Health System Responsiveness of Rural Health Units in the Cagayan Valley Region: A Cross-sectional Study.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.9808
Jonalyn P Santos, Janina C Abad, Alvin A Aldea, Suzette D Itay, Vic Valiant O Laureta, Rosemarie A Tadena, Rosalie A Turingan, Karen Joy A Catacutan, Darin Jan C Tindowen
{"title":"Health System Responsiveness of Rural Health Units in the Cagayan Valley Region: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Jonalyn P Santos, Janina C Abad, Alvin A Aldea, Suzette D Itay, Vic Valiant O Laureta, Rosemarie A Tadena, Rosalie A Turingan, Karen Joy A Catacutan, Darin Jan C Tindowen","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.9808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the level of health system responsiveness of Rural Health Units (RHUs) in Cagayan Valley Region along seven domains of responsiveness namely dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, choice of provider, prompt attention, communication, and quality of basic amenities, and five core components of the health system namely health governance, health human resource, health information system, access to medicines and technology, and service delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional research design was adopted using survey as the primary means of data collection using a researcher-developed questionnaire. The study was conducted in RHUs of 15 identified municipalities in the region. The municipalities were chosen based on their low performance in the LGU health score cards for 2019. A total of 618 clients and 235 health workers were included in the study. Frequency, percentage, and mean were used to analyze the profile and level of health system responsiveness. T-test and one-way ANOVA were used to test significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the RHUs included in the study have very good level of health system responsiveness, with overall percentage scores ranging from 73.55 to 88.08, in all domains assessed. However, choice of providers within the facilities (62.71%) and access to medicine and technology (77.45%) were the least responsive among all the identified domains. Significant differences in the clients' assessment of the responsiveness of the RHUs were seen when grouped according to their sex, age, educational attainment, income level, overall level of health, frequency of visits, and distance of home to facility. The RHUs' location, whether in an urban or rural area, number of staff, and number of barangays catered also were found to determine the level of health system responsiveness. Moreover, not all RHUs were able to comply with basic requirements of the Department of Health specifically along the services offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It can be concluded therefore that the RHUs, despite the limitations in certain aspects are still able to meet the expectations of the clients and health workers in the delivery of health services. However, in order to maximize responsiveness of these facilities, DOH requirements for these facilities should be met.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 9","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.9808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the level of health system responsiveness of Rural Health Units (RHUs) in Cagayan Valley Region along seven domains of responsiveness namely dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, choice of provider, prompt attention, communication, and quality of basic amenities, and five core components of the health system namely health governance, health human resource, health information system, access to medicines and technology, and service delivery.

Methods: A cross-sectional research design was adopted using survey as the primary means of data collection using a researcher-developed questionnaire. The study was conducted in RHUs of 15 identified municipalities in the region. The municipalities were chosen based on their low performance in the LGU health score cards for 2019. A total of 618 clients and 235 health workers were included in the study. Frequency, percentage, and mean were used to analyze the profile and level of health system responsiveness. T-test and one-way ANOVA were used to test significant differences.

Results: The results showed that the RHUs included in the study have very good level of health system responsiveness, with overall percentage scores ranging from 73.55 to 88.08, in all domains assessed. However, choice of providers within the facilities (62.71%) and access to medicine and technology (77.45%) were the least responsive among all the identified domains. Significant differences in the clients' assessment of the responsiveness of the RHUs were seen when grouped according to their sex, age, educational attainment, income level, overall level of health, frequency of visits, and distance of home to facility. The RHUs' location, whether in an urban or rural area, number of staff, and number of barangays catered also were found to determine the level of health system responsiveness. Moreover, not all RHUs were able to comply with basic requirements of the Department of Health specifically along the services offered.

Conclusion: It can be concluded therefore that the RHUs, despite the limitations in certain aspects are still able to meet the expectations of the clients and health workers in the delivery of health services. However, in order to maximize responsiveness of these facilities, DOH requirements for these facilities should be met.

卡加延山谷地区农村卫生单位的卫生系统响应:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究评估了卡加延河谷地区农村卫生单位(rus)的卫生系统响应水平,包括七个响应领域,即尊严、自主性、保密性、提供者选择、及时关注、沟通和基本设施质量,以及卫生系统的五个核心组成部分,即卫生治理、卫生人力资源、卫生信息系统、获得药品和技术以及服务提供。方法:采用横断面研究设计,采用调查作为主要的数据收集手段,使用研究者开发的问卷。这项研究是在该地区15个已确定的城市的乡村卫生单位进行的。这些城市是根据它们在2019年LGU健康记分卡中的低表现选出的。共有618名客户和235名卫生工作者参与了这项研究。使用频率、百分比和平均值来分析卫生系统响应的概况和水平。采用t检验和单因素方差分析检验显著性差异。结果:结果表明,纳入研究的rhu具有非常好的卫生系统响应水平,在所有评估领域的总体百分比得分从73.55到88.08不等。然而,机构内提供者的选择(62.71%)和药物和技术的获取(77.45%)在所有确定的领域中反应最少。当根据客户的性别、年龄、受教育程度、收入水平、整体健康水平、就诊频率和家到设施的距离进行分组时,客户对rhu反应性的评估存在显著差异。还发现,卫生保健单位的位置(无论是在城市还是农村地区)、工作人员数量和提供服务的村数决定了卫生系统的反应水平。此外,并非所有初级保健单位都能够遵守卫生部的基本要求,特别是所提供的服务。结论:因此可以得出结论,尽管在某些方面存在局限性,初级保健单位在提供保健服务方面仍然能够满足客户和保健工作者的期望。然而,为了最大限度地提高这些设施的响应能力,应该满足这些设施的DOH要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信