Evaluating vestibulo-ocular reflex gain characteristics with monocular video head impulse test across different age groups in a healthy population.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Qin Zhang, Mingwei Xu, Qiong Wu, Yuan Yao, Tianyu Gong, Jianyong Chen, Yulian Jin, Jun Yang, Qing Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating vestibulo-ocular reflex gain characteristics with monocular video head impulse test across different age groups in a healthy population.","authors":"Qin Zhang, Mingwei Xu, Qiong Wu, Yuan Yao, Tianyu Gong, Jianyong Chen, Yulian Jin, Jun Yang, Qing Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09574271251367672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe study aims to assess the high-frequency Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex (VOR) gain across three pairs of semicircular canals using the EyeSeeCam device and to determine normative values.MethodsA total of 105 volunteers, aged 19 to 69 years with no history of vestibular disorders, were enrolled. This cohort included 50 males (mean age 41.11 ± 15.98) and 55 females (mean age 35.52 ± 15.07), with no statistically significant age difference between the genders (<i>P</i> = 0.078). Participants were categorized into six age brackets: 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, and 61-70. For each test, the recording device was consistently positioned on the left side of the goggles, and the tests were conducted by a right-handed operator.ResultsThe average regression gain for left anterior-right posterior canals (LARP) was 1.44 ± 0.19, significantly surpassing that of right anterior-left posterior canals (RALP) at 1.09 ± 0.13 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and horizontal semicircular canals (HSC) at 1.11 ± 0.07 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the VOR gains of RALP and HSC (<i>p</i> = 0.1077). Additionally, VOR gain values did not show significant variation across different age groups. In a gender-based analysis, a marginally higher HSC gain was observed in females (1.13 ± 0.07) compared to males (1.11 ± 0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.042), while no significant gender disparity was noted for RALP gains (females: 1.09 ± 0.11; males: 1.10 ± 0.14; <i>p</i> = 0.641). Females exhibited significantly higher LARP gain values (1.49 ± 0.18) than males (1.41 ± 0.20; <i>p</i> = 0.002).ConclusionThis study underscores the stability of high-frequency VOR gain values across ages. However, it also reveals a significant asymmetry in vertical canal gains (LARP vs RALP), suggesting a possible vertical canals monocular directional preponderance. This finding highlights that normative values can be highly specific to the recording and testing protocol. Thus, laboratories should develop their own normative values, customized to their equipment and testing protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"9574271251367672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251367672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe study aims to assess the high-frequency Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex (VOR) gain across three pairs of semicircular canals using the EyeSeeCam device and to determine normative values.MethodsA total of 105 volunteers, aged 19 to 69 years with no history of vestibular disorders, were enrolled. This cohort included 50 males (mean age 41.11 ± 15.98) and 55 females (mean age 35.52 ± 15.07), with no statistically significant age difference between the genders (P = 0.078). Participants were categorized into six age brackets: 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, and 61-70. For each test, the recording device was consistently positioned on the left side of the goggles, and the tests were conducted by a right-handed operator.ResultsThe average regression gain for left anterior-right posterior canals (LARP) was 1.44 ± 0.19, significantly surpassing that of right anterior-left posterior canals (RALP) at 1.09 ± 0.13 (p < 0.001) and horizontal semicircular canals (HSC) at 1.11 ± 0.07 (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the VOR gains of RALP and HSC (p = 0.1077). Additionally, VOR gain values did not show significant variation across different age groups. In a gender-based analysis, a marginally higher HSC gain was observed in females (1.13 ± 0.07) compared to males (1.11 ± 0.07; p = 0.042), while no significant gender disparity was noted for RALP gains (females: 1.09 ± 0.11; males: 1.10 ± 0.14; p = 0.641). Females exhibited significantly higher LARP gain values (1.49 ± 0.18) than males (1.41 ± 0.20; p = 0.002).ConclusionThis study underscores the stability of high-frequency VOR gain values across ages. However, it also reveals a significant asymmetry in vertical canal gains (LARP vs RALP), suggesting a possible vertical canals monocular directional preponderance. This finding highlights that normative values can be highly specific to the recording and testing protocol. Thus, laboratories should develop their own normative values, customized to their equipment and testing protocols.

用单眼视频头脉冲试验评价健康人群不同年龄组前庭眼反射增益特征。
目的:本研究旨在利用EyeSeeCam设备评估三对半规管的高频前庭-眼反射(VOR)增益,并确定规范值。方法共纳入105名志愿者,年龄19 ~ 69岁,无前庭疾病史。男性50例(平均年龄41.11±15.98),女性55例(平均年龄35.52±15.07),性别年龄差异无统计学意义(P = 0.078)。参与者被分为6个年龄段:11-20岁、21-30岁、31-40岁、41-50岁、51-60岁和61-70岁。对于每次测试,记录设备始终放置在护目镜的左侧,并由右撇子操作员进行测试。结果左前后后管(LARP)的平均回归增益为1.44±0.19,显著高于右前后后管(RALP)的1.09±0.13 (p < 0.001)和水平半规管(HSC)的1.11±0.07 (p < 0.001)。RALP与HSC的VOR增益无显著差异(p = 0.1077)。此外,VOR增益值在不同年龄组之间没有显着变化。在一项基于性别的分析中,女性的HSC增加(1.13±0.07)略高于男性(1.11±0.07);p = 0.042),而RALP增益的性别差异不显著(女性:1.09±0.11;男性:1.10±0.14;P = 0.641)。雌性的LARP增益值(1.49±0.18)显著高于雄性(1.41±0.20);P = 0.002)。结论本研究强调了不同年龄的高频VOR增益值的稳定性。然而,它也揭示了垂直椎管增益的显著不对称性(LARP vs RALP),表明可能存在垂直椎管单眼定向优势。这一发现强调了规范性值可以高度特定于记录和测试协议。因此,实验室应该制定自己的规范值,根据自己的设备和测试方案进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信