Content analysis of oral hygiene instruction posts on Instagram: a cross-sectional study.

Q3 Dentistry
Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene Pub Date : 2025-06-01
Omar Amjad Al-Karadsheh, Siraj Jawad Zabadi, Dana Radwan Altoum, Najla Sani Kasabreh, Yazan Mansour Hassona
{"title":"Content analysis of oral hygiene instruction posts on Instagram: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Omar Amjad Al-Karadsheh, Siraj Jawad Zabadi, Dana Radwan Altoum, Najla Sani Kasabreh, Yazan Mansour Hassona","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media platforms such as Instagram have emerged as alternative sources for oral hygiene instructions. This cross-sectional study evaluates the usefulness, understandability, and actionability of Instagram oral hygiene instruction posts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Instagram posts was conducted using the hashtags #dentalhygiene and #oralhygiene. The first 100 posts meeting the inclusion criteria for each hashtag were evaluated using 2 tools: the Oral Hygiene Content Usefulness Score (OHCUS), a newly developed scoring system, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The OHCUS assessed the quality and clinical value of posts, while PEMAT evaluated their understandability and actionability. Statistical analysis included the Mann- Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 posts, 110 were videos and 90 were photos. The average number of likes was 2,981.92 (±9,635.64), and the average number of views for videos was 196,583 (±933,509). Seventy-one percent of posts were educational. The mean usefulness score was 2.37 (±1.94), the mean understandability score was 74.4% (±14.87%), and the actionability score averaged 35.6% (±24.37%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Posts from oral health professionals, including dental hygienists, were more useful, understandable, and actionable than posts from other sources, with most posts shared by dental clinic accounts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media, particularly Instagram, has potential as a platform for disseminating oral health education. However, the quality and reliability of the information vary significantly. Posts from oral health professionals, especially dental hygienists, are more beneficial. Enhancing the quality and accuracy of social media content is crucial to maximizing its public health impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":53470,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene","volume":"59 2","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms such as Instagram have emerged as alternative sources for oral hygiene instructions. This cross-sectional study evaluates the usefulness, understandability, and actionability of Instagram oral hygiene instruction posts.

Methods: A systematic search of Instagram posts was conducted using the hashtags #dentalhygiene and #oralhygiene. The first 100 posts meeting the inclusion criteria for each hashtag were evaluated using 2 tools: the Oral Hygiene Content Usefulness Score (OHCUS), a newly developed scoring system, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The OHCUS assessed the quality and clinical value of posts, while PEMAT evaluated their understandability and actionability. Statistical analysis included the Mann- Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation.

Results: Among the 200 posts, 110 were videos and 90 were photos. The average number of likes was 2,981.92 (±9,635.64), and the average number of views for videos was 196,583 (±933,509). Seventy-one percent of posts were educational. The mean usefulness score was 2.37 (±1.94), the mean understandability score was 74.4% (±14.87%), and the actionability score averaged 35.6% (±24.37%).

Discussion: Posts from oral health professionals, including dental hygienists, were more useful, understandable, and actionable than posts from other sources, with most posts shared by dental clinic accounts.

Conclusions: Social media, particularly Instagram, has potential as a platform for disseminating oral health education. However, the quality and reliability of the information vary significantly. Posts from oral health professionals, especially dental hygienists, are more beneficial. Enhancing the quality and accuracy of social media content is crucial to maximizing its public health impact.

Instagram口腔卫生指导帖子内容分析:横断面研究
背景:Instagram等社交媒体平台已经成为口腔卫生指导的替代来源。本横断面研究评估Instagram口腔卫生指导贴的有用性、可理解性和可操作性。方法:使用#牙齿卫生和#口腔卫生标签对Instagram帖子进行系统搜索。使用两种工具对符合每个标签纳入标准的前100个帖子进行评估:口腔卫生内容有用性评分(OHCUS),一种新开发的评分系统,以及患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)。OHCUS评估了员额的质量和临床价值,而PEMAT评估了员额的可理解性和可操作性。统计分析包括Mann- Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman相关检验。结果:200篇微博中,视频110篇,照片90篇。​71%的职位是教育性的。平均有用性得分为2.37(±1.94)分,平均可理解性得分为74.4%(±14.87%)分,平均可操作性得分为35.6%(±24.37%)分。讨论:来自口腔卫生专业人员(包括牙科保健员)的帖子比来自其他来源的帖子更有用、更容易理解、更可操作,大多数帖子都是由牙科诊所账户分享的。结论:社交媒体,特别是Instagram,具有作为传播口腔健康教育平台的潜力。然而,这些信息的质量和可靠性差别很大。来自口腔保健专业人员,特别是牙科保健员的帖子更有益。提高社交媒体内容的质量和准确性对于最大限度地发挥其公共卫生影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene
Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene (CJDH), established in 1966, is the peer-reviewed research journal of the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. Published in February (electronic-only issue), June, and October, CJDH welcomes submissions in English and French on topics of relevance to dental hygiene practice, education, policy, and theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信