The effectiveness of gender-based violence prevention among adolescents aged 10 to 19 years in Southeast Asia: a systematic review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hoa Hong Nguyen, Kien G To, Van T H Hoang, Lu Gram, Kathryn M Yount
{"title":"The effectiveness of gender-based violence prevention among adolescents aged 10 to 19 years in Southeast Asia: a systematic review.","authors":"Hoa Hong Nguyen, Kien G To, Van T H Hoang, Lu Gram, Kathryn M Yount","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02514-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender-based violence (GBV) is a major public health problem with wide-ranging negative physical and mental health consequences for survivors. The global economic costs of GBV are estimated at US$1.5 trillion. Adolescence is a high-risk period for GBV. The evidence-based GBV prevention programs among adolescents in Southeast Asia are not well understood. This paper synthesizes GBV prevention intervention studies in this region's adolescents aged 10-19 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were used to search for potential articles published up to September 3, 2024. We screened and identified articles following consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool for observational and quasi-experimental studies and the RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven of 1689 identified articles were included in the review (four quasi-experimental designs, two pre-test and post-test designs, and one cluster randomized controlled trial). Most studies (6/7) focused on school-based educational programs. The risk of bias in the cluster randomized controlled trial was \"some concern\" level, compared with the moderate to serious level of the non-randomized studies. One pre- and post-test study directly measured GBV behaviour and found that children reported fewer experiences of physical assault (mean difference: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.6) and psychological aggression (1.5; 0.8, 2.3) after the intervention. The remaining studies evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of participants as primary outcomes in sexual violence prevention programs. Three of the five studies that assessed changes in knowledge showed significant improvements. Inconsistent findings were found in association with attitudes and skills of GBV intervention prevention programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBV intervention studies among adolescents in Southeast Asia are rare, and evidence of effectiveness is generally weak. Rigorous RCTs that assess program impacts on GBV behaviour, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and skills, are needed. Programs that incorporate classroom activities and online learning with Facebook/Zalo/Instagram assignments and games may show promise for rigorous evaluation in Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023476059).</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02514-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a major public health problem with wide-ranging negative physical and mental health consequences for survivors. The global economic costs of GBV are estimated at US$1.5 trillion. Adolescence is a high-risk period for GBV. The evidence-based GBV prevention programs among adolescents in Southeast Asia are not well understood. This paper synthesizes GBV prevention intervention studies in this region's adolescents aged 10-19 years.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were used to search for potential articles published up to September 3, 2024. We screened and identified articles following consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool for observational and quasi-experimental studies and the RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials.

Results: Seven of 1689 identified articles were included in the review (four quasi-experimental designs, two pre-test and post-test designs, and one cluster randomized controlled trial). Most studies (6/7) focused on school-based educational programs. The risk of bias in the cluster randomized controlled trial was "some concern" level, compared with the moderate to serious level of the non-randomized studies. One pre- and post-test study directly measured GBV behaviour and found that children reported fewer experiences of physical assault (mean difference: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.6) and psychological aggression (1.5; 0.8, 2.3) after the intervention. The remaining studies evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of participants as primary outcomes in sexual violence prevention programs. Three of the five studies that assessed changes in knowledge showed significant improvements. Inconsistent findings were found in association with attitudes and skills of GBV intervention prevention programs.

Conclusions: GBV intervention studies among adolescents in Southeast Asia are rare, and evidence of effectiveness is generally weak. Rigorous RCTs that assess program impacts on GBV behaviour, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and skills, are needed. Programs that incorporate classroom activities and online learning with Facebook/Zalo/Instagram assignments and games may show promise for rigorous evaluation in Southeast Asia.

Registration: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023476059).

Abstract Image

东南亚10至19岁青少年性别暴力预防的有效性:系统回顾。
背景:基于性别的暴力是一个重大的公共卫生问题,对幸存者的身心健康产生广泛的负面影响。性别暴力的全球经济成本估计为1.5万亿美元。青春期是性别暴力的高危期。以证据为基础的东南亚青少年性别暴力预防项目还没有得到很好的理解。本文综合了该地区10-19岁青少年性别暴力预防干预研究。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science和PsycINFO被用来搜索2024年9月3日之前发表的潜在文章。我们按照一致的纳入和排除标准筛选和识别文章。我们使用robins - 1工具评估观察性和准实验性研究的偏倚风险,使用rob2工具评估随机对照试验。结果:1689篇文献中有7篇被纳入本综述(4篇准实验设计,2篇前测和后测设计,1篇聚类随机对照试验)。大多数研究(6/7)集中在校本教育项目上。聚类随机对照试验的偏倚风险为“一些关注”水平,而非随机对照试验的偏倚风险为中度至重度。一项测试前和测试后的研究直接测量了性别暴力行为,发现儿童报告的身体攻击经历较少(平均差异:1.1;95% CI: 0.6, 1.6)和心理攻击(1.5;0.8, 2.3)。其余的研究将参与者的知识、态度和技能作为性暴力预防项目的主要成果进行评估。在评估知识变化的五项研究中,有三项显示出显著的改善。与性别暴力干预预防项目的态度和技能相关的调查结果不一致。结论:东南亚青少年性别暴力干预研究很少,有效性证据普遍不足。需要进行严格的随机对照试验,评估项目对性别暴力行为以及知识、态度和技能的影响。将课堂活动和在线学习与Facebook/Zalo/Instagram作业和游戏相结合的项目可能会在东南亚得到严格的评估。注册:本系统综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023476059)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信