Tero I Ala-Kokko, Jaana M Karhu, Pasi Lehto, Sinikka Sälkiö, Pasi Ohtonen, Hannu Syrjälä
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of ICU-acquired infections with a focus on bloodstream infections: a single-center retrospective registry study.","authors":"Tero I Ala-Kokko, Jaana M Karhu, Pasi Lehto, Sinikka Sälkiö, Pasi Ohtonen, Hannu Syrjälä","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02621-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have an increased risk of bacteremia. We aimed to investigate the 5-year outcome of ICU-acquired infections comparing them with ICU patients without new infections. Our second aim was to compare the outcome of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and fungal ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective registry study occurred in an academic teaching hospital during 2000-2017 in a mixed adult ICU consisting of patients who stayed longer than 48 h in the ICU. Data was retrieved from the ICU and hospital electronic data management systems. Three groups were included: no infection and no new antimicrobial treatment, a new ICU-acquired infection with negative blood cultures (BCs), and a new ICU-acquired BSI. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1857 had no infection and 768 developed an ICU-acquired infection with positive BCs in 195 cases (25.4%). The adjusted HR was 2.03 (95% CI from 1.76-2.35, p < 0.001) for the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality. The highest median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was 7.0 (5.0-8.0) for the no-infection group, 9.0 (7.0-10.0) for the BC-negative ICU-acquired infection group, and 12.0 (9.0-15.0) for the ICU-acquired BSI patients (p < 0.001). The crude 30-day mortalities in the no-infection, the BC-negative, and the BSI groups were 98 (5.5%), 58 (10.1%), and 51 (26.0%), respectively (p < 0.001). The highest median SOFA for Gram-positive BSIs was 11.0 (8.0-13.0), for Gram-negative BSIs 13.0 (11.0-16.0), and for fungal BSIs 12.5 (10.0-16.0) (p = 0.01). The need for RRT was 23.2% (19) in Gram-positive, 29.8% (14) in Gram-negative, and 48.1% (25) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.01). The crude ICU-mortalities were 12.2% (10) in Gram-positive BSIs, 31.9% (15) in Gram-negative BSIs, and 11.5% (6) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.008). Patients with fungal BSI had the worst 5-year outcome, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ICU-acquired infections had three times higher 5-year mortality than non-infected ICU patients. ICU-acquired Gram-negative BSIs had the highest ICU mortality, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-negative and Gram-positive ICU-acquired BSIs. Fungal BSI showed the worst long-term outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02621-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have an increased risk of bacteremia. We aimed to investigate the 5-year outcome of ICU-acquired infections comparing them with ICU patients without new infections. Our second aim was to compare the outcome of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and fungal ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (BSIs).
Methods: This single-center retrospective registry study occurred in an academic teaching hospital during 2000-2017 in a mixed adult ICU consisting of patients who stayed longer than 48 h in the ICU. Data was retrieved from the ICU and hospital electronic data management systems. Three groups were included: no infection and no new antimicrobial treatment, a new ICU-acquired infection with negative blood cultures (BCs), and a new ICU-acquired BSI. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality.
Results: 1857 had no infection and 768 developed an ICU-acquired infection with positive BCs in 195 cases (25.4%). The adjusted HR was 2.03 (95% CI from 1.76-2.35, p < 0.001) for the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality. The highest median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was 7.0 (5.0-8.0) for the no-infection group, 9.0 (7.0-10.0) for the BC-negative ICU-acquired infection group, and 12.0 (9.0-15.0) for the ICU-acquired BSI patients (p < 0.001). The crude 30-day mortalities in the no-infection, the BC-negative, and the BSI groups were 98 (5.5%), 58 (10.1%), and 51 (26.0%), respectively (p < 0.001). The highest median SOFA for Gram-positive BSIs was 11.0 (8.0-13.0), for Gram-negative BSIs 13.0 (11.0-16.0), and for fungal BSIs 12.5 (10.0-16.0) (p = 0.01). The need for RRT was 23.2% (19) in Gram-positive, 29.8% (14) in Gram-negative, and 48.1% (25) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.01). The crude ICU-mortalities were 12.2% (10) in Gram-positive BSIs, 31.9% (15) in Gram-negative BSIs, and 11.5% (6) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.008). Patients with fungal BSI had the worst 5-year outcome, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSIs.
Conclusions: Patients with ICU-acquired infections had three times higher 5-year mortality than non-infected ICU patients. ICU-acquired Gram-negative BSIs had the highest ICU mortality, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-negative and Gram-positive ICU-acquired BSIs. Fungal BSI showed the worst long-term outcome.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.