{"title":"Evaluating food portion estimation accuracy with multi-angle photographs.","authors":"In-Young Choi, Mi-Hyun Kim","doi":"10.4162/nrp.2025.19.4.605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of estimating food quantities using photographs taken at different angles to increase the accuracy of dietary intake surveys.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>Eighty-two adults (41 males and 41 females), ranging in age from their 20s to 50s, participated in the study. The participants observed 6 types of food-cooked rice, soup, grilled fish, vegetables, kimchi, and beverages-arranged to simulate an actual meal. After a 3-min observation, they were asked to move to another room and select a photograph that they believed matched the observed food amount. Photographs of each food were taken from 3 different angles (0°, 45°, 70° for solid foods; 45°, 60°, 70° for beverages). The accuracy, underestimation, and overestimation rates were calculated for each type of food and angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cooked rice had the highest accuracy at 45° (74.4%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001), which improved to 85.4% when multiple angles were combined. Soup showed lower accuracy across all angles and had higher overestimation rates. The angles for the grilled fish did not show significant differences, but the accuracy slightly improved when the angles were combined. For vegetables, the accuracy increased to 53.7% when the angles were combined (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Kimchi showed the highest accuracy at 45° (52.4%), and beverages showed the highest accuracy at 70° (73.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The accuracy of food quantity estimation varies depending on the type of food and the shooting angle. For solid foods, 45° provided the best accuracy, whereas 70° was most accurate for beverages. Combining different angles improved the estimation accuracy for most food types.</p>","PeriodicalId":19232,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research and Practice","volume":"19 4","pages":"605-620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.4.605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of estimating food quantities using photographs taken at different angles to increase the accuracy of dietary intake surveys.
Subjects/methods: Eighty-two adults (41 males and 41 females), ranging in age from their 20s to 50s, participated in the study. The participants observed 6 types of food-cooked rice, soup, grilled fish, vegetables, kimchi, and beverages-arranged to simulate an actual meal. After a 3-min observation, they were asked to move to another room and select a photograph that they believed matched the observed food amount. Photographs of each food were taken from 3 different angles (0°, 45°, 70° for solid foods; 45°, 60°, 70° for beverages). The accuracy, underestimation, and overestimation rates were calculated for each type of food and angle.
Results: Cooked rice had the highest accuracy at 45° (74.4%) (P < 0.001), which improved to 85.4% when multiple angles were combined. Soup showed lower accuracy across all angles and had higher overestimation rates. The angles for the grilled fish did not show significant differences, but the accuracy slightly improved when the angles were combined. For vegetables, the accuracy increased to 53.7% when the angles were combined (P < 0.05). Kimchi showed the highest accuracy at 45° (52.4%), and beverages showed the highest accuracy at 70° (73.2%).
Conclusion: The accuracy of food quantity estimation varies depending on the type of food and the shooting angle. For solid foods, 45° provided the best accuracy, whereas 70° was most accurate for beverages. Combining different angles improved the estimation accuracy for most food types.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Research and Practice (NRP) is an official journal, jointly published by the Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition since 2007. The journal had been published quarterly at the initial stage and has been published bimonthly since 2010.
NRP aims to stimulate research and practice across diverse areas of human nutrition. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts on nutrition biochemistry and metabolism, community nutrition, nutrition and disease management, nutritional epidemiology, nutrition education, foodservice management in the following categories: Original Research Articles, Notes, Communications, and Reviews. Reviews will be received by the invitation of the editors only. Statements made and opinions expressed in the manuscripts published in this Journal represent the views of authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Societies.