Facilitators and barriers to implementing Hearing Conservation Programmes in industrial workplaces: a systematic review.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hanis Syazwani Ab Fatah, Siti Munira Yasin, Kamarulzaman Muzaini, Mohammad Nasir Abdullah
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to implementing Hearing Conservation Programmes in industrial workplaces: a systematic review.","authors":"Hanis Syazwani Ab Fatah, Siti Munira Yasin, Kamarulzaman Muzaini, Mohammad Nasir Abdullah","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains a serious occupational risk in industrial settings with constant high noise exposure. Although Hearing Conservation Programmes (HCPs) are widely implemented, their effectiveness is limited by funding shortages, poor training and low compliance. This systematic review examines factors that facilitate or hinder HCP implementation, variations in program outcomes and the influence of employee attitudes, behavior and regulatory compliance. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practices Project (EPHPP) tool, and risk of bias in non-randomized studies was evaluated with Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for English-language studies on industrial HCPs published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible designs included randomised or non-randomised trials, observational studies and mixed methods. Data extraction was guided by a standardised form capturing programme components such as training, monitoring, compliance strategies, participant characteristics and outcome indicators, which included hearing protection device usage, NIHL incidence and compliance.Nine studies from various industries met the criteria. Key facilitators included management commitment, worker involvement and tailored interventions that improved compliance and reduced NIHL. Common barriers were inconsistent training, discomfort with protective equipment and gaps between programme goals and workplace conditions. The findings also highlighted that consistent regulatory compliance and a supportive organisational culture play a critical role in the successful implementation of HCPs.Effective HCPs require context-specific designs addressing workplace barriers and enhancing facilitators. Future research should prioritise longitudinal studies to evaluate long-term sustainability and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"354-362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains a serious occupational risk in industrial settings with constant high noise exposure. Although Hearing Conservation Programmes (HCPs) are widely implemented, their effectiveness is limited by funding shortages, poor training and low compliance. This systematic review examines factors that facilitate or hinder HCP implementation, variations in program outcomes and the influence of employee attitudes, behavior and regulatory compliance. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practices Project (EPHPP) tool, and risk of bias in non-randomized studies was evaluated with Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for English-language studies on industrial HCPs published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible designs included randomised or non-randomised trials, observational studies and mixed methods. Data extraction was guided by a standardised form capturing programme components such as training, monitoring, compliance strategies, participant characteristics and outcome indicators, which included hearing protection device usage, NIHL incidence and compliance.Nine studies from various industries met the criteria. Key facilitators included management commitment, worker involvement and tailored interventions that improved compliance and reduced NIHL. Common barriers were inconsistent training, discomfort with protective equipment and gaps between programme goals and workplace conditions. The findings also highlighted that consistent regulatory compliance and a supportive organisational culture play a critical role in the successful implementation of HCPs.Effective HCPs require context-specific designs addressing workplace barriers and enhancing facilitators. Future research should prioritise longitudinal studies to evaluate long-term sustainability and impact.

在工业工作场所实施听力保护计划的促进因素和障碍:系统综述。
噪声性听力损失(NIHL)仍然是工业环境中持续高噪声暴露的严重职业风险。虽然听力保护计划(HCPs)得到了广泛的实施,但其有效性受到资金短缺、培训不足和依从性低的限制。本系统综述考察了促进或阻碍HCP实施的因素、项目结果的变化以及员工态度、行为和法规遵从性的影响。使用有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具评估方法学质量,使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)评估非随机研究的偏倚风险。我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane,检索了2000年至2024年间发表的关于工业hcp的英语研究。符合条件的设计包括随机或非随机试验、观察性研究和混合方法。数据提取由一个标准化表格指导,该表格捕获了诸如培训、监测、依从性策略、参与者特征和结果指标等项目组成部分,其中包括听力保护装置的使用、NIHL发生率和依从性。来自不同行业的九项研究符合标准。关键的促进因素包括管理层的承诺、员工的参与和量身定制的干预措施,这些措施提高了依从性,减少了NIHL。常见的障碍是不一致的培训、不舒服的防护设备以及方案目标与工作场所条件之间的差距。研究结果还强调,始终如一的法规遵从性和支持性的组织文化在成功实施hcp方面发挥着关键作用。有效的HCPs需要针对具体情况的设计,解决工作场所的障碍并加强促进因素。未来的研究应优先考虑纵向研究,以评估长期可持续性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信