The Basophil Activation Test Is the Most Accurate Test in Predicting Allergic Reactions to Baked and Fresh Cow's Milk During Oral Food Challenges

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Allergy Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1111/all.16675
Irene Bartha, Holly Boyd, Ru-Xin Foong, Marta Krawiec, Andreina Marques-Mejias, Hannah F. Marshall, Suzana Radulovic, Faye Harrison, Grammatiki Antoneria, Zainab Jama, Matthew Kwok, Ewa Pietraszewicz, Malak Eghleilib, Cristian Ricci, Tom Marrs, Gideon Lack, George Du Toit, Alexandra F. Santos
{"title":"The Basophil Activation Test Is the Most Accurate Test in Predicting Allergic Reactions to Baked and Fresh Cow's Milk During Oral Food Challenges","authors":"Irene Bartha,&nbsp;Holly Boyd,&nbsp;Ru-Xin Foong,&nbsp;Marta Krawiec,&nbsp;Andreina Marques-Mejias,&nbsp;Hannah F. Marshall,&nbsp;Suzana Radulovic,&nbsp;Faye Harrison,&nbsp;Grammatiki Antoneria,&nbsp;Zainab Jama,&nbsp;Matthew Kwok,&nbsp;Ewa Pietraszewicz,&nbsp;Malak Eghleilib,&nbsp;Cristian Ricci,&nbsp;Tom Marrs,&nbsp;Gideon Lack,&nbsp;George Du Toit,&nbsp;Alexandra F. Santos","doi":"10.1111/all.16675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cow's milk is the most common cause of food allergy and related fatalities. Consumption of baked milk (BM) has been associated with better prognosis, nutrition and quality-of-life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The BAT 2 milk study (NCT03309488) was a diagnostic study of cow's milk allergy designed according to STARD guidelines. All children had an oral food challenge (OFC) to BM, and those who tolerated BM were offered an OFC to fresh milk (FM). The diagnostic performance of the basophil activation test (BAT), skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) was assessed in comparison with OFC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of the 150 children studied, 85% tolerated BM and 56% also tolerated FM. BAT had the best diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.90 for BM and 0.81 for FM) compared with the other tests for both BM (sIgE: 0.79 and SPT: 0.70) and FM (sIgE: 0.74 and SPT: 0.78) allergies. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs to select patients for OFC would have led to the following proportion of children having OFC (and positive OFC) to BM: 99% (13%) for SPT to baked milk, 82% (17%) for sIgE to boiled milk, and 49% (24%) for BAT to baked milk. In children younger than 2 years, only 27% required an OFC following BAT to BM (compared to 100% and 81% following SPT or sIgE to milk extract, respectively), with 100% diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BAT was the best test to identify children who reacted on OFC to BM or FM. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs, BAT ensured the lowest need for OFC and 100% diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03309488</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":"80 10","pages":"2861-2873"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/all.16675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.16675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cow's milk is the most common cause of food allergy and related fatalities. Consumption of baked milk (BM) has been associated with better prognosis, nutrition and quality-of-life.

Methods

The BAT 2 milk study (NCT03309488) was a diagnostic study of cow's milk allergy designed according to STARD guidelines. All children had an oral food challenge (OFC) to BM, and those who tolerated BM were offered an OFC to fresh milk (FM). The diagnostic performance of the basophil activation test (BAT), skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) was assessed in comparison with OFC.

Results

Out of the 150 children studied, 85% tolerated BM and 56% also tolerated FM. BAT had the best diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.90 for BM and 0.81 for FM) compared with the other tests for both BM (sIgE: 0.79 and SPT: 0.70) and FM (sIgE: 0.74 and SPT: 0.78) allergies. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs to select patients for OFC would have led to the following proportion of children having OFC (and positive OFC) to BM: 99% (13%) for SPT to baked milk, 82% (17%) for sIgE to boiled milk, and 49% (24%) for BAT to baked milk. In children younger than 2 years, only 27% required an OFC following BAT to BM (compared to 100% and 81% following SPT or sIgE to milk extract, respectively), with 100% diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions

BAT was the best test to identify children who reacted on OFC to BM or FM. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs, BAT ensured the lowest need for OFC and 100% diagnostic accuracy.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03309488

Abstract Image

嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验是预测在口服食物挑战中对烤牛奶和新鲜牛奶过敏反应最准确的试验。
背景:牛奶是食物过敏和相关死亡的最常见原因。食用烘焙牛奶(BM)与更好的预后、营养和生活质量有关。方法:BAT 2牛奶研究(NCT03309488)是一项根据STARD指南设计的牛奶过敏诊断研究。所有儿童均对BM进行口服食物挑战(OFC),对BM耐受的儿童给予新鲜牛奶OFC (FM)。与OFC比较,评价嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)、皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和特异性IgE (sIgE)的诊断价值。结果:在研究的150名儿童中,85%耐受BM, 56%耐受FM。与其他试验相比,BAT对BM (sIgE: 0.79, SPT: 0.70)和FM (sIgE: 0.74, SPT: 0.78)过敏的诊断准确率最高(BM和FM的接受者操作者特征曲线下面积分别为0.90和0.81)。使用100%的敏感性和100%的特异性临界值来选择OFC患者,将导致以下比例的儿童有OFC(和阳性OFC)到BM: SPT到烤牛奶的比例为99% (13%),sIgE到煮牛奶的比例为82% (17%),BAT到烤牛奶的比例为49%(24%)。在2岁以下的儿童中,只有27%的儿童在BAT到BM后需要OFC(相比之下,SPT或sIgE到牛奶提取物分别为100%和81%),诊断准确率为100%。结论:BAT是鉴别OFC对BM或FM有反应的儿童的最佳试验。使用100%的灵敏度和100%的特异性临界值,BAT确保了对OFC的最低需求和100%的诊断准确性。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT03309488。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信