Feasibility and utility of the days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) in national antimicrobial use surveillance in Japan.

Ichiro Kawamura, Sanae Suzuki, Mio Endo, Masaaki Ogawa, Satoshi Hasegawa
{"title":"Feasibility and utility of the days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) in national antimicrobial use surveillance in Japan.","authors":"Ichiro Kawamura, Sanae Suzuki, Mio Endo, Masaaki Ogawa, Satoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) is a novel metric that incorporates the antibiotic spectrum into consumption metrics, addressing the limitations of traditional metrics such as days of therapy (DOT). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of integrating DASC into the Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology (J-SIPHE) system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals voluntarily participating in J-SIPHE.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Inpatients from 1,833 hospitals between January 2019 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antibiotic use was assessed using DOT, DASC, and DASC/DOT. Antibiotic spectrum coverage scores were assigned based on published data or expert consensus. Annual trends were assessed using median values, and hospital-level variation was explored by hospital size. Proportional use of antibiotic classes by DOT and DASC was compared using 2022 data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the number of hospitals participating in J-SIPHE increased over time-particularly small and medium-sized hospitals-median DOT and DASC per 1,000 patient-days declined by 21.2% and 19.1%, respectively, from 2019 to 2022, while DASC/DOT remained stable. In 2022, proportional use of antibiotic classes varied by hospital size, and rankings differed when comparing DOT- and DASC-based measures. Broad-spectrum agents such as carbapenems and fluoroquinolones ranked higher by DASC than DOT. Hospital-level distributions of DOT and DASC/DOT showed substantial variation across hospital sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration of DASC metrics into national surveillance is feasible. DASC and DASC/DOT complement DOT by incorporating spectrum breadth, providing more comprehensive insight into antimicrobial use patterns and supporting stewardship benchmarking and intervention planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) is a novel metric that incorporates the antibiotic spectrum into consumption metrics, addressing the limitations of traditional metrics such as days of therapy (DOT). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of integrating DASC into the Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology (J-SIPHE) system.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Hospitals voluntarily participating in J-SIPHE.

Participants: Inpatients from 1,833 hospitals between January 2019 and December 2022.

Methods: Antibiotic use was assessed using DOT, DASC, and DASC/DOT. Antibiotic spectrum coverage scores were assigned based on published data or expert consensus. Annual trends were assessed using median values, and hospital-level variation was explored by hospital size. Proportional use of antibiotic classes by DOT and DASC was compared using 2022 data.

Results: As the number of hospitals participating in J-SIPHE increased over time-particularly small and medium-sized hospitals-median DOT and DASC per 1,000 patient-days declined by 21.2% and 19.1%, respectively, from 2019 to 2022, while DASC/DOT remained stable. In 2022, proportional use of antibiotic classes varied by hospital size, and rankings differed when comparing DOT- and DASC-based measures. Broad-spectrum agents such as carbapenems and fluoroquinolones ranked higher by DASC than DOT. Hospital-level distributions of DOT and DASC/DOT showed substantial variation across hospital sizes.

Conclusions: Integration of DASC metrics into national surveillance is feasible. DASC and DASC/DOT complement DOT by incorporating spectrum breadth, providing more comprehensive insight into antimicrobial use patterns and supporting stewardship benchmarking and intervention planning.

日本全国抗菌药物使用监测中抗生素谱覆盖天数的可行性和实用性。
目的:抗生素谱覆盖天数(DASC)是一种将抗生素谱纳入消费指标的新指标,解决了传统指标如治疗天数(DOT)的局限性。本研究旨在探讨将DASC纳入日本感染预防与卫生保健流行病学监测(J-SIPHE)系统的可行性。设计:回顾性观察性研究。实验环境:自愿参与J-SIPHE的医院。参与者:2019年1月至2022年12月期间来自1833家医院的住院患者。方法:采用DOT法、DASC法和DASC/DOT法评估抗生素使用情况。抗生素谱覆盖评分是根据公布的数据或专家共识来分配的。使用中位数评估年度趋势,并通过医院规模探讨医院水平的变化。使用2022年的数据比较DOT和DASC的抗生素类别比例使用情况。结果:随着参与J-SIPHE的医院数量的增加,特别是中小型医院,从2019年到2022年,每1000患者日的DOT和DASC中位数分别下降了21.2%和19.1%,而DASC/DOT保持稳定。2022年,抗生素类别的比例使用因医院规模而异,在比较基于DOT和dass的措施时排名不同。碳青霉烯类、氟喹诺酮类等广谱药物的DASC高于DOT。医院层面DOT和DASC/DOT的分布在不同医院规模之间存在显著差异。结论:将DASC指标纳入国家监测是可行的。DASC和DASC/DOT通过整合频谱宽度来补充DOT,提供更全面的抗菌药物使用模式洞察,并支持管理基准和干预计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信