Michel Dione , Guy Ilboudo , Adama Paré , Laurencia T. Songré-Ouattara , Michelle D. Danyluk , Claudia Ganser , Theodore J.D. Knight-Jones , Arie H. Havelaar
{"title":"Washing Chicken Carcasses With Water Proves Unreliable as a Means of Reducing Bacterial Contamination in Unhygienic Market Conditions in Burkina Faso","authors":"Michel Dione , Guy Ilboudo , Adama Paré , Laurencia T. Songré-Ouattara , Michelle D. Danyluk , Claudia Ganser , Theodore J.D. Knight-Jones , Arie H. Havelaar","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Poultry meat is a major contributor to the burden of foodborne disease in sub-Saharan Africa, with <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>Campylobacter</em> among the most common causative agents. In Burkina Faso, most chicken meat is processed and sold in informal markets where hygiene conditions are poor, and postevisceration washing is used to clean carcasses and potentially reduce microbial contamination. This study evaluated the impact of carcass washing on the prevalence and concentration of <em>Salmonella enterica</em> and thermotolerant <em>Campylobacter</em> spp. on chicken carcasses in Ouagadougou. Paired skin samples were collected before and after washing from 53 vendors, and bacterial counts were analyzed using censored statistical models that accounted for values below the Limit of Detection (LOD). Washing reduced the mean concentration of <em>Salmonella</em> by 0.6 log<sub>10</sub> (cfu/g) but did not change the concentration of <em>Campylobacter</em>. Concentrations of both pathogens after washing were significantly correlated with concentrations before washing. Regression coefficients for both pathogens were significantly different from 1 (0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.71; and 0.32, 0.15–0.50, respectively), suggesting cross-contamination. The number of birds slaughtered per batch of fresh water varied between 2 and 150, with a median of 50 birds, and was significantly correlated with the concentration after washing for <em>Salmonella</em>; regression coefficient 0.81; 0.08–1.55 log<sub>10</sub> (birds/batch), but not for <em>Campylobacter</em> (0.32, −0.17 to 0.81). These findings suggest that under current market practices, carcass washing offers limited benefits and may contribute to microbial dispersion. Improved hygiene protocols and revised water management practices are needed to reduce contamination risks and improve food safety in informal poultry markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 10","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Poultry meat is a major contributor to the burden of foodborne disease in sub-Saharan Africa, with Salmonella and Campylobacter among the most common causative agents. In Burkina Faso, most chicken meat is processed and sold in informal markets where hygiene conditions are poor, and postevisceration washing is used to clean carcasses and potentially reduce microbial contamination. This study evaluated the impact of carcass washing on the prevalence and concentration of Salmonella enterica and thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses in Ouagadougou. Paired skin samples were collected before and after washing from 53 vendors, and bacterial counts were analyzed using censored statistical models that accounted for values below the Limit of Detection (LOD). Washing reduced the mean concentration of Salmonella by 0.6 log10 (cfu/g) but did not change the concentration of Campylobacter. Concentrations of both pathogens after washing were significantly correlated with concentrations before washing. Regression coefficients for both pathogens were significantly different from 1 (0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.71; and 0.32, 0.15–0.50, respectively), suggesting cross-contamination. The number of birds slaughtered per batch of fresh water varied between 2 and 150, with a median of 50 birds, and was significantly correlated with the concentration after washing for Salmonella; regression coefficient 0.81; 0.08–1.55 log10 (birds/batch), but not for Campylobacter (0.32, −0.17 to 0.81). These findings suggest that under current market practices, carcass washing offers limited benefits and may contribute to microbial dispersion. Improved hygiene protocols and revised water management practices are needed to reduce contamination risks and improve food safety in informal poultry markets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.