Investigating perceptions and usage of fertility supplements: a mixed methods analysis of a large online forum.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ana F Tomlinson, Meghana Chapalamadugu, Aishwarya Hombal, Suset Rodriguez, Pasquale Patrizio
{"title":"Investigating perceptions and usage of fertility supplements: a mixed methods analysis of a large online forum.","authors":"Ana F Tomlinson, Meghana Chapalamadugu, Aishwarya Hombal, Suset Rodriguez, Pasquale Patrizio","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03625-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to characterize assisted reproductive technology patients' online discussions of fertility supplements to better understand how this audience uses supplements, their attitudes toward perceived effects of the supplement, and the topics patients sought advice on regarding supplements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used mixed methods, sequential exploratory design. We extracted public posts from the Reddit forum, \"r/IVF.\" Posts about fertility supplements were categorized by the described use of supplements and perceived effect of the supplement. Posts in each qualitative category were then quantified, and post author characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred sixty-nine posts were included in the analysis. Two hundred nine posts identified specific supplements, and the most frequently mentioned included ubiquinone, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, dehydroepiandrosterone, and myo-inositol. Two hundred seventy-nine authors reported taking supplements; 9.3% reported a positive perceived effect, 12.9% reported a negative perceived effect, and 21.1% asked for advice regarding their supplements. In the remaining 90 posts, 10% of authors expressed concerns and 90% expressed interest in taking supplements. One hundred ninety-seven posts included the indication for using assisted reproductive technology, the most common being diminished ovarian reserve or male factor infertility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients are using supplements with the goal of increasing their chance of assisted reproductive technology success and are seeking guidance on their use online. Some frequently mentioned supplements have limited research and unknown efficacy. The extensive discourse about supplements observed in this study reflects a need for increased guidance and evidence-based medical advice on how patients may use supplements safely and appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03625-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to characterize assisted reproductive technology patients' online discussions of fertility supplements to better understand how this audience uses supplements, their attitudes toward perceived effects of the supplement, and the topics patients sought advice on regarding supplements.

Methods: This study used mixed methods, sequential exploratory design. We extracted public posts from the Reddit forum, "r/IVF." Posts about fertility supplements were categorized by the described use of supplements and perceived effect of the supplement. Posts in each qualitative category were then quantified, and post author characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Three hundred sixty-nine posts were included in the analysis. Two hundred nine posts identified specific supplements, and the most frequently mentioned included ubiquinone, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, dehydroepiandrosterone, and myo-inositol. Two hundred seventy-nine authors reported taking supplements; 9.3% reported a positive perceived effect, 12.9% reported a negative perceived effect, and 21.1% asked for advice regarding their supplements. In the remaining 90 posts, 10% of authors expressed concerns and 90% expressed interest in taking supplements. One hundred ninety-seven posts included the indication for using assisted reproductive technology, the most common being diminished ovarian reserve or male factor infertility.

Conclusion: Many patients are using supplements with the goal of increasing their chance of assisted reproductive technology success and are seeking guidance on their use online. Some frequently mentioned supplements have limited research and unknown efficacy. The extensive discourse about supplements observed in this study reflects a need for increased guidance and evidence-based medical advice on how patients may use supplements safely and appropriately.

调查对生育补充剂的认知和使用:一个大型在线论坛的混合方法分析。
目的:本研究旨在描述辅助生殖技术患者对生育补充剂的在线讨论,以更好地了解这些受众如何使用补充剂,他们对补充剂的感知效果的态度,以及患者就补充剂寻求建议的主题。方法:本研究采用混合方法,序贯探索性设计。我们从Reddit论坛“r/IVF”中提取了公开帖子。关于生育补充剂的帖子被归类为描述补充剂的使用和补充剂的感知效果。然后对每个定性类别的帖子进行量化,并使用描述性统计分析帖子作者特征。结果:369篇文章被纳入分析。209个帖子确定了特定的补充剂,最常提到的包括泛醌、维生素D、omega-3脂肪酸、脱氢表雄酮和肌醇。279位作者报告服用补充剂;9.3%的人报告了积极的感知效果,12.9%的人报告了消极的感知效果,21.1%的人询问了有关补充剂的建议。在剩下的90篇文章中,10%的作者表示担心,90%的作者表示有兴趣服用补充剂。197个帖子包括使用辅助生殖技术的适应症,最常见的是卵巢储备减少或男性因素不育。结论:许多患者正在使用补充剂,目的是增加辅助生殖技术成功的机会,并在网上寻求使用补充剂的指导。一些经常被提及的补品研究有限,功效不明。在本研究中观察到的关于补充剂的广泛论述反映了对患者如何安全、适当地使用补充剂增加指导和循证医学建议的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信