Acinar cell scoring on histology of the pancreatic stump reinforces subjective texture assessment during pancreatoduodenectomy to predict post-operative pancreatic Fistula

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shoichi Irie , Yoshihiro Mise , Mamiko Miyashita , Hirofumi Ichida , Ryuji Yoshioka , Hiroshi Imamura , Shuko Nojiri , Yuki Fukumura , Akio Saiura
{"title":"Acinar cell scoring on histology of the pancreatic stump reinforces subjective texture assessment during pancreatoduodenectomy to predict post-operative pancreatic Fistula","authors":"Shoichi Irie ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Mise ,&nbsp;Mamiko Miyashita ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Ichida ,&nbsp;Ryuji Yoshioka ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Imamura ,&nbsp;Shuko Nojiri ,&nbsp;Yuki Fukumura ,&nbsp;Akio Saiura","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.07.408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>The surgical pancreatic texture (SPT), which is determined by palpation during surgery, can predict postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF) but is subjective. This observational study examined the accuracy and feasibility of our objective “Acinar Score (AS)” in predicting POPF based on acinar cell counts histologically confirmed during surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a single institution were enrolled. An expert pathologist evaluated and scored acinar cell density, along a scale from 1 (full acinar density) to 5 (no cells), on hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained slides of the pancreatic resection margin. The accuracy of POPF (grade B/C) prediction between the SPT and the AS was compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 55 patients with a hard pancreas, discrepancies between intraoperative palpation and histological acinar cell density (≥50 %; AS 1–2) were observed in 22 cases (40 %), of whom 4 (18.2 %) developed POPF. Patients with &lt;50 % acinar density (AS 3–5) did not have POPF, irrespective of the pancreatic texture. Multivariate analysis revealed that AS≥ 2 and SPT were independent predictors of POPF. The combined model incorporating both SPT and AS yielded a higher AUC than either factor alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Objective acinar cell density assessment highlights discrepancies in traditional tactile evaluations for predicting POPF. AS strengthens the subjective findings of pancreatic texture evaluation in patients undergoing PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":"25 6","pages":"Pages 967-973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390325005526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives

The surgical pancreatic texture (SPT), which is determined by palpation during surgery, can predict postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF) but is subjective. This observational study examined the accuracy and feasibility of our objective “Acinar Score (AS)” in predicting POPF based on acinar cell counts histologically confirmed during surgery.

Methods

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a single institution were enrolled. An expert pathologist evaluated and scored acinar cell density, along a scale from 1 (full acinar density) to 5 (no cells), on hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained slides of the pancreatic resection margin. The accuracy of POPF (grade B/C) prediction between the SPT and the AS was compared.

Results

Among the 55 patients with a hard pancreas, discrepancies between intraoperative palpation and histological acinar cell density (≥50 %; AS 1–2) were observed in 22 cases (40 %), of whom 4 (18.2 %) developed POPF. Patients with <50 % acinar density (AS 3–5) did not have POPF, irrespective of the pancreatic texture. Multivariate analysis revealed that AS≥ 2 and SPT were independent predictors of POPF. The combined model incorporating both SPT and AS yielded a higher AUC than either factor alone.

Conclusions

Objective acinar cell density assessment highlights discrepancies in traditional tactile evaluations for predicting POPF. AS strengthens the subjective findings of pancreatic texture evaluation in patients undergoing PD.
胰腺残端组织学上的腺泡细胞评分加强了胰十二指肠切除术中对胰瘘的主观质地评估。
背景/目的:手术胰腺质地(SPT)是通过术中触诊确定的,可以预测术后胰瘘(POPF),但这是主观的。本观察性研究检验了我们的客观“腺泡评分(AS)”预测POPF的准确性和可行性,该预测基于手术中组织学证实的腺泡细胞计数。方法:纳入在单一机构接受胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的患者。在苏木精和伊红染色的胰腺切除边缘切片上,病理学专家评估并评分了腺泡细胞密度,从1(全腺泡密度)到5(无细胞)。比较了SPT和AS对POPF (B/C级)的预测精度。结果:55例胰腺硬质患者,术中触诊与组织学腺泡细胞密度差异(≥50%;22例(40%)出现AS 1-2,其中4例(18.2%)发生POPF。结论:客观的腺泡细胞密度评估强调了传统触觉评估预测POPF的差异。AS加强了PD患者胰腺质地评价的主观发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信