Lateromedial and oblique radiographs detect most fetlock pathologies as effectively as a full series in horses.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Northwood, D Berner
{"title":"Lateromedial and oblique radiographs detect most fetlock pathologies as effectively as a full series in horses.","authors":"A Northwood, D Berner","doi":"10.1111/evj.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiographic protocols for the metacarpo-/tarsophalangeal joint during pre-purchase examinations (PPE) vary internationally, but their impact on pathology detection remains unclear. Optimising imaging protocols is essential to balance diagnostic accuracy with workflow efficiency and radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different radiographic view combinations on fetlock pathology detection and observer agreement in a PPE context; hypothesising that detection rates vary with view selection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two observers reviewed fetlock radiographic series using four view combinations: lateromedial (LM) alone, LM and dorsopalmar/plantar (LM/DP), LM and oblique projections (LM/OB), and the full series (FULL). McNemar's chi-squared test assessed detection differences; Cohen's kappa evaluated intra- and inter-observer agreement, and diagnostic parameters were calculated for reduced views relative to the full series.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 673 fetlock series were reviewed. The LM/OB combination showed no significant difference in detecting most pathologies compared to the full series. Observer agreement was generally highest with the full series. Intra-observer agreement was highest for LM/OB, except for subchondral bone changes in the proximal phalanx, where LM/DP performed better; though overall agreement was low. Lateromedial projections reliably detected fragmentation, sesamoid fractures, and osseous cyst-like lesions. Oblique views were superior for sesamoid bone changes.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, selection bias, and lack of gold standard confirmation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While LM/OB offers a practical compromise in many PPE scenarios, certain pathologies, particularly subchondral bone changes, may require additional views. A tailored approach based on age, discipline, and clinical risk may optimise diagnostic yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiographic protocols for the metacarpo-/tarsophalangeal joint during pre-purchase examinations (PPE) vary internationally, but their impact on pathology detection remains unclear. Optimising imaging protocols is essential to balance diagnostic accuracy with workflow efficiency and radiation exposure.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of different radiographic view combinations on fetlock pathology detection and observer agreement in a PPE context; hypothesising that detection rates vary with view selection.

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: Two observers reviewed fetlock radiographic series using four view combinations: lateromedial (LM) alone, LM and dorsopalmar/plantar (LM/DP), LM and oblique projections (LM/OB), and the full series (FULL). McNemar's chi-squared test assessed detection differences; Cohen's kappa evaluated intra- and inter-observer agreement, and diagnostic parameters were calculated for reduced views relative to the full series.

Results: A total of 673 fetlock series were reviewed. The LM/OB combination showed no significant difference in detecting most pathologies compared to the full series. Observer agreement was generally highest with the full series. Intra-observer agreement was highest for LM/OB, except for subchondral bone changes in the proximal phalanx, where LM/DP performed better; though overall agreement was low. Lateromedial projections reliably detected fragmentation, sesamoid fractures, and osseous cyst-like lesions. Oblique views were superior for sesamoid bone changes.

Main limitations: Retrospective design, selection bias, and lack of gold standard confirmation.

Conclusions: While LM/OB offers a practical compromise in many PPE scenarios, certain pathologies, particularly subchondral bone changes, may require additional views. A tailored approach based on age, discipline, and clinical risk may optimise diagnostic yield.

侧内侧和斜位x线片与马的全系列x线片一样能有效地检测出大多数的fetlock病变。
背景:购买前检查(PPE)时掌/跗指关节的x线摄影方案在国际上有所不同,但它们对病理检测的影响尚不清楚。优化成像方案对于平衡诊断准确性、工作流程效率和辐射暴露至关重要。目的:评价不同x线影像组合在PPE环境下对fetlock病理检测和观察者一致性的影响;假设检出率随视图选择而变化。研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。方法:两名观察者回顾了采用四种视图组合的fetlock x线摄影系列:单独的侧内侧(LM), LM和背跖/足底(LM/DP), LM和斜投影(LM/OB)以及全系列(full)。McNemar的卡方检验评估检测差异;Cohen的kappa评估了观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性,并计算了相对于完整系列的减少视图的诊断参数。结果:共回顾了673个fetlock系列。与完整系列相比,LM/OB组合在检测大多数病理方面没有显着差异。观察员对整个系列的赞同程度一般最高。除了近端指骨的软骨下骨改变外,LM/OB的观察者内一致性最高,其中LM/DP表现更好;尽管总体的同意度很低。外侧内侧投影可靠地检测到碎裂、籽骨骨折和骨囊肿样病变。斜位片对籽骨改变效果更好。主要局限性:回顾性设计、选择偏差和缺乏金标准确认。结论:虽然LM/OB在许多PPE情况下提供了实际的折衷方案,但某些病理,特别是软骨下骨改变,可能需要额外的检查。基于年龄、学科和临床风险的量身定制的方法可以优化诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信