Contralateral Randomized Comparison Between Intracameral Extended-Release Dexamethasone 9% Suspension Placed in the Capsular Bag with the Established Post-Cataract Regimen

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Vasilios F. Diakonis, George D. Kymionis, Konstantinos T. Tsaousis, Renee C. Bondurant, Caroline C. Watson, Konstantina G. Koulotsiou, Robert J. Weinstock
{"title":"Contralateral Randomized Comparison Between Intracameral Extended-Release Dexamethasone 9% Suspension Placed in the Capsular Bag with the Established Post-Cataract Regimen","authors":"Vasilios F. Diakonis,&nbsp;George D. Kymionis,&nbsp;Konstantinos T. Tsaousis,&nbsp;Renee C. Bondurant,&nbsp;Caroline C. Watson,&nbsp;Konstantina G. Koulotsiou,&nbsp;Robert J. Weinstock","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03306-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intracameral dexamethasone 9% single-dose sustained-release suspension with the established pharmaceutical regimen after cataract surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective self-controlled study included consecutive patients with bilateral visually significant cataracts. Patients received bilateral cataract extraction in the Eye Institute of West Florida by the same experienced surgeon (RJW). One randomly selected eye of every patient received a sustained-release dexamethasone 9% suspension placed in the capsular bag at the optic–haptic junction of the intraocular lens (study group); post-cataract topical regimen included topical antibiotic and NSAID. The other eye (control group) received only topical pharmaceutical agents after cataract extraction, which included the same antibiotic and NSAID as the fellow eye along with a steroid. All patients were followed at day 1, 7, and 30 after cataract surgery and visual acuity, manifest refraction, subjective anterior chamber inflammation grading, subjective patient pain score (questionnaire) along with specular microscopy of the cornea and optical coherence tomography of the macula were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-eight eyes of 24 patients (16 female and 8 male), aged 69.54 ± 7.36 (range 54–85 years), were included in the study. All patients completed the follow-up, while none of the study eyes required additional topical treatment for inflammation control. Anterior chamber inflammation, assessed using the Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), demonstrated a mild inflammatory response postoperatively, which resolved over time in both groups. On postoperative day 1, SOIS was slightly higher in the study eyes (1.12 ± 0.23) compared to the control eyes (0.92 ± 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.054). By day 7, inflammation had significantly decreased (study: 0.16 ± 0.23; control: 0.17 ± 0.20, <i>p</i> = 0.88), with no residual inflammation at the final follow-up.</p><p>Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber inflammation, corneal endothelial cell density, and central retinal thickness demonstrated no significant difference between the study and control group throughout the follow-up (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). None of the patients reported pain after either procedure, while no intra- or postoperative complications were noted in any of the eyes.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of intracameral dexamethasone 9% sustained-release suspension placed in the capsular bag at the time of cataract surgery seems to offer similar safety and efficacy as the established post-cataract topical regimen. Furthermore, no signs of iris atrophy were evident in any of the eyes up to 1 month post cataract surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 10","pages":"5124 - 5133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03306-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intracameral dexamethasone 9% single-dose sustained-release suspension with the established pharmaceutical regimen after cataract surgery.

Methods

This prospective self-controlled study included consecutive patients with bilateral visually significant cataracts. Patients received bilateral cataract extraction in the Eye Institute of West Florida by the same experienced surgeon (RJW). One randomly selected eye of every patient received a sustained-release dexamethasone 9% suspension placed in the capsular bag at the optic–haptic junction of the intraocular lens (study group); post-cataract topical regimen included topical antibiotic and NSAID. The other eye (control group) received only topical pharmaceutical agents after cataract extraction, which included the same antibiotic and NSAID as the fellow eye along with a steroid. All patients were followed at day 1, 7, and 30 after cataract surgery and visual acuity, manifest refraction, subjective anterior chamber inflammation grading, subjective patient pain score (questionnaire) along with specular microscopy of the cornea and optical coherence tomography of the macula were evaluated.

Results

Forty-eight eyes of 24 patients (16 female and 8 male), aged 69.54 ± 7.36 (range 54–85 years), were included in the study. All patients completed the follow-up, while none of the study eyes required additional topical treatment for inflammation control. Anterior chamber inflammation, assessed using the Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), demonstrated a mild inflammatory response postoperatively, which resolved over time in both groups. On postoperative day 1, SOIS was slightly higher in the study eyes (1.12 ± 0.23) compared to the control eyes (0.92 ± 0.34, p = 0.054). By day 7, inflammation had significantly decreased (study: 0.16 ± 0.23; control: 0.17 ± 0.20, p = 0.88), with no residual inflammation at the final follow-up.

Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber inflammation, corneal endothelial cell density, and central retinal thickness demonstrated no significant difference between the study and control group throughout the follow-up (p > 0.05). None of the patients reported pain after either procedure, while no intra- or postoperative complications were noted in any of the eyes.

Conclusions

The use of intracameral dexamethasone 9% sustained-release suspension placed in the capsular bag at the time of cataract surgery seems to offer similar safety and efficacy as the established post-cataract topical regimen. Furthermore, no signs of iris atrophy were evident in any of the eyes up to 1 month post cataract surgery.

囊袋内9%地塞米松缓释剂与白内障后治疗方案的对侧随机比较。
前言:本研究旨在比较白内障术后地塞米松9%单剂量缓释混悬液与既定药物治疗方案的安全性和有效性。方法:本前瞻性自我对照研究纳入连续双侧显著性白内障患者。患者在西佛罗里达眼科研究所由同一位经验丰富的外科医生(RJW)进行双侧白内障摘除。每例患者随机选择一只眼,给予9%地塞米松缓释悬液,置于人工晶状体视触觉交界处的囊袋内(研究组);白内障术后局部治疗方案包括局部抗生素和非甾体抗炎药。另一只眼睛(对照组)在白内障摘除后只接受局部药物治疗,包括与另一只眼睛相同的抗生素和非甾体抗炎药以及类固醇。所有患者在白内障手术后第1天、第7天和第30天进行随访,评估视力、明显屈光、主观前房炎症分级、主观患者疼痛评分(问卷)以及角膜镜面显微镜和黄斑光学相干断层扫描。结果:纳入患者24例48眼(女16例,男8例),年龄69.54±7.36岁,年龄54 ~ 85岁。所有患者都完成了随访,没有一只研究眼睛需要额外的局部治疗来控制炎症。前房炎症,用眼部炎症积分(SOIS)评估,术后表现出轻微的炎症反应,随着时间的推移,两组均消退。术后第1天,研究眼的SOIS(1.12±0.23)略高于对照眼(0.92±0.34,p = 0.054)。到第7天,炎症明显减轻(研究:0.16±0.23;对照组:0.17±0.20,p = 0.88),末次随访无炎症残留。在整个随访过程中,未矫正和矫正的距离视力、眼压、前房炎症、角膜内皮细胞密度、视网膜中央厚度在实验组和对照组之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。两种手术后均无患者报告疼痛,同时在任何眼睛中均未发现任何内或术后并发症。结论:白内障手术时囊袋内放置9%地塞米松缓释悬液的安全性和有效性与现有的白内障术后局部用药方案相似。此外,在白内障手术后1个月,没有任何眼睛虹膜萎缩的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信