Future gaps in the public provision of health services in Austria? A mixed-methods analysis for specialists in internal medicine.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Clemens Zech, Monika Riedel
{"title":"Future gaps in the public provision of health services in Austria? A mixed-methods analysis for specialists in internal medicine.","authors":"Clemens Zech, Monika Riedel","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-01013-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population growth and aging are likely to increase demand for healthcare providers, even in countries with high provider-to-population ratios. To plan appropriate policy measures, detailed information on supply and demand trends in the physician workforce for each medical specialty is essential. This article assesses the current supply of all specialists in internal medicine (general and subspecialties) in Austria and projects future supply and demand until 2035.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our analysis follows a framework for workforce planning consisting of four stages: (1) horizon scanning, (2) scenario generation, (3) workforce modelling, and (4) policy analysis. We use stakeholder workshops, interviews and an online survey (n = 484) in the first two stages. Future supply is modelled using stock-flow models, whereas demand is projected using regression modelling based on existing forecasts and extrapolations of historical care use. Different scenarios are used to account for uncertain developments. The two main settings of care in Austria-public hospitals and publicly financed outpatient care-are modelled separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, no severe shortage of specialists in internal medicine is expected in Austria until 2035. However, our analysis suggests that the two settings of care will experience very different developments: while the gap between supply and demand in public hospitals is expected to be small (± 5 percent), the supply of specialists in publicly financed outpatient care is projected to fall between 10 and 25 percent short of demand.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Without major reforms, capacity constraints will likely affect the publicly financed outpatient sector, hindering the desired shift from inpatient to outpatient care or driving patients into the private outpatient sector where higher user charges apply. Therefore, it is essential for policy makers to incentivize physicians to work in publicly financed outpatient care. Increasing enrolment in medical schools is not a suitable policy measure, as no significant shortage of specialists in internal medicine is expected overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-01013-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population growth and aging are likely to increase demand for healthcare providers, even in countries with high provider-to-population ratios. To plan appropriate policy measures, detailed information on supply and demand trends in the physician workforce for each medical specialty is essential. This article assesses the current supply of all specialists in internal medicine (general and subspecialties) in Austria and projects future supply and demand until 2035.

Methods: Our analysis follows a framework for workforce planning consisting of four stages: (1) horizon scanning, (2) scenario generation, (3) workforce modelling, and (4) policy analysis. We use stakeholder workshops, interviews and an online survey (n = 484) in the first two stages. Future supply is modelled using stock-flow models, whereas demand is projected using regression modelling based on existing forecasts and extrapolations of historical care use. Different scenarios are used to account for uncertain developments. The two main settings of care in Austria-public hospitals and publicly financed outpatient care-are modelled separately.

Results: Overall, no severe shortage of specialists in internal medicine is expected in Austria until 2035. However, our analysis suggests that the two settings of care will experience very different developments: while the gap between supply and demand in public hospitals is expected to be small (± 5 percent), the supply of specialists in publicly financed outpatient care is projected to fall between 10 and 25 percent short of demand.

Conclusions: Without major reforms, capacity constraints will likely affect the publicly financed outpatient sector, hindering the desired shift from inpatient to outpatient care or driving patients into the private outpatient sector where higher user charges apply. Therefore, it is essential for policy makers to incentivize physicians to work in publicly financed outpatient care. Increasing enrolment in medical schools is not a suitable policy measure, as no significant shortage of specialists in internal medicine is expected overall.

奥地利公共卫生服务未来的差距是什么?对内科专家的混合方法分析。
背景:人口增长和老龄化可能会增加对医疗保健提供者的需求,即使在提供者与人口比率较高的国家也是如此。为了规划适当的政策措施,每个医学专业医生劳动力的供需趋势的详细信息是必不可少的。本文评估了奥地利目前所有内科专家(普通和专科)的供应情况,并预测了到2035年的未来供需情况。方法:我们的分析遵循由四个阶段组成的劳动力规划框架:(1)水平扫描,(2)情景生成,(3)劳动力建模,(4)政策分析。我们在前两个阶段使用利益相关者研讨会、访谈和在线调查(n = 484)。未来供应使用库存流量模型建模,而需求使用基于现有预测和历史护理使用推断的回归模型进行预测。不同的情景被用来解释不确定的发展。在奥地利,两种主要的医疗环境——公立医院和公共资助的门诊护理——分别进行了建模。结果:总体而言,预计到2035年奥地利不会出现严重的内科专家短缺。然而,我们的分析表明,这两种护理设置将经历非常不同的发展:虽然公立医院的供需差距预计很小(±5%),但公共资助的门诊护理专家的供应预计将低于需求10%至25%。结论:如果不进行重大改革,能力限制可能会影响公共资助的门诊部门,阻碍从住院到门诊的理想转变,或迫使患者进入收费较高的私营门诊部门。因此,政策制定者必须鼓励医生在公共资助的门诊服务中工作。增加医学院的招生人数并不是一项合适的政策措施,因为预计总体上不会出现内科专家的严重短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信