Beyond Handrubs: QAC Wipes as a Water-Sparing Alternative for Protein-Contaminated Hand Hygiene with Persistent Dorsum Challenges.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yuhua Yuan, Jin Zhao, Kunkun Leng, Yang Cao, Hui Jin
{"title":"Beyond Handrubs: QAC Wipes as a Water-Sparing Alternative for Protein-Contaminated Hand Hygiene with Persistent Dorsum Challenges.","authors":"Yuhua Yuan, Jin Zhao, Kunkun Leng, Yang Cao, Hui Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness of quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) wipes, handwashing, and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) in removing microorganisms from hands contaminated with proteinaceous organic matter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-controlled crossover trial recruited 15 volunteers who received standardized hand hygiene training. Participants underwent three intervention methods: (1) handwashing with non-antimicrobial soap and running water for 60 seconds; (2) hand rubbing with 70% ethanol + 0.2% hydrogen peroxide for 30 seconds; and (3) hand wiping with QAC wipes for 60 seconds. Both hands were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (1.0-9.0 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL) and supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The microbial reduction was quantified using log<sub>10</sub> CFU/hand for three regions (fingers, palm, and dorsum).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficacy of QAC wipes in bacterial removal from all three hand regions was non-inferior to soap, whereas its performance was significantly superior to that of handrub. Wipes and soap showed lower efficacy on the dorsum compared to the fingers (P < 0.001). The efficacy ranking across hand regions was: fingers > palm > dorsum, and the overall intervention efficacy ranking was: soap = wipes > handrub.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When QAC wipes are used under conditions of organic contamination with a 60-second procedural wiping protocol, the efficacy is not inferior to handwashing with soap, offering a feasible alternative in water-scarce environments. Handrubs show significantly lower efficacy in protein-rich environments. The poor bacterial removal efficiency on the dorsum of the hand highlights an anatomical oversight in hygiene practices, necessitating technical improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared the effectiveness of quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) wipes, handwashing, and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) in removing microorganisms from hands contaminated with proteinaceous organic matter.

Methods: A self-controlled crossover trial recruited 15 volunteers who received standardized hand hygiene training. Participants underwent three intervention methods: (1) handwashing with non-antimicrobial soap and running water for 60 seconds; (2) hand rubbing with 70% ethanol + 0.2% hydrogen peroxide for 30 seconds; and (3) hand wiping with QAC wipes for 60 seconds. Both hands were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (1.0-9.0 × 106 CFU/mL) and supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The microbial reduction was quantified using log10 CFU/hand for three regions (fingers, palm, and dorsum).

Results: The efficacy of QAC wipes in bacterial removal from all three hand regions was non-inferior to soap, whereas its performance was significantly superior to that of handrub. Wipes and soap showed lower efficacy on the dorsum compared to the fingers (P < 0.001). The efficacy ranking across hand regions was: fingers > palm > dorsum, and the overall intervention efficacy ranking was: soap = wipes > handrub.

Conclusion: When QAC wipes are used under conditions of organic contamination with a 60-second procedural wiping protocol, the efficacy is not inferior to handwashing with soap, offering a feasible alternative in water-scarce environments. Handrubs show significantly lower efficacy in protein-rich environments. The poor bacterial removal efficiency on the dorsum of the hand highlights an anatomical oversight in hygiene practices, necessitating technical improvements.

超越擦手:QAC湿巾作为一种节水替代方案,用于蛋白质污染的手部卫生和持续的背部挑战。
背景:本研究比较了季铵化合物(QAC)湿巾、洗手和过氧化氢增强醇基洗手液(abhr)去除被蛋白质性有机物污染的手上微生物的效果。方法:采用自我对照交叉试验,招募15名接受标准化手卫生培训的志愿者。参与者采用三种干预方法:(1)用无抗菌肥皂和自来水洗手60秒;(2)用70%乙醇+ 0.2%双氧水搓手30秒;(3)用QAC湿巾手擦60秒。双手感染金黄色葡萄球菌(1.0-9.0 × 106 CFU/mL),并添加3%牛血清白蛋白(BSA)。使用log10 CFU/手对三个区域(手指、手掌和背部)进行微生物减量量化。结果:QAC湿巾对手部三个区域的细菌去除效果均不低于肥皂,而其性能明显优于洗手液。湿巾和肥皂对背部的疗效低于手指(P < 0.001)。各手区疗效排序为:手指>手掌>背,整体干预疗效排序为:香皂=湿巾>搓手液。结论:QAC湿巾在有机污染条件下,采用60秒程序性擦拭方案使用,其效果不逊于用肥皂洗手,在缺水环境下是一种可行的替代方法。在富含蛋白质的环境中,洗手液的效果明显较低。手背的细菌去除效率差,这突出了卫生实践中解剖学上的疏忽,需要技术改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信