Crossing a chasm: Patient partnership and preclinical pain research.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rob Murphy, Richelle Mychasiuk
{"title":"Crossing a chasm: Patient partnership and preclinical pain research.","authors":"Rob Murphy, Richelle Mychasiuk","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the increasing recognition of the value that patient involvement in clinical research adds, patient partners or lived experience consultants remain underutilized in preclinical pain research. This commentary, co-authored with a lived experience consultant, highlights the mutual benefits of integrating patient partners into discovery-based research, including enhanced innovation, improved trust, increased transparency, empowered advocacy, and more effective knowledge translation. Lived experience consultants offer unique insights into symptom burden, treatment outcomes, and model relevance, contributing to more meaningful and translatable research. However, barriers persist, including limited access to patient networks, power imbalances, lack of training for researchers, and insufficient funding for lived experience consultant engagement. Addressing these challenges requires structural support, education, and mandates from funding and regulatory bodies. By fostering collaborative, bi-directional partnerships, preclinical researchers can ensure their work aligns more closely with patient needs and priorities, ultimately improving outcomes and accelerating impact. This commentary proposes actionable strategies for building effective, ethical, and sustainable researcher-patient collaborations for not only chronic pain research, but all discovery-based science. PERSPECTIVE: Involving patient partners in preclinical pain research improves health outcomes by aligning studies with real patient needs. Their insights enhance study design, relevance, and impact, leading to more meaningful outcomes. This collaboration improves quality of life, trust in science, and results in more effective translation of discoveries into real-world solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"105529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105529","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing recognition of the value that patient involvement in clinical research adds, patient partners or lived experience consultants remain underutilized in preclinical pain research. This commentary, co-authored with a lived experience consultant, highlights the mutual benefits of integrating patient partners into discovery-based research, including enhanced innovation, improved trust, increased transparency, empowered advocacy, and more effective knowledge translation. Lived experience consultants offer unique insights into symptom burden, treatment outcomes, and model relevance, contributing to more meaningful and translatable research. However, barriers persist, including limited access to patient networks, power imbalances, lack of training for researchers, and insufficient funding for lived experience consultant engagement. Addressing these challenges requires structural support, education, and mandates from funding and regulatory bodies. By fostering collaborative, bi-directional partnerships, preclinical researchers can ensure their work aligns more closely with patient needs and priorities, ultimately improving outcomes and accelerating impact. This commentary proposes actionable strategies for building effective, ethical, and sustainable researcher-patient collaborations for not only chronic pain research, but all discovery-based science. PERSPECTIVE: Involving patient partners in preclinical pain research improves health outcomes by aligning studies with real patient needs. Their insights enhance study design, relevance, and impact, leading to more meaningful outcomes. This collaboration improves quality of life, trust in science, and results in more effective translation of discoveries into real-world solutions.

跨越鸿沟:患者伙伴关系和临床前疼痛研究。
尽管人们越来越认识到患者参与临床研究的价值,但患者合作伙伴或生活经验顾问在临床前疼痛研究中仍未得到充分利用。这篇评论是与一位生活经验顾问共同撰写的,强调了将患者合作伙伴纳入基于发现的研究的共同利益,包括加强创新、改善信任、提高透明度、加强宣传和更有效的知识翻译。生活经验咨询师对症状负担、治疗结果和模型相关性提供了独特的见解,有助于更有意义和可翻译的研究。然而,障碍仍然存在,包括进入患者网络的机会有限、权力不平衡、缺乏对研究人员的培训以及参与生活体验咨询的资金不足。应对这些挑战需要结构性支持、教育以及资金和监管机构的授权。通过促进双向合作,临床前研究人员可以确保他们的工作更紧密地与患者的需求和优先事项保持一致,最终改善结果并加速影响。这篇评论提出了可操作的策略,以建立有效的、道德的、可持续的研究-患者合作,不仅是慢性疼痛研究,而且是所有基于发现的科学。观点:让患者的伴侣参与临床前疼痛研究,使研究与患者的真实需求相一致,从而改善健康结果。他们的见解增强了研究的设计、相关性和影响,带来了更有意义的结果。这种合作提高了生活质量,提高了人们对科学的信任,并使科学发现更有效地转化为现实世界的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信