Late Stages of Tropical Silvopastoral System: An Opportunity to Maximise Forage and Animal Production

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Henrique Bauab Brunetti, Rolando Pasquini Neto, Cristiam Bosi, Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira, Alexandre Rossetto Garcia, Lívia Ferreira Pinho, Alda Juliana Castro de Sousa, Giovanna Galhardo Ramos, Alberto Carlos de Campos Bernardi, André Faria de Pedroso, José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane
{"title":"Late Stages of Tropical Silvopastoral System: An Opportunity to Maximise Forage and Animal Production","authors":"Henrique Bauab Brunetti,&nbsp;Rolando Pasquini Neto,&nbsp;Cristiam Bosi,&nbsp;Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira,&nbsp;Alexandre Rossetto Garcia,&nbsp;Lívia Ferreira Pinho,&nbsp;Alda Juliana Castro de Sousa,&nbsp;Giovanna Galhardo Ramos,&nbsp;Alberto Carlos de Campos Bernardi,&nbsp;André Faria de Pedroso,&nbsp;José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane","doi":"10.1111/gfs.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Silvopastoral systems (SPS) integrate pasture, trees, and animals in the same area and are alternatives for sustainable pasture intensification. We aimed to test whether, in the late stages of an SPS, with large but sparsely distributed trees (83 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>), forage and animal productivity are comparable to a full sun pasture (FS) over an extended period. The study was conducted at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos/SP, Brazil, from 2020 to 2023. The SPS consisted of Piatã palisade grass ([<i>Urochloa brizantha</i>] [Hochst ex A. Rich.] Stapf cv. BRS Piatã) pastures shaded by eucalyptus (<i>Eucalyptus urograndis</i> clone GG100) rows. The trees were planted in 2011, spaced 15 × 2 m (333 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>) in a nearly east–west orientation, thinned in 2016 to 15 × 4 m (166 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>) and further thinned in 2019 to 30 × 4 m (83 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>). The FS was a Piatã palisade grass monoculture. Each system comprised four 3-ha areas divided into six 0.5-ha paddocks rotationally stocked with <i>Nellore</i> and <i>Canchim</i> (3/8 Zebu × 5/8 Charolais) yearling beef bulls (<i>n</i> = 32 [four/year. experimental unit]). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), forage accumulation and nutritive value, animal performance and productivity, and wood production were assessed. Post-thinning tree configuration resulted in only a 7% PAR decrease to the understory, supporting a live forage accumulation of 21,871 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, compared to 25,373 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> in the FS, and an animal productivity of 460 kg live weight ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>—322% greater than the Brazilian average—for the three-year period. Additionally, the large trees produced 15.8 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> of wood. Late stages of SPSs enable high forage and animal productivity over extended periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems (SPS) integrate pasture, trees, and animals in the same area and are alternatives for sustainable pasture intensification. We aimed to test whether, in the late stages of an SPS, with large but sparsely distributed trees (83 trees ha−1), forage and animal productivity are comparable to a full sun pasture (FS) over an extended period. The study was conducted at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos/SP, Brazil, from 2020 to 2023. The SPS consisted of Piatã palisade grass ([Urochloa brizantha] [Hochst ex A. Rich.] Stapf cv. BRS Piatã) pastures shaded by eucalyptus (Eucalyptus urograndis clone GG100) rows. The trees were planted in 2011, spaced 15 × 2 m (333 trees ha−1) in a nearly east–west orientation, thinned in 2016 to 15 × 4 m (166 trees ha−1) and further thinned in 2019 to 30 × 4 m (83 trees ha−1). The FS was a Piatã palisade grass monoculture. Each system comprised four 3-ha areas divided into six 0.5-ha paddocks rotationally stocked with Nellore and Canchim (3/8 Zebu × 5/8 Charolais) yearling beef bulls (n = 32 [four/year. experimental unit]). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), forage accumulation and nutritive value, animal performance and productivity, and wood production were assessed. Post-thinning tree configuration resulted in only a 7% PAR decrease to the understory, supporting a live forage accumulation of 21,871 kg DM ha−1 year−1, compared to 25,373 kg DM ha−1 year−1 in the FS, and an animal productivity of 460 kg live weight ha−1 year−1—322% greater than the Brazilian average—for the three-year period. Additionally, the large trees produced 15.8 m3 ha−1 of wood. Late stages of SPSs enable high forage and animal productivity over extended periods.

Abstract Image

热带森林系统的后期:最大限度地提高饲料和动物产量的机会
森林放牧系统(SPS)将同一地区的牧场、树木和动物整合在一起,是可持续牧场集约化的替代方案。我们的目的是测试,在SPS的后期阶段,在较长一段时间内,具有大型但稀疏分布的树木(83棵树/公顷)的牧草和动物生产力是否与全日光牧场(FS)相当。该研究于2020年至2023年在巴西 o Carlos/SP的Embrapa东南畜牧公司进行。SPS包括Piatã栅栏草([Urochloa brizantha] [Hochst ex A. Rich]。[au:]斯塔夫BRS Piatã)牧场被桉树(eucalyptus urograndis克隆GG100)行遮蔽。这些树木于2011年种植,间距为15 × 2米(333棵树- 1),接近东西朝向,2016年减少到15 × 4米(166棵树- 1),2019年进一步减少到30 × 4米(83棵树- 1)。FS是Piatã栅栏草单一栽培。每个系统包括4个3公顷的区域,分为6个0.5公顷的围场,轮流放养Nellore和Canchim (3/8 Zebu × 5/8 Charolais)年龄肉牛(n = 32[4] /年)。实验单位])。评估了光合有效辐射(PAR)、饲料积累和营养价值、动物生产性能和生产力以及木材产量。间伐后的树木配置导致林下植被PAR仅下降7%,支持的活饲料积累量为21,871 kg DM每公顷−1年−1,而FS为25,373 kg DM每公顷−1年−1,动物生产力为460 kg活重每公顷−1年−1,比巴西平均水平高322%。此外,大树产生了15.8立方米的木材。牧草生长的后期可以在较长时期内保持较高的饲料和动物生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信