Acceptability of proposed stewardship interventions to reduce preoperative screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kimberly C Dukes, Kalpana Gupta, Julia Friberg Walhof, Madisen E Brown, Judith Strymish, Dan Suh, William J O'Brien, Jeffrey Chan, Brice Beck, Vanessa Au, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Marin L Schweizer
{"title":"Acceptability of proposed stewardship interventions to reduce preoperative screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.","authors":"Kimberly C Dukes, Kalpana Gupta, Julia Friberg Walhof, Madisen E Brown, Judith Strymish, Dan Suh, William J O'Brien, Jeffrey Chan, Brice Beck, Vanessa Au, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Marin L Schweizer","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice guidelines do not recommend screening patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) before nonurological surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews at 5 Veterans Affairs hospitals about the acceptability of 4 prospectively identified potential interventions to deimplement routine preoperative urine testing for ASB: substitution of another infection prevention intervention, laboratory restrictions on ordering urine tests, audit and feedback on guideline concordance, and interactive workshops. We coded responses as acceptable, not acceptable, or possibly acceptable and noted recommendations for modifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 35 clinicians. Clinicians expressed concerns about deimplementing routine urine testing for specific procedures and specialties. Some actively sought to identify and treat ASB. Interviewees found audit and feedback and substitution of different infection control practices most acceptable. Interviewees suggested changes to make interventions more acceptable or feasible and identified new potential interventions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding clinical decision-making about preoperative urine screening and treatment can help design effective interventions to facilitate guideline concordance and support antibiotic stewardship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions to optimize preoperative urine screening and treatment may require tailoring for surgical specialties and should address clinical concerns about intervention feasibility. Developing a suite of interventions could allow sites to choose intervention(s) that would work for them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice guidelines do not recommend screening patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) before nonurological surgeries.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews at 5 Veterans Affairs hospitals about the acceptability of 4 prospectively identified potential interventions to deimplement routine preoperative urine testing for ASB: substitution of another infection prevention intervention, laboratory restrictions on ordering urine tests, audit and feedback on guideline concordance, and interactive workshops. We coded responses as acceptable, not acceptable, or possibly acceptable and noted recommendations for modifications.

Results: We interviewed 35 clinicians. Clinicians expressed concerns about deimplementing routine urine testing for specific procedures and specialties. Some actively sought to identify and treat ASB. Interviewees found audit and feedback and substitution of different infection control practices most acceptable. Interviewees suggested changes to make interventions more acceptable or feasible and identified new potential interventions.

Discussion: Understanding clinical decision-making about preoperative urine screening and treatment can help design effective interventions to facilitate guideline concordance and support antibiotic stewardship.

Conclusions: Interventions to optimize preoperative urine screening and treatment may require tailoring for surgical specialties and should address clinical concerns about intervention feasibility. Developing a suite of interventions could allow sites to choose intervention(s) that would work for them.

建议管理干预减少术前筛查和治疗无症状细菌尿的可接受性。
背景:IDSA临床实践指南不建议在非泌尿外科手术前筛查无症状细菌尿(ASB)患者。方法:我们在5家退伍军人事务医院进行了半结构化访谈,以了解4种前瞻性确定的潜在干预措施的可接受性,以取消ASB常规术前尿液检测:替代另一种感染预防干预措施,实验室对尿检的限制,指南一致性的审核和反馈,以及互动研讨会。我们将响应编码为可接受的、不可接受的或可能接受的,并记录了修改建议。结果:我们采访了35名临床医生。临床医生对取消特定程序和专业的常规尿液检测表示担忧。一些人积极寻求识别和治疗ASB。受访者认为审计和反馈以及替代不同的感染控制做法是最可接受的。受访者建议做出改变,使干预措施更容易被接受或可行,并确定了新的潜在干预措施。讨论:了解术前尿液筛查和治疗的临床决策可以帮助设计有效的干预措施,以促进指南的一致性和支持抗生素管理。结论:优化术前尿液筛查和治疗的干预措施可能需要根据外科专业进行调整,并应考虑干预措施的可行性。开发一套干预措施可以让网站选择对他们有用的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信