Washing Chicken Carcasses With Water Proves Unreliable as a Means of Reducing Bacterial Contamination in Unhygienic Market Conditions in Burkina Faso

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Michel Dione , Guy Ilboudo , Adama Paré , Laurencia T. Songré-Ouattara , Michelle D. Danyluk , Claudia Ganser , Theodore J.D. Knight-Jones , Arie H. Havelaar
{"title":"Washing Chicken Carcasses With Water Proves Unreliable as a Means of Reducing Bacterial Contamination in Unhygienic Market Conditions in Burkina Faso","authors":"Michel Dione ,&nbsp;Guy Ilboudo ,&nbsp;Adama Paré ,&nbsp;Laurencia T. Songré-Ouattara ,&nbsp;Michelle D. Danyluk ,&nbsp;Claudia Ganser ,&nbsp;Theodore J.D. Knight-Jones ,&nbsp;Arie H. Havelaar","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Poultry meat is a major contributor to the burden of foodborne disease in sub-Saharan Africa, with <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>Campylobacter</em> among the most common causative agents. In Burkina Faso, most chicken meat is processed and sold in informal markets where hygiene conditions are poor, and postevisceration washing is used to clean carcasses and potentially reduce microbial contamination. This study evaluated the impact of carcass washing on the prevalence and concentration of <em>Salmonella enterica</em> and thermotolerant <em>Campylobacter</em> spp. on chicken carcasses in Ouagadougou. Paired skin samples were collected before and after washing from 53 vendors, and bacterial counts were analyzed using censored statistical models that accounted for values below the Limit of Detection (LOD). Washing reduced the mean concentration of <em>Salmonella</em> by 0.6 log<sub>10</sub> (cfu/g) but did not change the concentration of <em>Campylobacter</em>. Concentrations of both pathogens after washing were significantly correlated with concentrations before washing. Regression coefficients for both pathogens were significantly different from 1 (0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.71; and 0.32, 0.15–0.50, respectively), suggesting cross-contamination. The number of birds slaughtered per batch of fresh water varied between 2 and 150, with a median of 50 birds, and was significantly correlated with the concentration after washing for <em>Salmonella</em>; regression coefficient 0.81; 0.08–1.55 log<sub>10</sub> (birds/batch), but not for <em>Campylobacter</em> (0.32, −0.17 to 0.81). These findings suggest that under current market practices, carcass washing offers limited benefits and may contribute to microbial dispersion. Improved hygiene protocols and revised water management practices are needed to reduce contamination risks and improve food safety in informal poultry markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 10","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poultry meat is a major contributor to the burden of foodborne disease in sub-Saharan Africa, with Salmonella and Campylobacter among the most common causative agents. In Burkina Faso, most chicken meat is processed and sold in informal markets where hygiene conditions are poor, and postevisceration washing is used to clean carcasses and potentially reduce microbial contamination. This study evaluated the impact of carcass washing on the prevalence and concentration of Salmonella enterica and thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses in Ouagadougou. Paired skin samples were collected before and after washing from 53 vendors, and bacterial counts were analyzed using censored statistical models that accounted for values below the Limit of Detection (LOD). Washing reduced the mean concentration of Salmonella by 0.6 log10 (cfu/g) but did not change the concentration of Campylobacter. Concentrations of both pathogens after washing were significantly correlated with concentrations before washing. Regression coefficients for both pathogens were significantly different from 1 (0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.71; and 0.32, 0.15–0.50, respectively), suggesting cross-contamination. The number of birds slaughtered per batch of fresh water varied between 2 and 150, with a median of 50 birds, and was significantly correlated with the concentration after washing for Salmonella; regression coefficient 0.81; 0.08–1.55 log10 (birds/batch), but not for Campylobacter (0.32, −0.17 to 0.81). These findings suggest that under current market practices, carcass washing offers limited benefits and may contribute to microbial dispersion. Improved hygiene protocols and revised water management practices are needed to reduce contamination risks and improve food safety in informal poultry markets.
事实证明,在布基纳法索不卫生的市场条件下,用水清洗鸡尸体作为减少细菌污染的一种手段是不可靠的。
禽肉是撒哈拉以南非洲地区食源性疾病负担的一个主要因素,沙门氏菌和弯曲杆菌是最常见的病原体。在布基纳法索,大多数鸡肉是在卫生条件较差的非正规市场加工和销售的,内脏取出后清洗用于清洁胴体,并可能减少微生物污染。本研究评价了屠体清洗对瓦加杜古鸡胴体上肠沙门氏菌和耐热弯曲杆菌感染率和浓度的影响。从53个供应商中收集洗涤前后的成对皮肤样本,并使用审查统计模型分析细菌计数,该模型的值低于检测限(LOD)。清洗使沙门氏菌的平均浓度降低了0.6 log10 (cfu/g),但弯曲杆菌的浓度没有变化。两种病原菌洗涤后的浓度与洗涤前的浓度显著相关。两种病原菌的回归系数均为1(0.37,95%可信区间为0.03-0.71;0.32, 0.15 ~ 0.50),提示交叉污染。每批淡水屠宰的禽鸟数量在2 ~ 150只之间,中位数为50只,与清洗后沙门氏菌的浓度显著相关;回归系数0.81;0.08-1.55 log10(只/批),但弯曲杆菌没有(0.32,-0.17-0.81)。这些发现表明,在目前的市场实践下,屠体清洗提供的效益有限,可能有助于微生物的分散。需要改进卫生规程和修订水管理做法,以减少污染风险并改善非正规家禽市场的食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信