Improving the Accuracy of Diagnostic Imaging using Artificial Intelligence: A Method for Assessing Necrotic Tissue in Pressure Injury.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yonago acta medica Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.33160/yam.2025.08.014
Yuka Kimura, Kento Ikuta, Makoto Ohga, Ryunosuke Umeda, Makoto Nakagaki, Yoshiko Suyama, Haruka Kanayama, Mamoru Konishi, Hiroyuki Nishikawa, Shunjiro Yagi
{"title":"Improving the Accuracy of Diagnostic Imaging using Artificial Intelligence: A Method for Assessing Necrotic Tissue in Pressure Injury.","authors":"Yuka Kimura, Kento Ikuta, Makoto Ohga, Ryunosuke Umeda, Makoto Nakagaki, Yoshiko Suyama, Haruka Kanayama, Mamoru Konishi, Hiroyuki Nishikawa, Shunjiro Yagi","doi":"10.33160/yam.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate assessment of pressure injuries is critical in clinical settings, especially when evaluating necrotic tissue using the DESIGN-R® scale widely adopted in Japan. This study aimed to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into the evaluation process to enhance diagnostic consistency and accuracy. By leveraging deep learning and convolutional neural networks, we explored the potential of AI models in classifying necrotic tissue from wound images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic medical records and wound photographs from patients treated at Tottori University Hospital between 2014 and 2022. Two supervised learning models were developed: a Categorical Classification Model (CCM) for multi-class prediction, and a Binary Classification Model (BCM) implementing a two-step binary classification. Necrotic tissue was categorized based on the DESIGN-R® scale into three classes: n0 (no necrosis), N3 (soft necrosis), and N6 (hard, adherent necrosis). The models' performance was evaluated using standard classification metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CCM showed recall rates of 0.7824 for n0, 0.6620 for N3, and 1.0000 for N6. In contrast, the BCM achieved higher recall rates: 0.9074 for n0, 0.9884 for N3, and 1.0000 for N6. Overall metrics for CCM were: accuracy 0.8148, precision 0.8166, and F-1 score 0.8089. The BCM surpassed these with an accuracy of 0.8711, precision 0.8418, and F-1 score 0.8508. Across all performance indicators, the BCM demonstrated superior classification capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that AI, particularly the binary classification approach, can enhance necrotic tissue assessment in pressure injury evaluation. The BCM consistently outperformed the CCM, supporting its potential as a reliable tool to assist clinicians in objective and standardized pressure injury evaluation using the DESIGN-R® framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":"68 3","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2025.08.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of pressure injuries is critical in clinical settings, especially when evaluating necrotic tissue using the DESIGN-R® scale widely adopted in Japan. This study aimed to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into the evaluation process to enhance diagnostic consistency and accuracy. By leveraging deep learning and convolutional neural networks, we explored the potential of AI models in classifying necrotic tissue from wound images.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic medical records and wound photographs from patients treated at Tottori University Hospital between 2014 and 2022. Two supervised learning models were developed: a Categorical Classification Model (CCM) for multi-class prediction, and a Binary Classification Model (BCM) implementing a two-step binary classification. Necrotic tissue was categorized based on the DESIGN-R® scale into three classes: n0 (no necrosis), N3 (soft necrosis), and N6 (hard, adherent necrosis). The models' performance was evaluated using standard classification metrics.

Results: The CCM showed recall rates of 0.7824 for n0, 0.6620 for N3, and 1.0000 for N6. In contrast, the BCM achieved higher recall rates: 0.9074 for n0, 0.9884 for N3, and 1.0000 for N6. Overall metrics for CCM were: accuracy 0.8148, precision 0.8166, and F-1 score 0.8089. The BCM surpassed these with an accuracy of 0.8711, precision 0.8418, and F-1 score 0.8508. Across all performance indicators, the BCM demonstrated superior classification capability.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that AI, particularly the binary classification approach, can enhance necrotic tissue assessment in pressure injury evaluation. The BCM consistently outperformed the CCM, supporting its potential as a reliable tool to assist clinicians in objective and standardized pressure injury evaluation using the DESIGN-R® framework.

利用人工智能提高诊断成像的准确性:一种评估压力损伤中坏死组织的方法。
背景:在临床环境中,准确评估压力损伤是至关重要的,特别是在使用日本广泛采用的DESIGN-R®量表评估坏死组织时。本研究旨在将人工智能(AI)整合到评估过程中,以提高诊断的一致性和准确性。通过利用深度学习和卷积神经网络,我们探索了人工智能模型在从伤口图像中分类坏死组织方面的潜力。方法:回顾性观察研究2014年至2022年在鸟取大学医院治疗的患者的电子病历和伤口照片。开发了两种监督学习模型:用于多类预测的类别分类模型(CCM)和用于两步二元分类的二元分类模型(BCM)。坏死组织根据DESIGN-R®分级分为三类:n0(无坏死)、N3(软坏死)和N6(硬、粘附性坏死)。使用标准分类指标评估模型的性能。结果:CCM对n0的召回率为0.7824,N3的召回率为0.6620,N6的召回率为1.0000。相比之下,BCM获得了更高的召回率:n0为0.9074,N3为0.9884,N6为1.0000。CCM的总体指标为:准确度0.8148,精密度0.8166,F-1评分0.8089。BCM的准确度为0.8711,精密度为0.8418,F-1得分为0.8508。在所有性能指标中,BCM显示出优越的分类能力。结论:本研究表明,人工智能,特别是二元分类方法在压力损伤评估中可以增强坏死组织的评估。BCM始终优于CCM,支持其作为可靠工具的潜力,帮助临床医生使用DESIGN-R®框架进行客观和标准化的压力损伤评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonago acta medica
Yonago acta medica MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan. The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education. Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community. Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信