Arthrodesis of Distal Interphalangeal Joints Using X-Fuse Implant A Five-Year Retrospective Study of 64 Fingers.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
A Renault, J Maximen, M Ebalard, G Mevel, M Ropars, T Dreano
{"title":"Arthrodesis of Distal Interphalangeal Joints Using X-Fuse Implant A Five-Year Retrospective Study of 64 Fingers.","authors":"A Renault, J Maximen, M Ebalard, G Mevel, M Ropars, T Dreano","doi":"10.52628/91.1.13284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arthrodesis is the gold standard for treating distal interphalangeal arthropathy of the long fingers (IPD) and interphalangeal arthropathy of the thumb (IP). While many surgical techniques have been documented to have high consolidation rates (80-100%), none appeared to be superior to the others. In 2008, the intramedullary X-Fuse implant (Stryker, Switzerland) demonstrated favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a limited study with short-term follow-up. Building upon these findings, this study aimed to evaluate the objective and subjective findings of arthrodesis of IPD and IP using the X-Fuse® implant over a medium-term period.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 53 patients (49 women and 4 men) who underwent arthrodesis of the IPD or IP joint surgery between May 2012 and January 2021. All surgeries were performed by senior hand surgeons at the same hospital, employing identical surgical techniques. Afterward, patients were immobilized for 6 weeks postoperatively. For analyses, data were extracted from patients' medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 arthrodeses were assessed (with 6 patients lost to follow-up). The average follow-up period was 59.8 (±28) months. The mean QuickDASH score at the last review was 17.1 (±17), and the mean visual analog scale score was 0.64 (±1.6). Notably, more than 90% of patients reported good or excellent satisfaction with the surgery, and radiographic fusion was achieved in over 90% of cases, with an average fusion period of 12.9 weeks (±1.3). However, six cases of pseudarthrosis were documented, with only one requiring revision surgery due to symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>X-Fuse® implant arthrodesis yields satisfactory clinical and radiographical outcomes, providing good long-term stability and low complication rates. This technique is considered reliable and reproducible for patients with primary osteoarthritis, inflammatory conditions, and post-traumatic arthropathies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"91 1","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.1.13284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Arthrodesis is the gold standard for treating distal interphalangeal arthropathy of the long fingers (IPD) and interphalangeal arthropathy of the thumb (IP). While many surgical techniques have been documented to have high consolidation rates (80-100%), none appeared to be superior to the others. In 2008, the intramedullary X-Fuse implant (Stryker, Switzerland) demonstrated favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a limited study with short-term follow-up. Building upon these findings, this study aimed to evaluate the objective and subjective findings of arthrodesis of IPD and IP using the X-Fuse® implant over a medium-term period.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively included 53 patients (49 women and 4 men) who underwent arthrodesis of the IPD or IP joint surgery between May 2012 and January 2021. All surgeries were performed by senior hand surgeons at the same hospital, employing identical surgical techniques. Afterward, patients were immobilized for 6 weeks postoperatively. For analyses, data were extracted from patients' medical records.

Results: A total of 64 arthrodeses were assessed (with 6 patients lost to follow-up). The average follow-up period was 59.8 (±28) months. The mean QuickDASH score at the last review was 17.1 (±17), and the mean visual analog scale score was 0.64 (±1.6). Notably, more than 90% of patients reported good or excellent satisfaction with the surgery, and radiographic fusion was achieved in over 90% of cases, with an average fusion period of 12.9 weeks (±1.3). However, six cases of pseudarthrosis were documented, with only one requiring revision surgery due to symptoms.

Discussion: X-Fuse® implant arthrodesis yields satisfactory clinical and radiographical outcomes, providing good long-term stability and low complication rates. This technique is considered reliable and reproducible for patients with primary osteoarthritis, inflammatory conditions, and post-traumatic arthropathies.

X-Fuse假体对64指远端指间关节的5年回顾性研究。
关节融合术是治疗长指远端指间关节病(IPD)和拇指指间关节病(IP)的金标准。虽然许多外科技术都有很高的巩固率(80-100%),但没有一种技术比其他技术更优越。2008年,髓内X-Fuse植入物(Stryker,瑞士)在一项有限的短期随访研究中显示出良好的临床和影像学结果。基于这些发现,本研究旨在评估中期使用X-Fuse®假体进行IPD和IP关节融合术的客观和主观结果。患者和方法:我们回顾性纳入了53例患者(49名女性和4名男性),这些患者在2012年5月至2021年1月期间接受了IPD或IP关节融合术。所有手术均由同一家医院的资深手外科医生进行,采用相同的手术技术。术后患者固定6周。为了进行分析,数据是从患者的医疗记录中提取的。结果:共评估64个关节(其中6例失访)。平均随访时间59.8(±28)个月。末次回顾时QuickDASH评分平均为17.1(±17)分,视觉模拟量表评分平均为0.64(±1.6)分。值得注意的是,超过90%的患者报告手术满意或非常满意,超过90%的病例实现了放射融合,平均融合时间为12.9周(±1.3)。然而,记录了6例假关节,其中只有1例因症状需要翻修手术。讨论:X-Fuse®假体关节融合术具有令人满意的临床和影像学结果,具有良好的长期稳定性和低并发症发生率。对于原发性骨关节炎、炎症和创伤后关节病患者,该技术被认为是可靠和可重复的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信