Hispanic/Latinx persons had a 27% higher risk of harboring 3GC-R uropathogens (95% CI: 1.04, 1.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As antibiotic resistance rises in community settings, our findings support the need to understand the structural issues that underpin differential risk of 3GC-R uropathogens across race and ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was to synthesize literature on the differences in risk of community-acquired third-generation cephalosporin resistant (3GC-R) uropathogens across racial and ethnic groups.

Methods: This SRMA builds on a completed scoping review of the association between race, ethnicity, and risk of colonization or community-acquired infection with ESKAPE pathogens. A literature search was conducted for the earlier scoping review in January 2022 and updated in March 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, titles and abstracts were screened before advancing to full-text review and data extraction. A customized extraction form in Covidence captured relevant information from each study. For this SRMA, studies identified in the scoping review that reported case counts or effect measures related to colonization or community-acquired infection with 3GC-R uropathogens across distinct identities were included. Separate random effects meta-analyses assessed differences in risk of 3GC-R uropathogens between each minority racial/ethnic group and White/Caucasian persons.

Results: Five studies comprising 13,527 subjects were included in the SRMA, among which there was generally a higher risk of 3GC-R uropathogens among Hispanic/Latinx and Asian persons compared to White persons. Only the meta-analysis of Hispanic/Latinx versus White/Caucasian persons yielded a statistically significant pooled risk ratio; specifically, Hispanic/Latinx persons had a 27% higher risk of harboring 3GC-R uropathogens (95% CI: 1.04, 1.55).

Conclusions: As antibiotic resistance rises in community settings, our findings support the need to understand the structural issues that underpin differential risk of 3GC-R uropathogens across race and ethnicity.

题目:种族和民族与社区获得性第三代头孢菌素耐药尿路病原体的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析(SRMA)的目的是综合不同种族和民族的社区获得性第三代头孢菌素耐药(3GC-R)尿路病原体风险差异的文献。方法:本SRMA建立在种族、民族和ESKAPE病原体定植或社区获得性感染风险之间的完整范围审查的基础上。在2022年1月对早期的范围评估进行了文献检索,并于2024年3月进行了更新。按照PRISMA的指导方针,在进行全文审查和数据提取之前,对标题和摘要进行筛选。在《covid》中定制的提取表格捕获了每项研究的相关信息。在本次SRMA中,纳入了范围综述中发现的与不同身份的3GC-R尿路病原体定植或社区获得性感染相关的病例数或效果测量的研究。单独的随机效应荟萃分析评估了各少数种族/民族与白人/高加索人之间3GC-R尿路病原体风险的差异。结果:SRMA纳入了5项研究,共13527名受试者,其中西班牙裔/拉丁裔和亚洲人的3GC-R尿路病原体风险普遍高于白人。只有西班牙裔/拉丁裔与白人/高加索人的荟萃分析产生了统计学上显著的综合风险比;具体来说,西班牙裔/拉丁裔人携带3GC-R尿路病原体的风险高出27% (95% CI: 1.04, 1.55)。结论:随着抗生素耐药性在社区环境中的上升,我们的研究结果支持有必要了解导致不同种族和民族的3GC-R尿路病原体风险差异的结构性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信