Nerdjes Ferhaoui, Mohammed Sebaihia, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Makoto Kuroda
{"title":"Shotgun Metagenomic Investigation of the Microbiome in Diabetic Foot Infections Compared to Healthy Skin.","authors":"Nerdjes Ferhaoui, Mohammed Sebaihia, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Makoto Kuroda","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetes, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Host factors and microorganisms in DFI can disrupt healing processes, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds. The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of DFIs and contralateral healthy foot skin (CHFS). Thirty-two diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Samples were obtained from DFIs and CHFS from the same patient. The microbiome was profiled using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. All the samples were polymicrobial, with a predominance of the obligate anaerobes belonging to Bacteroidetes in PEDIS 4. While PEDIS 3 and 2 were dominated by Proteobacteria. CHFS showed similar bacterial composition across all grades of severity, and the most abundant genera detected were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Cutibacterium. The CHFS was more diverse than DFIs in PEDIS 3 and 4. However, DFIs and CHFS in PEDIS 2 present similar diversity. In addition, DFIs of this grade exhibited a high proportion of Corynebacterium as well as CHFS. PCoA analysis demonstrated that the community structure of DFIs was different from that of CHFS, with Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas the main contributors to the clustering. Neighbour-Net analyses revealed that DFIs exhibited lower diversity compared to CHFS and harboured a more homogeneous dominant bacterial community. Our study revealed a high abundance of obligate anaerobes, including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Morganella, and Porphyromonas, in more severe infections; along with a decrease in microbial diversity. Additionally, there was a decrease in the abundance of key bacteria from the normal skin microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetes, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Host factors and microorganisms in DFI can disrupt healing processes, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds. The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of DFIs and contralateral healthy foot skin (CHFS). Thirty-two diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Samples were obtained from DFIs and CHFS from the same patient. The microbiome was profiled using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. All the samples were polymicrobial, with a predominance of the obligate anaerobes belonging to Bacteroidetes in PEDIS 4. While PEDIS 3 and 2 were dominated by Proteobacteria. CHFS showed similar bacterial composition across all grades of severity, and the most abundant genera detected were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Cutibacterium. The CHFS was more diverse than DFIs in PEDIS 3 and 4. However, DFIs and CHFS in PEDIS 2 present similar diversity. In addition, DFIs of this grade exhibited a high proportion of Corynebacterium as well as CHFS. PCoA analysis demonstrated that the community structure of DFIs was different from that of CHFS, with Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas the main contributors to the clustering. Neighbour-Net analyses revealed that DFIs exhibited lower diversity compared to CHFS and harboured a more homogeneous dominant bacterial community. Our study revealed a high abundance of obligate anaerobes, including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Morganella, and Porphyromonas, in more severe infections; along with a decrease in microbial diversity. Additionally, there was a decrease in the abundance of key bacteria from the normal skin microbiota.
期刊介绍:
Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others.
Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.